Preview

Communication Studies Ia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
767 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Communication Studies Ia
Ashanique watson Mr. Row Law October 7, 2012 “Equity does not destroy the Common law but assist it”. Explain the statement with reference to decided cases. Equity is a body of law that is found upon the principles of fairness and conscience. It piecemeal development took place over many years as a direct result of the injustices often caused by a strict application of the common law. However, equity does not destroy the common law but help and assist it. Equity has been developed two to there years after common law as a system to resolve disputes where damages are not a suitable remedy and to introduce fairness into the legal system. The principle of the equity was found on the concept of unconscionability, where an act or omission is used to contract to good conscience. In those situations equity will often step in and grant relief to the party whose disadvantage has been used to the advantage of another or whose trust has been breached. In the medieval period, the doctrine of precedent required the common law proceeding were commenced by the writ, that was only available in specified caused of his or her action within those categories, the common law court could not deal with it. National Provincial Bank Ltd v Ainsworth(1965) The House of Lords examined the deserted wife's

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Commentators and courts have noted that because certain equitable defenses were statutorily required to be tried by jury prior to the adoption of the 1894 Constitution, the deprivation of a jury trial for all equitable defenses is arguably unconstitutional. Under CPLR section 4101, when a plaintiff brings a legal action, the defendant’s equitable counterclaims should not be submitted to a jury. Under CPLR section 4102(c), when a plaintiff brings an action sounding in equity, the defendant’s legal counterclaims should be tried by a jury if so demanded. The counterclaims pled by a defendant enjoy the same careful analysis as the claims contained in the plaintiff’s complaint.…

    • 2857 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week1 Busn 420

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Furthermore, within the American legal system, there are both legal and equitable remedies available to both the plaintiff and the defendant in a case. The remedy provided depends upon the type of case being decided; for example, whether the case is of the civil or criminal nature. A legal remedy often enforces a right, imposes a penalty, or makes another court order to impose its will. Examples of a legal remedy include restitution paid to the victim of a crime or the imposing of a prison sentence upon a defendant. Equitable remedies are distinguished from legal remedies and are quite popular in the field of contract law. Equitable remedies may involve the use of an injunction, specific performance of a contract that…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Common Law Dbq

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Equity was developed over centuries but initially as a reaction to the “harshness of the common law or lack of developments in common law”. Furthermore, the common law system went unchanged for centuries and was a system were petitions were presented to the King for his grace in some complaint where “the usual royal answer was let him sue in common law”. In addition, complainants often complained about officials in respect of misconduct and unfairness.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In addition, injustice is found in law's 48, 53, and 54 in the area of property law. For example, “If a man has borrowed money to plant his fields and storm has flooded...not have to pay his creditor.” Furthermore, “If a man has opened a trench for irrigation and the waters have flooded the neighbor's field...restore..caused to be lost.” These examples show that laws are unjust because the storm was not caused by the creditor and the neighbor should be more careful where he has his crops.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Creation of U.S. Laws

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Cotterrell, R. & Michaolowski, R. Description and History of Common Law. Retrieved from http://www.radford.edu/~junnever/law/commonlaw.htm…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equity is defined as the sentencing principle that similar crimes and similar criminals should be treated alike. (Frank Schmalleger, 2007)Equity in sentencing has been an issue for quite a while. It has sparked heated discussions in the U.S. Congress, as well as arguments among community members. Supporters of equity in sentencing try to inspire changes to our current legislation, and its opponents are attempting to abolish it in its entirety.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The term equitable remedy comes from the old English court system where there were two courts: courts of chancery and courts of law. Under this system, people would go to courts of chancery if the law didn't really provide them with relief but they still believed they had been wronged. Equitable remedies were and still are about what is fair and right…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fusion Fallacy

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Prior to the enactment of the Judicature Act 1873, the administration of common law and equity was completely separated. The principles of equity developed in the Court of the Chancery where a ‘petitioner could seek relief from the harsh or unjust operation of the law’.[3] The Chancery Court was a court of conscience charged with ‘an extraordinary power to prevent the injustices and supply the deficiencies that were perceived in the operation of the Common Law’.[4] The disadvantage of this system was that courts of law refused to recognise equitable rights or interests. The Judicature Act 1873 was enacted in order to merge the administration of law and equity. The effect of the Act was the abolition of the old courts and the creation of a new High Court of Justice that combined the jurisdiction of the old courts.[5] The judicature system was implemented in WA by enacting in the Supreme Court Act 1880 (WA) provisions equivalent to the Act. These provisions are now located in sections 16(1), 24 and 25 of the Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA).…

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Three Certainties

    • 6499 Words
    • 26 Pages

    Equity looks to intent, rather than form. This is a question of construction of the relevant documents or of gathering inferences from the words or conduct of the alleged settlor, considering all the circumstances of the case.…

    • 6499 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Equity and Trust Coursework

    • 3605 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Unlike the common law, which has a set boundary of rules and regulations, equity does not have a concrete structure due to its complex historical background[1]. Trust, governed by the laws of equity, is a unique creation of common law and is often dealt with challenging and versatile series of events. This problem involves complex areas from topics of formalities, constitution of trusts, and covenants to settle. In this essay, I will fully concentrate on whether each section of the trust is enforceable, and the effects that the 2006 will could have brought about towards the trust.…

    • 3605 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal precedent recognizes the value of the past. Yet the judiciary is engaged in evaluating legal precedent as applied to contemporary cases. Inevitably, the role of common law in recognizing and altering precedent as applied to contemporary cases results in the creation of new precedents, which in turn will be evaluated in the future. Common law might be bound by general social principles in legal contexts, but it inevitably places the judiciary in the role of evaluating the continued relevance of those principles as new legal contexts emerge through civil…

    • 3787 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is an error to circumscribe equity 's jurisdiction by supposing that equitable fraud can be specifically defined, or that classes of case in which it has been found to exist are mutually exclusive, or by concluding that an element such as inadequacy of consideration or disadvantage resulting from a transaction which influenced a court to relieve in a particular case, is always essential, or that any one element, such as the presence of independent advice, which supported a refusal of relief in a particular case, will always be decisive. The prescription of certain elements, proof of which by the plaintiff is to place an "onus of justification" on the transaction of the defendant cannot make predictable decisions which depend on all the circumstances of the particular case and which necessarily involve an element of impression. It therefore seems more profitable, outside the statutory contexts in which unconscionability is made a specific ground for relief, to approach unconscionability as a component of the general jurisdiction of the courts to grant relief in cases of equitable fraud, and to see unconscionable conduct as a circumstance which may attract the exercise of that…

    • 4422 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Banking Law Assignment

    • 2517 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Equity was introduced to act as an enhancement of common law, commonly known as the second great subdivision of English law. Equity’s foundation is a judicial assessment of justice in contrast to the sometimes harsh and inflexible rule of common law. Historically, common law was known as the law, in contrast with equity. Equity sets aside contracts in the event of a party gaining a benefit through undue influence which is when an agreement is obtained by indecent pressure which is not duress at common law since no factor of violence to the individual was involved" (GH Treitel, The Law of Contract).…

    • 2517 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Equity simply means fair, just, and reasonable. Back in the days they use to have the chancellor's darling, where normally you would go to the of law for an issue, and the court of law would provide a remedy; and if you are not satisfied then it goes to the chancellor. You will then petition lord chancellor to intervene in the decision of the court of law. Lord chancellor would the change the decision of the court, causing rivalry, and this is where the "judicature act 1873",came to fuse the beaches of laws which were, equity and law. Equity steps in when common law is unable to provide adequate remedy, for in such a case as; Audrey has a land and during marriage she and her husband build on the land, when time comes for a divorce they go to the court, and common would say everything belongs to Audrey because the title of property is in her name, however equity would say no; because Raymond contributed to the purchase price and also helped with the maintenance of both house and land, he will receive what he deserves. They are cases where equity won't step such as, where there is a third party, cause the rule of equity states "one must come to court with clean hands". Being that equity was developed hundreds of years ago, I strongly believe that it is a good thing because it provides reasonable rights for Litigants as a way to show fairness, whereby common law is unfair, in others (audi alteram partem) they do not listen to the other side they were unreasonable. However, there is a penalty for disobeying equitable 'common injunction ' such as, imprisonment for enforcing a common law judgement.…

    • 299 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communication Studies

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1900s–1920sThough the study of communication reaches back to antiquity and beyond, early twentieth-century work by Charles Horton Cooley, Walter Lippmann, and John Dewey has been of particular importance for the academic discipline as it stands today in the United States. In his 1909 Social Organization: a Study of the Larger Mind, Cooley defines communication as "the mechanism through which human relations exist and develop—all the symbols of the mind, together with the means of conveying them through space and preserving them in time." This view, which has subsequently been largely marginalized in sociology, gave processes of communication a central and constitutive place in the study of social relations. Public Opinion, published in 1922 by Walter Lippmann, couples this view of the constitutive importance of communication with a fear that the rise of new technologies and institutions of mass communication allowed for the manufacture of consent and generated dissonance between what he called 'the world outside and the pictures in our heads' on a scale that made democracy as classically conceived almost impossible to realize. John Dewey's 1927 The Public and its Problems drew on the same view of communications, but coupled it instead with an optimistic progressive and democratic reform agenda, arguing famously "communication can alone create a great community".…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics