Preview

company law

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5144 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
company law
Faculty of Business and Management

BBUS2103
Company Law

January 2013

Companies Act 1965
Section 181: Member’s Remedy

Name: Mohd Afiq bin Sahar
NRIC No: 871226-43-5677
Matric No: 871226435677001

Pages
1. Introduction………………………………………………………………………….3
2. Example of oppressive, disregard of members’ interest and unfairly prejudicial or unfairly discriminatory conduct………………………………………5
Diversion of corporate assets or opportunity………………………………...5
Diversion of profits.………………………………………………………….6
Directors failure to act in the interest of the company……………………….7
Shares issued for improper purposes………………………………………....7
No dividend or inadequate dividend given…………………………………...8
3. The Circumstances Consideration……………………………………………………9
Irregular financial transaction………………………………………………...9
Breach of agreements to repay the loan……………………………………...10
Inaccessibility to the accounts……………………………………………….11
Removal of petitioner as director……………………………………………11
Failure to declare and pay dividends………………………………………...13
4. Recommendation on Section 181 – Member’s Remedy…………………………….14
5. Conclusions………………………………………………………………………….16
6. List of cases………………………………………………………………………….17
7. References…………………………………………………………………………...18
Introduction
The law has developed various remedies where the majority act unfairly or oppressively in order to protect the interests of the company and its member.
The common law remedies based on the rule in Foss v Harbottle and its exceptions are complex and place substantial difficulties upon members who complain of unfair treatment particularly when this involves breaches of directors’ duties.
Who may apply for a remedy?
Under s 181(1) an application for an order may be made by:
A debenture holder of a company.
A member of the company, even if the oppression action relates to an act or proposed act that is against the member in a capacity other than as a member as long as the oppressive conduct also affects him in



References: Committee on Company Law Amendment, (2010), Report of the Committee on Company Law Amendment (Command 6659). Retrieved from http://www.takeovers.gov.au/content/Resources/other_resources/Cohen_Committee.aspx KPT, (n.d), Law of Malaysia; Companies Act 1965, Retrived from http://jpt.mohe.gov.my/RUJUKAN/akta/akta%20syarikat.pdf Pamela Hanrahan, (2012), Commercial Applications of Company Law 2012 (13th Edition), CCH, Malaysia Wikipedia, (2013), Legal Remedy, Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_remedy

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The case I have chosen is Meras Engineering, INC., et al. (Plaintiffs) V. CH20, INC., et al., (Defendants). Meras Engineering is a provider of water treatment solutions. They develop products that treat industrial and agricultural water applications. CH20 is a similar company that provides clients with chemicals that control the biological fouling in cooling towers. Rich Beriner and Jay Sughroue were employed by CH20 and signed a non-compete agreement during their employment. They both left CH20 and went to work for Meras. According to their non-compete agreement from MERAS v. CH2O, INC Northern District of California (2013) “after they ceased working for CH20 they would not work for “any business of similar nature to that of [CH20] which is in competition with [CH20]” for the period of three years”…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Busting Trusts 1. Hepburn Act 2. Clayton Anti-Trust Act B. Protecting Consumers and Workers 1. Pure Food and Drug Act 2. Arbitration 3.…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    company law

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Issue: the issue about company’s constitution and whether the loan contract between ABC bank and Sambal Pty Ltd is invalid.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business law

    • 631 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This film was very interesting to watch. It made me realize how many frivolous lawsuits that have occurred. The Stella Liebeck case was huge example. Yes I understand she suffered third degree burns and had to be hospitalized for a week or so to recover but it could have possibly been prevented. The right thing to do would be to be careful when handling the cup of hot coffee. The cup itself says to be careful and why would anyone put a cup of hot coffee in between their legs especially being in the passenger seat where one could actually hold the cup in their hands which would have possibly prevented her from spilling hot coffee all over herself. The media won’t tell you that the actually cup itself melted from the hot coffee and therefore doesn’t give those who question this case a chance to see what really happened. This film seems to give a broad layout of what actually took place and why Stella Liebeck should be awarded for damages.…

    • 631 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages

    | Resource: Case Brief Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., et al. in Ch. 2, section 2-6, “Commerce Powers,” of the textWrite a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you define the functions and role of law in business and society. Discuss the functions and role of law in your past or present job or industry. Properly cite at least two references from your reading.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages

    80. As courts decide cases involving the Internet and new kinds of issues not addressed previously, what role, if any, does precedent play? What role should it play? What difficulties could arise?…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I m a miller wrapper at PERGO. We make flooring, wall bases, stairnoses, quarter rounds etc.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Law is based on moral and ethical principles of what are right, and it is the job of men and women, through study, to discover what these principles are.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. The plaintiffs are all citizens of a state or states different from the state or…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Facts: Mick, Keith, Charlie, Bill and Brian were directors and equal shareholder of Big Lips Music Pty Ltd. Brian resigned his directorship as a result of differences with Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie. The others wanted to get rid of Brian as a shareholder. However, Brian told them that he would never sell his shares in Big Lips Music. A general meeting of Big Lips Music’s shareholders is called at which there is a motion to insert a new clause in the company’s constitution that gives Mick, Keith, Bill and Charlie the right to compulsorily acquire Brian’s shares for their issue price. What is the process for inserting a new clause in the company’s constitution? Can Brian prevent the new clause being inserted even thought the others shareholders passed a special resolution that that effect? Required:  Student 1 ‐ Advise the other shareholders of Big Lips Music (the Plaintiffs) what is the process for inserting this new clause in the company’s constitution. If they insert this new clause can they acquire Brian’s shares for the issue price?  Student 2 ‐ Advise Brian (the Defendant) whether he can prevent the new clause being inserted by the other shareholders and if so how? If he can not prevent it will he have to sell his shares for their issue price? Parties The Majority  Mick – Director and shareholder  Keith – Director and shareholder  Charlie – Director and shareholder  Bill – Director and shareholder The Minority  Brian – Shareholder Issues…

    • 2193 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Redmond, P., Companies and Securities Law - Commentary and Materials, Law Book Co., Sydney, 5th, 2009.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Corporate Law

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Acknowledgement: These Tutorial Questions were originally devised by Martin Markovic, Senior Lecturer, Business School, University of Adelaide.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Employment Law Study Guide

    • 5115 Words
    • 16 Pages

    legal protections granted to employees seek to make the power relationshi p btwn employer + employee one that's fair and equitable…

    • 5115 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Two reasons require that analysis. First, the late Justice John Lehane challenged, rightly, those who assert that law and equity are fused to explain what they mean, how fusion happened and what flows from it.[23] And Justice Gummow has recently pointed out that ‘explanations have been slow in coming’.[24] Secondly, the fusion fallacy has recently been the subject of intense judicial scrutiny in the important decision of the New South Wales Court of Appeal in Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd (‘Harris’).[25] In breach of their contractual and fiduciary duties of loyalty, the defendants diverted projects away from the plaintiff, their employer. The trial judge found the defendants liable to pay equitable compensation or, at the election of the plaintiff, to account for profits. In addition, the trial judge made an award of exemplary damages against the defendants for their breach of fiduciary duty. By majority (Spigelman CJ and Heydon JA), the Court of Appeal reversed the trial judge’s decision, holding that there was no power to award exemplary damages for the breach of the fiduciary relationship in issue in the instant case.[26] The basis of the majority’s decision was that equitable relief does not pursue penal objective s,[27]…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    (a) The legal issue is can Delusions of Grandeur Ltd increases the dividend rate for preference shareholders from 7 per cent to 10 per cent immediately?…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays