Preview

Cohabitation Before Marriage

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
844 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cohabitation Before Marriage
Cohabitation Before Marriage

Nakia Davis

John Tyler Community College

COHABITATION BEFORE MARRIAGE

Abstract In past generations, cohabitation has not been the most popular type of relationship, and some of our elders often refer to it as, “sinful.” In recent years, this intimate partnership has increased tremendously, and is preferred by more than fifty percent of American couples, and the rates are even higher among adults with failed marriages, according to the U.S Census Bureau in 2009. (Berk, 2010). This review examines how and why couples of today’s society choose to cohabit, as opposed to the traditional way of being married first. Through this study, a young couple is interviewed to show how living together before marriage can be a successful way to a long-lasting, and fulfilling relationship. This research also lists the pros and cons of couples sharing a home, finances, and other assets before forming a legal, civil union, and children.

COHABITATION BEFORE MARRIAGE 1

Cohabitation Before Marriage Cohabitation refers to the lifestyle of unmarried couples who have a sexually intimate relationship and who share a residence. (Berk, 2010). Most couples in the United States prefer this method of intimacy over marriage. One article states that living together in a romantic relationship without being married is the most common first co residential union in the United States, and that two-thirds of recently married individuals have cohabited. (Vespa & Painter, 2011). Earlier research showed that couples who cohabited before they were engaged to be married were more likely to divorce than couples who waited to live together until after they were married. (Berk, 2010). This may have been true before, but new studies have been performed that shows cohabitation has little or no affect on the divorce rate. A study was conducted by the Center for Disease Control and



References: Berk, Laura, (2010). The Diversity of Adult Lifestyles. Cohabitation (pp. 384-385). Boston, MA Vespa, Johnathan; Painter, Matthew. (2011); Cohabitation history, marriage, and wealth accumulation. Vol. 48, Issue 3, p 983- 1004. The Associated Press, (2012). Cohabitation Before Marriage? Its’s No Greater Divorce Risk. [Electronic Version] www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2012/0322

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In order to assess reasons for the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation; it is necessary to first establish the term marriage and cohabitation. Marriage is traditionally conceived to be a legally recognized relationship, between two consenting adults, that carries certain rights and obligations. Cohabitation is an arrangement whereby couples who are not legally married live together in partnership within the common law. Cohabitation has become so widespread that the term itself is now rarely used. I will now critically examine the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation in the last 40 years or so.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Your life can set up a disaster or can make it worth so much. In David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s article “The State of Our Union,” the topic of marriage and divorce are discussed. This paper shows and discusses the chances of divorce, the statistics on cohabitation, and economic benefits of being married. This paper is a summary of the article. This topic is important because it affects our everyday lives (Popenoe and Whitehead 390-402).…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last 40 years marriage rates have declined significantly while the number of couple’s cohabitating has risen rapidly. This is due to our changing society where equality, laws, social acceptance and religions have all contributed into the way we view marriage and relationships. In the 1970’s there were around 400,000 first marriages whereas, in 2011, there were 248,000. The average ages of people getting married have also increased from 25 for men and 23 for women in 1961 to 36 for men and 33 for women in 2011. Cohabitation is a big factor in the decreasing number of marriages with people using it as either an alternative to marriage entirely, or a ‘trial marriage’ which just delays the time of a couple’s marriage.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neil does bring in some premises that are relevant to that. Neil brings up some states showing that children born to cohabiting parents experience separation of their parents before the age of “16” at “75%” compared to those married at around “one third” . If it was demonstrated that a separation of parents lead to a negative impacts in a child’s life and behavior then the premise might stand. Unfortunately since so few cohabiting couples decide to have children that the net parent separation rate bellow 16% is probably higher for married couples. Neil states that women are more likely to face “physical and sexual abuse” when living in cohabitation compared to a marriage. Neil fails to bring any stats or proof to that claim or anything thing showing that cohabitation is the cause and not just in correlation. An argument is made that relationships will not be as good as married relationships because the partners will not be “genuine and authentic” due to the thinking that “their partner may bolt at the first sign of trouble.” One could rebut that be not having this security would make both partners put more effort into maintaining the relationship due to the fact that they know their partner can leave much more easily. I find it hard to believe that married people are “emotionally, physically, financially, and vocationally” better off because the apparent studies are not listed and we are not informed in what way those statistics were…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past forty years marriage, divorce and cohabitation rates have fluctuated significantly. For example, the number of divorces has increased from 27,000 in 1961 to 153,000 by 2006, whilst the Telegraph newspaper reported that ‘one in six people are cohabiting as marriage rates decline’. Why is this? There are multiple reasons for these varying statistics.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Popenoe

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s evolved thesis statement is, “ Americans are living longer, marrying later, exiting marriages more quickly, and choosing to live together before marriage, after marriage, in between marriages, and as an alternative to marriage,” (27). More and more people are getting divorced each year. There are a lot of people who never get married and live either single or unmarried. The “State of the Union” shows how divorce and living style of marriage has…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turner, R. “Rising Prevalence of Cohabitation In United States May have Partially Offset Decline in Marriage Rates.” Family Planning Perspectives 22.2 (1990): 90-91. CINAHL with Full Text. Web. 1 Oct. 2012…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We typically commit one person at a time. From an evolutionary perspective, monogamous pairing makes sense (parents who cooperated to nurture children more often passed on their genes to future generation). Bonds of love are most satisfying and enduring with a similarity of interests and values, emotional and material spot, and intimate self-disclosure. Those who commit with marriage more often endure, esp. after age 20. The divorce rate is 2x higher than 40 years ago, reflecting women's lessened economic dependence and people's rising expectations. Studies show that those who live together before marriage have higher rates of divorce and marital dysfunction because cohabiters tend to be initially less committed to the ideal of enduring marriage and then they become even less supporting during the…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examine the reasons for the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation in the last 40 years or so.…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1960 less than a half a million people cohabitated. Today that number is closer to five million people along with another half a million same sex couples living together. During the 1990s fifty-six percent of the marriages that occurred were preceded by living together first. There is greater than a fifty percent chance that a woman will marry if she has lived with the man for more than five years. More than half of high school seniors’ believe that it is a good idea to live together before marriage. If you are divorced you are more likely to cohabitate. There are advantages to living together before you are married. Economically it may provide a better life for the two people to be able share household expenses. People who are on public assistance may lose that assistance if they are married. College students may choose to live with their significant other secretly as to not lose their parents assistance. It also provides people with a way to share a life without the legal entanglements of marriage. Some people believe that cohabitation will strengthen their relationships and eventually lead to marriage. Other studies show that living together first show a divorce rate twice as high after ten years of marriage. Cohabitation may not actually be the cause of divorce though. Typically people who with less traditional views of marriage cohabitate together. Because they already value the idea less that may be what leads to eventual…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Divorce Rates in America

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The sanctity of marriage is a tradition that has been entered by generations over the past thousands of years. In the United States alone, 2,200,000 people choose to enter the lifetime commitment of marriage every year. Yet, less than half of that population is expected to keep that commitment. In a 1999 Rutgers University study, it is said that only 38 percent of Americans consider themselves happy in their married state, which has decreased from 53 percent 25 years ago. With the current, alarming statistic of over half of marriages resulting in divorce, there is much reason to take notice of how these numbers got so high. Although I personally have not grown up in a divorced household, I sought to understand why so many other people have, and in turn possibly gain knowledge to avoid becoming a part of the divorced population as well. In Steven Nock’s article, “America’s Divorce Problem,” he encloses the important point that “Divorce is not the problem, but rather a symptom of the problem” (1 Nock). With varying symptoms such as the feminist movement in the 1960s, an increase in financial dependence, increased career mobility, and the overall changed perception of marriage, the divorce rates have increased rapidly since the 1960s and deserve further explanation.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jennifer Roback Morse quoted “research shows that cohabitation is correlated with greater likelihood of domestic violence,”.There are also fears of divorce will also occur now that you are moved in with that person because you haven’t committed to marriage.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goodwin, P., & Mosher, C. A. (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth. Washington: National Center for Health Statistics.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neil Clark Warren in his essay “The Cohabitation Epidemic” starts by using tennis stars Andre Agassi and Steffi Graf’s case to mention the “cohabitation” issue and then quoting the data from the U.S Census Bureau and researcher Larry Bumpass to show that the number of people involved in cohabitation has significantly increased in the U.S in the last few decades. After that, Warren concludes that we should be alarmed over the recent increase of cohabiting couples. Before arguing against cohabitation, Warren introduces what kinds of people are cohabiting and why they are cohabiting. Followed by that, the author first uses the opinions from the bible to argue against cohabitation and then applies four strategies by comparing cohabitation and marriage to support marriage over cohabitation to lend the claim that a “ trial marriage” is unnecessary. Last, Warren uses the result from several studies to supplementally support the idea that there is no need for a “ trial marriage” because cohabiting couples have already known whether they should marry or not before making their final decisions and then restating his conclusion that the recent increase of cohabiting couples should cycle downward ( with our alarm over this issue ). After reading Warren’s essay, I think his essay should be unbelievable not only because there are a lot of fallacies involved but also because what Warren wrote about the comparisons between cohabitation and marriage tend to be weak to argue against cohabitation. One type of fallacy Warren used in his essay is false dilemma. This fallacy says “ there are only two alternatives to consider when there are actually more than two” (Lewis 187). For example, the author asserts “ people who cohabit fall into two categories” and then explains that either such people want to benefit from living together or treat cohabitation as a form of trial…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason is changing social attitudes. Religion regarded cohabitation as ‘living in sin’, but today there is less shame attached to it. Barlow et al found increasing acceptance of cohabitation. This shows that the change in religions social attitude, cohabitation is accepted more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some people prefer love that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and emotion rather than the duties of marriage. Giddens argues that there has been a trend towards confluent love. This love focuses on the intimacy, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that is in vows at marriage. When a marriage no longer has confluent love, the relationship is likely to end. This shows that monogamy may start being replaced by serial monogamy, in which cohabitation is most suited to. However, the ONS found that 60% of cohabiting couples will eventually end in marriage showing that monogamy can often replace serial monogamy. There is less pressure to follow traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has led to changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is less pressure to follow the norms and values around love and relationships set by family, religion or culture. This shows that the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or cohabitate. The acceptance of sex outside marriage has made it more likely that cohabitation will occur. Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made it possible for partners to cohabit without fear of pregnancy. This alongside the acceptance of sex before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes towards sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in cohabitation.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays