Louis XVI’s rule was defiantly not similar to the Rule of Napoleons rule when you get down to the basics. Louis XVI and Napoleon Bonaparte were two of the most significant rulers in French history for many different reasons. Being so young the inexperienced Louis XVI led France into the beginning of a bloody French Revolution. Napoleon on the other hand launched France to the top in Europe shortly after. Louis XVI and Napoleon differed in three main categories including: qualifications, domestic policy, and foreign policy. Napoleon Bonaparte was much more qualified to become the leader of France than Louis XVI was. After the death of his father, Louis XVI was given control of France at the young age of fifteen. This was surprising considering as a child Louis XVI showed no signs of leadership, often described as awkward and naïve. “If you abandon me in this great enterprise I shall work alone for the welfare of my peoples…I shall consider myself as their only true representative. None of …show more content…
Louis XVI’s old regime took away about 98 percent of the French populations’ rights (Doc.7). The lower class during the rule of Louis XVI’s reign had absolutely no rights; they were on the bottom of the food chain. All of the money and power belonged to the aristocracy, or the first and second estates (Doc.9). After the French Revolution ended the old regime, Napoleon Bonaparte established the Napoleonic Code. Napoleon’s new laws kept many of the ideals the French Revolution had been fought for including equality and the opportunity for economic prosperity (Doc.8). Although, there was a down side to the Napoleonic code because women and children were no included and lost the rights they had gained during the French Revolution. All in all Napoleons domestic policy gave rights to many men in France, while Louis XVI’s old regime did not allow for economic and social