Preview

CSU Board Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1397 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CSU Board Case
1. CSU FOOTBALL STAFF: A. Coach shall be permitted a total of six staff members to facilitate his head coaching duties. Of the six staff members:

1. Coach will be entitled to choose a maximum of four staff members, with final approval by a simple majority of the CSU Board.

2. The remaining two staff members must be chosen from current members of the CSU Physical Education Department, or hired through a valid, committee determined process involving the CSU faculty.

B. Coach will be consulted on all six staff member salaries, with the final pay ruling determined by a simple majority of the CSU Board.

C. After one year of the CSU football program, all hiring and firings will be the sole discretion of Coach, subject to a simple majority
…show more content…
Termination. Upon suspension, Coach will have two weeks to meet with the CSU Board. If Coach fails to meet with the CSU Board, without an excused absence. Coach will be automatically terminated. Karin Mika retains the sole power of excusing a failure to appear in front of the CSU Board. If Coach fails to appeal, while failing to adhere to the punishment handed down by the CSU Board or the Attorney General mediator, it will result in a for cause termination. In the event this Agreement is terminated for cause, all obligations by CSU to make further payment or provide any other consideration hereunder shall cease as of the date of termination. In no case shall CSU be liable to Coach for the loss of any collateral business opportunities, benefits, perquisites, income or consequential damages suffered by Coach because of the CSU’s termination of this …show more content…
GOVERNING LAW: This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio, regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under applicable principles of conflict of laws thereof. CSU and Coach agree that the proper venue for any dispute arising from or related to employment shall be in Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

9. ASSIGNMENT: This Agreement shall endure to the benefit of, and shall be binding on, the CSU’s successors and assigns.

10. SEVERABILITY: If any provision of this Agreement is illegal or unenforceable, the other provisions will remain valid, binding, and enforceable.

11. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between CSU and Coach about all matters contained herein and incorporates and supersedes all prior agreements between the Parties concerning the employment of Coach by CSU. There are no other agreements, conditions, or representations, oral or written, express or implied, with regard thereto. This Agreement may be amended only in writing, signed by both Parties.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, having represented and warranted their authority to enter into and execute this Agreement, has executed this Agreement effective as of the last date written

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Law 421

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages

    What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract?…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Individual Assignment02

    • 988 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. Add new: Contracting Out Clause: The company will not contract out any work currently done by members of the bargaining unit without the written consent of the union. Under no circumstances will employees in the bargaining unit be laid off as a result of contracting out work.…

    • 988 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    IN CONSIDERATION OF the matters described above and of the mutual benefits and obligations set forth in this agreement, is agreed as follows:…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Big Time Toymaker

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract?” (Sean P. Melvin, 2011, p. 155). Factors in favor, is the payment of $25,000, the meeting when the oral agreement taken place, and the email sent from BTT manager. Factor that would be against is that there was no follow-up to obtain a contract in writing signed by both parties; also, BTT came under new management.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1987 the National Collegiate Athletic Association (N.C.A.A.) placed its harshest football punishment in history on Southern Methodist University (S.M.U.). The repeat violator rule, also known as the “death penalty,” banned the college from playing football for all of the 1987 and only allowed to play seven games in its 1988 season. They used S.M.U. as an example of what could happen when a college excessively violates N.C.A.A. regulations. The death penalty was the last option for the university because they were already on probation for past major violations with N.C.A.A. ("SMU Football Gets," 1987, p. 1C). The only thing left of S.M.U. after receiving ‘death’ was pick up the pieces and they are still trying to put the sport back together after so many years.…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title IX Case Study

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the lawsuit “Cohen v. Brown University,” the president and athletic director of Brown University were being charged due to discrimination against women in the grounds of intercollegiate athletics program. For many schools, men’s football program far exceeds the budget and receives many more sources than any other men’s program in most universities. The law came to existence in response to Brown University cutting off the women’s gymnastics and volleyball teams from university-funded varsity status to donor-funded varsity status, in May 1991. Simultaneously, men’s water polo and golf teams were also cut off and in consequence, their lost not only the university’s funds but all other privileges and benefits from Brown’s. “After hearing fourteen days of testimony, the district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction ordering that the women’s gymnastics and volleyball teams be reinstated to university-funded varsity status, and prohibiting Brown from eliminating or reducing the status or funding of any existing women’s intercollegiate varsity team until the case was resolved on the merits” (Thornton, 2011, p.512). Brown had initially 120 days to submit a plan to comply with Title IX, but failed in doing so and the district court modified the order to 60…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is usually a team of people who have the responsibility of running the school – they will be made up of a variety of people who have links with the school and local community. We have at least a parent governor and a staff governor in addition to the Head Teacher. They contribute to setting the aims and…

    • 1673 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deserve Compensation For Their Play In The College Athletic Arena.” Journal Of Law & Education 30.4 (2001):673-681. Index to Legal Periodicals & Books Full Text (H.W. Wilson). Web. 4 Mar. 2014.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Ultimately, this is a decision that will be made by the [CSU] Chancellor’s Office, and we will go along with whatever they decide,” Velasco said.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Title IX Research Paper

    • 1820 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Reynolds, Gerald. Letter to colleague; "Further Clarification of Intercollegiate Athletics Policy Guidance Regarding Title IX Compliance" (July 11, 2003)…

    • 1820 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Samuel, Ebenezer. "If Oregon Hit with NCAA Sanctions Then Chip Kelly Should Suffer Even Though He Bolted for NFL and Philadelphia Eagles." NY Daily News. NEW YORK DAILY NEWS, 19 Jan. 2013. Web. 8 May 2013.…

    • 3969 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    College Recruiting Reforms

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages

    College recruiting over the past two decades has been getting more intent on finding the most athletic or talented player, but willing to give up good character, discipline, and well set academic standards. Just recently has the NCAA made milestone reforms to the recruiting process, scholarships, and academic standards not only for individuals but teams as a whole. The new reforms and stipulations for players and coaches are well thought out and though they are cracking down on academic standards and misconduct it is fair in the same sense. College athletes should be held to the same standards as non-athletic scholars, if not higher because they are…

    • 1746 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheerleading Controversy

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Michael Herbst, now retired, was the athletic director at the time of the plaintiff’s injury. He will verify that there were no mandatory policies or procedures adopted by the Board that Marella was required to follow in her administration of cheerleading practice. He will also testify that the Connecticut Interscholastic Athletic Conference (“CIAC”), the general governing body of athletics in Connecticut schools, does not consider cheerleading a sport and does not promulgate any rules relating to cheerleading. Furthermore, he will testify that he maintained a calendar of where the cheerleading team was practicing on any given day, at the high school of GCA, and he authorized the team to practice there because it was a first class facility that Marella allowed the team to use free of charge. There is an arrangement for…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The NCAA has academic allegations against 20 schools. This has caused many schools to increase observation on their athletes academics. The NCAA has found many violations at UNC,wherein they have allegedly allowed university employees to do the students work or helping them out. A former basketball coach sold test answers to athletes around the country. Cases of alleged academic misconduct have arose concerning former members of the Texas Longhorns men's basketball team. One player allegedly took photos of questions on the final exam and sent them to someone who was not in that class to find the answers. Another incident at Texas was when their academic mentor admitted to helping an athlete finish a paper “that wasn’t really entirely his own. Another college was Syracuse University who was accused of academic fraud by the NCAA (“Academic Foul…”). Indiana University allows special admits as long as they could potentially graduate, even if they do not meet the school’s requirements. Former Indiana coach,Gerry DiNardo, had forty-two percent of the students did not meet requirements of the University. Thirty-one of fifty-five colleges admitted to allowing special admits into their colleges’(“Is the Special Treatment...”). According to Brad Wolverton, Weber State University is now on probation for 3 years and a reduction of their football scholarships after the Division l Committee found that a…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: On December 3, 1990, Vanderbilt and DiNardo executed an employment contract hiring DiNardo to be Vanderbilt's head football coach. On August 14, 1994, Paul Hoolahan, Vanderbilt's Athletic Director, went to Bell Buckle, Tennessee, where the football team was practicing, to talk to DiNardo about a contract extension. In November 1994, Louisiana State University contacted Vanderbilt in hopes of speaking with DiNardo about becoming the head football coach for L.S.U. Hoolahan gave DiNardo permission to speak to L.S.U. about the position. On December 12, 1994, DiNardo announced that he was accepting the L.S.U. position. Vanderbilt sent a demand letter to DiNardo seeking payment of liquidated damages under section eight of the contract. Vanderbilt believed that DiNardo was liable for three years of his net salary: one year under the original contract and two years under the Addendum. DiNardo did not respond to Vanderbilt's demand for payment.…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays