Preview

Comparative Federalism: Us V Canada

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
988 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparative Federalism: Us V Canada
Diana Serene-Petitt
Federal Government 2035-SP2011
Kathy Ritchey
02.21.2011
(WORD COUNT-949)

Comparative Federalism:
The United States of America VS Canada

The federalism system of governments in the United States and Canada are basically the same in that both are governments that have a constitution and divide power between central and regional governments. However, beyond this very basic description, they vary greatly. The initial difference is obvious in that the U.S. is a republic, and the Canadian system is a monarchy. This means that we have an elected president to lead our democracy, and in Canada, they have a Queen or other inherent figurehead. As with any democracy, many nuances and subtleties differentiate and make parallel the two.
In a democracy government officials get elected, as they are in both of the countries that I will attempt to compare and contrast. They each have various levels of government that separate levels of power. The officials elected are responsible to the citizens that have elected them in that they must dutifully represent the wishes of the people in the conducts of their business. In both countries, the levels and tiers of government resemble each other, even in that they both have cabinets to oversee large sections of government, such as financial, health, defense, and environmental concerns. Both systems allow for liberal autonomy in their provinces or states. The officials can filibuster, though in the U.S. time is not limited as it is in Canada. However, most of the direct likenesses end there.
There are many differences in the two types of governments, but some are more striking to me than others are. For instance, in Canada, political election campaigns are limited in their length to no more than 35 days, the funding for the campaigns is extremely limited, and most of it comes from the tax coffers in that country. Most of their leaders have no personal fortunes, nor do they spend what they may have in electoral



Cited: Elkins, David J. “Any Lessons for Us in Australia’s Debate?”. Institute for Research on Public Policy. IRPP.org. May 1999. http://www.irpp.org/po/archive/may99/elkins.pdf. 11 Jan 2011 Forsey, Eugene. How Canadians Govern Themselves. Ottawa. Library of Parliament by the Minister of Public Works. Seventh Edition. 2010. Print. McKenty, Neil. “American Presidential Politics--A View from the North”. 28 Aug. 2007 EzineArticles.com. 18 Feb. 2011. <http://ezinearticles.com/?American-Presidential-Politics---A-Vew-from-the-North&id=707629>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When comparing the communist nation of China with the democratic nation of Australia many differences are apparent. The application of the legislative (law making and modifying function), executive (administrative function) and judiciary (law enforcing and dispute resolving function) is vastly different between the two nations as can see when we compare and contrast the underlying principles of each system of government. Firstly, both nations claim to uphold the concept of the rule of law, although due to corruptive forces surrounding the Chinese court system, this concept is often thwarted and equality before the law is not upheld. Within the constitutions of both nations the basic principles of separation of powers have been applied; however on examination of the practice of separation within the nations we find that convention (in the case of Australia) and the corruptive influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have not allowed such separation. Finally, the representation of the people by each nation’s governments will be compared through examining contrasting election and law making practices. With reference to the three arms of government, the comparisons made between the underlying principles of both China and Australia’s systems of government will support the understanding that democratic nations are a government of the people, by the people, for the people; making them just, whilst communist nations often struggle to provide the same justice and citizen involvement in their political process.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Badeaux, Guy , Mike Duffy, and Charles Gordon. Portfoolio '88: the year in Canadian caricature.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many distinctive differences between post-revolutionary France, the United States’ version of democracy, and that of Ancient Greece. A main difference between the United States’ democracy, and post revolutionary France is that France uses a parliamentary system. “Appointed by the President of the Republic (Head of State), the Prime Minister is the Head of Government” (“How the Government Works”). The prime minister of France is in charge of the laws in France. In the United States, laws are dealt with by the legislative branch, and in Ancient Greece’s democracy, laws were dealt with the Assembly. Another difference between the three governments is the way that their leaders are elected. The United States elects their leader using…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There was consensus that greater trust, ‘strategic pragmatism’ and improved intergovernmental relations were needed to reform federalism and provide enhanced policy outcomes for the Australian community. (149)…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism is the type of government where there is segment of different powers between a state government and the central government. The United States is a federalist government where the states have their own individual powers and authority that they are able to exercise and the federal government has its own circle of authority that it tends to exercise.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Canada and Germany are countries that have different political ideologies also they have some parts of government bear similarities.Although they are two different country, there are have three clear difference between two government systems they use.First, Canada has a three parts of parliament,with House of Common, Senate and Government Governor. In contrast, Germany only have two parts of parliament,with a Bundestag and Bundersrat.Secondly, Canada is president have power, but in Germany is Chancellor.Finally, compare advantage and disadvantage of two government system, Germany’s goverment system is more…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalism, as defined by The Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is “the distribution of power in an organization (as a government) between a central authority and the constituent units”. A more basic definition of federalism is the sharing of power between the national government and the State government. The Federalist Party is thought to have been started by Alexander Hamilton in an attempt to form a strong central government. Today, there have been two types of federalism, dual and cooperative. Dual Federalism was the first of the two and it lasted about one hundred and fifty years ranging from the 1780’s to the 1930’s. Cooperative Federalism then began in the 1930’s and lasted until the 1970’s. I feel as if dual federalism was good for its time period but I believe it would cause harm in today’s society.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Congress is a bicameral legislature that includes the House of Representatives (435 members representing the population) and the Senate (100 members representing the states)…

    • 2005 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two countries I have chosen to compare are China and Canada. Their systems of government are very different and have different powers and rolls in their country. Canada has a system of government very similar to our own. While china's government appears to be similar as well, but it is quite different. Canada's government democratic and is parliamentary in form but, very much like our own. Like all large governments it is representative democracy. Canada has a central government designed to deal with the country as a whole. Things like national defense, banking, currency, and commerce are controlled by the central government. All other matters are left to the provinces to deal with. Such as education, hospitals, and civil rights are responsibilities of the states. The Canadian Parliament consists of two houses. Their Senate is made up of 104 members who serve until the age of seventy-five. The House of Commons is composed of 295 members who are popularly elected to serve for five-year terms. The Parliament elects the executive, the Prime Minister. Canada has a Federal system and is divided into ten provinces that have powers the way our states do. China's government is a dictatorship it is led by the communist party. A premier who is now Li Peng leads the country. The Executive powers rest in the State Council, which is headed by the premier, Li Peng. The National People's Congress is the most powerful part of China's government. Its members are indirectly elected to serve five-year terms. One representative is elected from each province for every 400,000 people, with a minimum of ten representatives from each. There are approximately 3000 representatives in China's Congress. China also has a federal government. The country is divided into Provinces, which are divided into even smaller divisions of several types. The Communist party controls the government. Other parties do exist but the Communists Party is in control of the government. <br><br>Canada and China…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brooks, Stephen (2004) “Canadian Democracy – An Introduction 6th edition” Oxford University Press: Toronto. PP.187-189…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Electoral System In Canada

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A good government is a reflection of its citizens. The mechanics of a good government distinguish it from different governments around the world. However, how a government elects its leader is a big part of the way it runs in general. Many governments have different systems in which they elect their leader. In North America, electing a leader is a big responsibility for the citizens of that country. Particularly in Canada, our electoral system has been the same for many years and relies on the citizens to make a decision. Canada uses a system called first-past the-post or single member plurality . This system consists of a simple objective; to receive a majority of the votes . This system has worked well for many years without any major issues.…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Canadian History Essay

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter M. Leslie. REBUILDING THE RELATIONSHIP: QUEBEC AND ITS CONFEDERATION PARTNERS. Kingston: Queen’s University, 1987. Iigr. Web. 23 July 2011.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Parkin, A, Summers, J & Woodward, D 2006, Government, Politics, Power and Policy in Australia, 8th edn, Pearson Longman, NSW.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays