Preview

Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
496 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rousseau
After many years of absolute monarchy different philosophers, leaders, and writers idealized new forms of government to create the age of Enlightenment. Important Pre-Enlightenment people such as Queen Elizabeth,Thomas Hobbes, King Louis XIV, and Plato believed that the most successful way to run a country was with a single ruler. The philosophers and the leaders of the Enlightenment era believed that providing citizens with independence and freedom was the best way for a country to thrive and succeed. In years past, the majority of governmental ideas were based on a ruler with absolute power, such as the king or queen of a country. The common belief of the ruling class during the pre enlightenment period was that humans were born dirty, unhealthy, and were generally unable to govern themselves. With a “caring” and “fair” ruler they could be saved from the burden of their own judgement. In contrast, Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, Baron De Montesquieu, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau thought that people were born pure and only were bad from the “corruption of society”, thus they should have a say in …show more content…
Locke and Rousseau both believed in a form of direct democracy, including freedom, equality, and independence. One of Locke’s important philosophies was that people are born with a blank slate, the “Tabula Rasa”, so everyone deserves political respect from birth, but with bad actions such privileges can go away. Rousseau pushed for a social contract to govern society, which took away rights but promised safety. Also, they both valued the human mind much more than past rulers, hence why they set up many ways for citizens to express their own ideas in their government. By including their philosophies in the Enlightenment age it helped push more countries in Europe to become a direct

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The lack of an impartial judge is a defining characteristic of the state of nature, and this lack of a common judge can lead to confusion and violence therefore leading to the state of war. The state of nature and the state of war are not two separate concepts but the state of nature has the fundamental problem and civil government is the solution for the problems of the state of nature.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of these people, Voltaire, preferred democracy as their Method of rule. In document 4 Voltaire expressed his thoughts on leadership “the best government seems to be that in which all ranks of men are equally protected by the laws….” This philosopher is trying to convey his beliefs on democracy and this will get citizens to question the churches methods in the future. The same can be said about document 5, another philosopher john Locke, wrote about his ideas. Both john and Voltaire share the same ideas on government: this is a quote from johns Two Treatises on Government “Men being by nature all free, equal, and independent no one can be subjected to the political power of another without his consent” in this quote he wants the system of government to be centered around the people,…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau developed a definition for the state of nature by using his knowledge of humans and animals, which he gathered from observations and experiences. He did not base his ideas of the state of nature on religious beliefs. Rather, he worked backwards; he used what he knew about contemporary man to guess how man was in the beginning (i.e. in the state of nature). Locke begins to explore the state of nature on the premise that the savage man had natural rights in the state of nature. Both philosophers followed the same train of thought: the state of nature, the development of property, the need for the social contract, the civil society that was created, and the governments that formed in those societies. They differ in that Rousseau believed that people left the state of nature when they discovered the benefits of relying on each other for resources. The idea of property caused labor to become necessary; this created a need for a social contract, which formed civil society. Since civil society formed on communal values, it should come before the individual. The individual does not sustain the social contract, the group of individuals does. In…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism DBQ

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two forms of government that were used during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of governments were effective in there own ways, absolutism was more effective. Machiavelli wrote "The Prince" which was a simply a textbook on monarchy. He said the best way to rule was to be feared. Machiavelli wrote in his book that "Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it" (Document 1). King James I also believed that absolutism was the way to rule. He thought that kings were like gods therefore he believed in divine right. Divine Right is the authority to rule directly from God. "The state of monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods" (Document 2). Another person that ruled in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He felt that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law. He was not very popular because John Locke overshadowed him. Hobbes wrote a book named "Leviathan" says that life would be constant warfare without a strong government to control…

    • 562 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau added to the idea of democracy by creating the idea that people are born good but can be corrupted by society, therefore they need to make the laws themselves and willingly obey them. He believed that if left to itself, society would follow these equally created laws and society would maintain its naturally born goodness. He believes that only the general society is capable enough to run themselves with laws created by the people for the people. Much of these ideas are still around today combined with other ideas in our own…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment was a movement deeply rooted in politics. Up until the early 1600s the power and authority of the monarch had never been challenged. At the start of this period different theories and political concepts were beginning to emerge. Concepts such as Jean Jacques Rousseau's social contract and ideas from prominent figures of the period such as Adam Smith and John Locke challenged the absolute monarchy and willed to put more power in the hands of the people. Traditional…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since there were more discoveries in science, European thinkers such as Hobbes, Locke, and Wollstonecraft had huge impacts on the government and human life. They each had their separate ways of thinking and perusing things. Human life was obviously the problem and each of them had different perspectives on dealing with the issue.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After England had their Civil War and Restoration there was a great deal of confusion on how the country should be govern. During this time two individuals published their thoughts on the issue. Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were in a social contract with the government. On the other hand John Locke believed that human were natural liberals. Both had very different ideas on how the nation should be govern.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are three vital political thinkers who have made a distinctive contribution and finest exemplar to the idea on state of nature and the social contract. Prior to the establishment of the social contract, men lived in the condition termed as the state of nature. Heywood (2013) defines state of nature as a society without the presence of any political authority and of legal checks on each individual to regulate them. These political thinkers however made a contrasting view on the characteristic of men in the state of nature and also on the reasoning for the formation of government due to the time that this trio lived in. Hobbes lived during the time of Britain’s Civil War whereas Locke lived…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most of these governmental officials were very highly educated and were inspired to develop their own ideas. These officials began to have their own ideas about how government should be run: “Encouraged and instructed by these officials, some absolutists rulers tried to reform their governments in accordance with Enlightenment ideals”(Mckay, 529). This led to what historians now call enlightened absolutism. Enlightened absolutism describes the monarchs of the Enlightenment that began to reform absolute monarchy to fit in with beliefs that emerged from the Enlightenment. These reformations eventually lead to major changes in different governments and allowed new forms of governments to surface around the…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately they both agree that the power of community provides protection to the people and that there is no freedom where there is no law. I think a combination of their ideas may be the best for an ideal government. One of the most important concepts that came out of Locke and Rousseau is the idea of personal freedom and liberties, which many democracies operate on…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Influence On John Locke

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Locke was a British Philosopher born on 1632 and died in 1704. He wrote The Two Treatises of Government which was a major contribution to political theory. He defended the belief that ”that man are by nature free and equal against claims that God had made all people naturally subject to a monarch,” (Tuckness 2005). In other words, he is saying that someone isn’t chosen to rule by God but we all have equal rights. What locke means by natural rights is the right to life, liberty and, property. Locke also believed that people should promote the public goods and if that is not met then the government can be resisted and overthrown (Tuckness 2005). According to Locke's Political Philosophy, “Locke also defends the principle of majority rule…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke And Rousseau

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Freedom, in general, is “the power or right to act, speak or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint.” The concept of freedom is integral to understanding the political theories of both John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau. Both Locke and Rousseau begin their social contract theories in the state of nature. The state of nature, as explained by Locke, is “a state of perfect freedom” wherein people are at liberty to “order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons, as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature” and are not dependent on one another. Locke states that people have the natural right to life, liberty, and property, and every individual has the right to preserve their rights and punish those…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When God made the earth, he gave the lands to men and their children. To maintain order God had commanded people to work and flourish equally. With this said, Locke proposed that “men as a whole own the earth and all inferior creatures, every •·individual· man has a property in his own person; this is something that nobody else has any right to. “(27)…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neither Jean-Jacques Rousseau nor John Locke would agree with a statement declaring that political and economic liberalism have not made us better off, rather they have worsened our situation. Rousseau and Locke both believe that while the government should implement laws, it is their job to only implement laws that the civil society as a whole have agreed upon and by doing so, allows individuals to both protect themselves and remain liberated. Since the definitions contained in their individual writings are distinct from one another,…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays