Preview

Case 7 Financial Detective

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1749 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case 7 Financial Detective
Health Products:

Company A is Johnson & Johnson, which is a diversified manufacturer of prescription pharmaceuticals, health and beauty aids, over-the-counter drugs, and medical devices. Company B is Pfizer Inc., which develops, manufactures, and markets patented pharmaceuticals such as Liptor and Celebrex. The most significant strategic differences between the two firms lie in their product mix and their customer focus. J&J sells most of its products directly to the consumer while Pfizer sells exclusively to doctors and institutions.

Firm B has intangibles worth more than twice as much as firm A, which may reflect firm’s B’s higher investment in R&D. Firm B may also have higher intangibles due to their ownership of patents and its investments in licensing arrangements.

Firm B’s gross margin is more than 12% higher than company A’s, which reflects the higher input costs for company A’s medical diagnostics and devices product segment.

Company A has a far quicker inventory turnover than company B. Company B sells almost exclusively to institutions and pharmacies, which usually take longer to exhaust their supplies compared to company A, who markets its consumer products to retailers, which have a higher turnover orientations.

Many of company A’s and B’s products are branded consumer products that command a price premium. However, company B’s premium is higher, reflecting the benefits of patent protection on prescription pharmaceuticals, and the additional returns needed to support company B’s large R&D efforts.

Beer:

Company C is Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc., which is a producer and marketer of a number of mass-market beers such as Budweiser, Michelob, and Busch. Company D is the Boston Beer Company, which is the seller of the popular Sam Adams line of beers. Boston beer’s products are part of a microbrew.

Company D’s proportion of cash and cash equivalents, which is extremely higher than company C’s show their conservative approach to its financial

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Accounting Quiz

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages

    14. Which financial ratio measures the extent to which the company's capital is in cash or cash equivalents? cash ratio…

    • 459 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Xacc280 Financial Analysis

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Investors and potential investors in these companies will look at and consider a multitude of information before deciding which of these two companies would be a better investment. For instance, most investors will look at each company’s current assets and liabilities amounts. In 2004, Coca-Cola had more than 12 million dollars in current assets, while PepsiCo showed only 8.6 million dollars in their current assets. In 2005, Coca-Cola faced a decrease while PepsiCo had an increase in current assets. PepsiCo recorded 10.4 million dollars in current assets, while Coca-Cola dropped to 10.2 million dollars. Their current liabilities faced similar comparisons. In 2004, Coca-Cola had 11.1 million dollars in current liabilities, and then dropped that number to 9.8 million dollars in 2005. This…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Company B is a large and have a high profile because sales value is high and it incurs heavy cost of advertisement expenses.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drug manufacturers need to regain access to these markets to protect themselves in a dynamic industry. In just a few years, from the early to the mid-1990s, the healthcare industry witnessed dramatic changes within its supply chain. Even if a merger did not bring about short term profits, like Eli Lilly and PCS, it still eliminates a deadly threat. Merck’s competitors were gaining ground by being placed on Medco formularies (Pg.16). If one of these companies were to get complete control, it could replace most of Merck’s products with its own. In a way, this acquisition was an investment to properly position Merck in an unpredictable future. If this future held a system in which the most drugs were sold through PBMs, or not, Merck would be positioned to continue their successful business. As one Merck-Medco put it “Our business is constantly changing.” (Pg. 19). This merger had to occur to create a company flexible and agile enough to adapt to a changes.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prescription drugs whose patents have expired are highly elastic; however, prescription drugs whose patents still exist are highly inelastic. Many consumers will substitute generic brands for drugs that have had their patents expire. These generic drugs can be produced at a much lower cost and yet still contain the active ingredients and FDA approval to their brand name equivalent. As a result, supply increases along with demand and puts downward pressure on price. Because there are no substitutes for patented drugs, consumers have no choice but to pay the higher prices determined by supply and demand…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Company A is Johnson and Johnson (J&J) as it is evident based on its financials. The cost of goods sold is twice as higher as Company B because J&J has a very broad range of products that would require many different resources and suppliers. J&J has a high inventory and receivables turnover mainly because it is reflecting its mass-marketing strategy. Also because J&J mass markets its broad line of products, they have high net fixed assets as they produce in large amounts of volume that would require many manufacturing facilities and equipment in order to produce all of their products. J&J has a much higher ratio of cash, short term investments and receivables that is evidence that it has cash on hand and large production facilities.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Generic brands have been profitable and cost efficient for buyers. This simply means that suppliers don’t need to offer a particular name brand; all they need have is the active ingredients that brand name suppliers that have the same function as name brand medications.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The two companies listed here manufacture and market health care products. The first is the world’s largest prescription-pharmaceutical company containing a broad pipeline of ethical pharmaceuticals backed by significant research and development, which has recently divested many of its non-related business holdings and is considered the partner of choice in terms of licensing agreements. The second company is a diversified health-products company that manufactures and mass markets a broad line of pharmaceuticals, over-the-counter drugs, health and beauty products and medical devices. Brand development and management is key to this company.…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    J is the software firm since it has substantial R&D investment relative to sales with a high gross margin since software is cheap to duplicate. Very low inventory since there is relatively little cash investment.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Financial Detective

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hardware and Tools: The first firm is company K and the second firm is company L because company L has higher SG&A expense and higher gross profit as seen in the financial data. This is due to company L selling via its own technical representatives and mobile franchise dealers.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plavix Case Study

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This case study illustrates the conflict between patent protection and preserving a pure competitive market. Pharmaceutical companies are granted patent rights to newly developed drugs for a limited amount of time. Through legal means they are able to form monopolies and maximize their profits. a parent company can move to delay the release of its generic comparison through legal and illegal measures. In the following case Bristol-Myers Squibb fell victim to their own anti-competitive practices.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pepcid Race to Market

    • 2860 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, the pharmaceutical industry began to experience a decline in sales. Many companies began to see the potential of the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market as a proactive and defensive strategy to counteract the generic threat and to reinvigorate market share growth from their existing product line. In 1989, Johnson & Johnson and Merck (“JJM”) joined forces in an effort to bolster both company’s portfolios. The joint venture brought “Merck’s research and development expertise and product portfolio with Johnson & Johnson's knowledge of consumer marketing and retail distribution” together. The intent of the venture was to improve development, manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of certain OTC consumer products in the United States and Canada.…

    • 2860 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Internal Analysis: Two internal strengths have been identified as key to Pfizer success; strong marketing and sales infrastructure and a massive war chest funded through successful product sales. In terms of marketing and sales infrastructure, Pfizer is able to reach into both domestic and international markets and penetrate future markets with Pfizer products, allowing them to continue to push their products into the market and build consumer relationships for future products. In addition, from successful drugs such as Lipitor and Viagra, Pfizer has accumulated a massive capital supply in the form of their “War Chest” that enables them to fund future research and development as well as giving them a financial advantage in future mergers and acquisitions of smaller firms to capitalize on those firms existing product offering, patents, and capabilities.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is easy to say that Company A has a higher ratio of cost of goods sold because of their substantial budget for research and development which is normal in a pharmaceutical company who creates their own products from research as opposed to Company B whose cost of goods sold is significantly lower, 11.1% to 23.9% because their over the counter and common products have no needed…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assessing the provided information about the two companies and looking deeply at some of the financial data, it was concluded that company 1 is designated by the letter H and company 2 is designated by the letter G in Exhibit 1 (see appendix 1). Investigating the financial data, it was found that Company 1 (H) had a higher inventories account of 38.6 this supports the fact that it is a traditional book store that needed to keep book inventories at all times to maintain its retail presence. This is further seen in its inventory turnover, is has a lower turnover of 2.42x this reflects the nature of the company which traditional book retailer that experience slow turnover. Moreover, company 1 (H) has an 11.1 in intangible assets, again this…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays