Communism Vs. Capitalism
Throughout history, there have been many systems developed in order to have a better society and fair society. The question of what form of government or system is best has been brought up repeatedly during history and still is brought up nowadays. Two of the most debated, analyzed and argued about are Communism and Capitalism. Communism is a system of government where everyone and everything is considered equal, you work for the benefit of society. In other words, all the work you accomplish or funds you make go to the government where they make sure it is all redistributed equally to everyone. Two philosophers: Karl Marx and Freidrich Engels captured and theorized the basic concepts of communism. Vladimir Lenin went on to be the key founder
…show more content…
Vices against it do it harm. It does not come from nature of the system, but from the financial system that it is well known for. It helps the private sector dominate instead of serving society. It is the financial system that is the inevitable downfall of capitalism. The capitalist system is by definition, a system that meets the aspirations of human nature. We can, in fact, define capitalism as a system that recognizes and protects private property, free enterprise, freedom of personal choice, consumer sovereignty on production targets through the free market the product, chosen or ordered by the consumer guide, in fact, the production programs. But it is also flawed, it is not the way things are going on in a capitalist country. The capitalist system is narrowed to a minority, and not in its implementation. You cannot really say that a country living under a capitalist system when 1 percent of the population control the wealth of the rest who consider themselves as the bottom 99 percent. The Occupy movement (for example) put emphases on the social and economic inequality caused by capitalism. At first it was a valiant effort to voice the opinion of the un-wealthy but it ultimately led to nothing after the media circuit started to cover less and less about it and when the only people occupying the chosen spots were simply “hippies” (i.e. people who are opposed to the government and how things function) or people who had absolutely nothing better to do. The capitalist economy is not to blame, but instead, its extension into the private sector controlling the
Vices against it do it harm. It does not come from nature of the system, but from the financial system that it is well known for. It helps the private sector dominate instead of serving society. It is the financial system that is the inevitable downfall of capitalism. The capitalist system is by definition, a system that meets the aspirations of human nature. We can, in fact, define capitalism as a system that recognizes and protects private property, free enterprise, freedom of personal choice, consumer sovereignty on production targets through the free market the product, chosen or ordered by the consumer guide, in fact, the production programs. But it is also flawed, it is not the way things are going on in a capitalist country. The capitalist system is narrowed to a minority, and not in its implementation. You cannot really say that a country living under a capitalist system when 1 percent of the population control the wealth of the rest who consider themselves as the bottom 99 percent. The Occupy movement (for example) put emphases on the social and economic inequality caused by capitalism. At first it was a valiant effort to voice the opinion of the un-wealthy but it ultimately led to nothing after the media circuit started to cover less and less about it and when the only people occupying the chosen spots were simply “hippies” (i.e. people who are opposed to the government and how things function) or people who had absolutely nothing better to do. The capitalist economy is not to blame, but instead, its extension into the private sector controlling the