Preview

Berlin Crisis of 1961 from Perspective of Realism Theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Berlin Crisis of 1961 from Perspective of Realism Theory
Introduction Berlin Crisis of 1961 was the most dangerous moment of the Cold War. This conflict was mainly about the occupational status of Berlin. Berlin Crisis initially emerged in 1958 by the provocation of the Soviet Union. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev threatened to conclude a separate peace treaty with East Germany unless the western powers recognized the Germany Democratic Republic (GDR) (I. W. Trauschweizer, 2006). However, the escalation of tensions began after the Vienna Summit in June 1961, where the USSR again raised the issue of ultimatum, which gave the United States six months for the withdrawal of Western armed forces from West Berlin.
Berlin Crisis was not the only crisis during Cold War. Through the whole history of humanity there has always been a question why do wars and conflicts occur? In order to give an answer to this question we should explain some factors which made the war to occur. Crisis and especially Berlin Crisis can be understood from several perspectives, but in this paper it will be explained from realism theory perspective.
As a famous representative of realism theory, Waltz asked himself the question why do wars occur? “Waltz’s question is as old as war itself, possibly because “to explain how peace can be more readily achieved requires an understanding of the causes of war” (Waltz, 1959: 2). By the time Waltz posed this question, many answers to it already existed. These answers fell into three categories (or as IR theorists came to define them, were found at the three “levels of analysis” or in the “three images”). These three categories/levels/images are: the individual, the state, and the state system” (C. Weber, 2009, p. 17). These main causes of conflict will be represented in detail in the main body of the paper by the example of Berlin Crisis.
Although Waltz’s three categories of the causes of war explained many processes in the Berlin Crisis, there are also important points in the theory of realism, which



Bibliography: 1. Ingo, Wolfgang, Trauschweizer, Tanks at Checkpoint Charlie: Lucius Clay and the Berlin Crisis, 1961–62, Cold War History Vol. 6, No. 2, May 2006, Routledge, pp. 205–228 2. Weber, Cynthia, International Relations Theory A critical introduction, (2010) 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Third edition published by Routledge, pp. 13-23 3. Walt, Stephen M, International Relations: One World, Many Theories, Foreign Policy, (1998) Spring, pp. 31-32 4. Gearson, John P. S., The Berlin War Crisis: perspectives on Cold war Alliances, (2002), Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10010: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-43 5. Lunak, Petr, Khrushchev and the Berlin Crisis: Soviet Brinkmanship Seen From Inside, (2003), EBSCO Publishing, pp. 1-31 6. Donnelly, Jack, Realism and International Relations, (2004), The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press , pp. 6-43 7. Joseph, Jonathan, Wright, Colin, Scientific Realism and International Relations, (2010), Printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-31

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Big Crisis Dbq

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In post-war Berlin during November of 1948, various conflicts between the big Western Powers and the Soviet Union created tension between the two dominant powers. The United Nations created more tension than what was already present when they called on the leaders of Russia, United States, Great Britain, and France to “enter into “immediate conversations” to end the Berlin dispute” (UN ‘Big Crisis’). The United Nations tried to step in and demand the ending of the Berlin dispute, but this created tension between the Soviet Union and the big Western Powers because they both vetoed the decision of the Security Council. This demonstrates that neither side was going to surrender; therefore, the countries involved became tenser. In London, it was believed that the Berlin problem with the Soviet Union is only “one of many symptoms of the existing world tension” (UN ‘End Crisis’).…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Between the years 1958 and 1961, the dispute over Berlin (often known as the ‘Berlin Crisis’) was one of the main issues between the USA and USSR, and caused a considerable amount of growing tension between the two states. The dispute over Berlin was a continuing issue over who was to occupy Berlin, the capital city of Germany. The city was seen as an important area for both states and led to several conflict issues throughout the time period. It could be argued that this issue and the tension caused by this was the primary reason (or, the main reason) for the Cuban missile crisis in 1962. The Cuban missile crisis was an issue over the placement of nuclear weapons on the island of Cuba by the Soviet Union and brought the world closer than ever to nuclear war. However, the Cuban missile crisis cannot be solely blamed on the dispute over Berlin. Other reasons that could be linked to the development of the Cuban missile crisis include Bay of Pigs, the actions of individuals (such as Kennedy’s personal views and actions over Fidel Castro and Cuba), the existence of US Jupiter missiles in Turkey, the validity of storing Soviet missiles on Cuba and the need to close the missile gap. This essay will examine the significance of each of these possible causes and how far they affected the Cuban missile crisis, in comparison to the dispute over Berlin.…

    • 3914 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Berlin dispute was a pivotal factor throughout the cold war period and should be considered a primary cause of the Cuban crises. West Berlin was a enclave deep in East Germany. Its very existence repudiated the East German government’s claim to be the legitimate government of all of Germany. In 1948 and 1958 war had seemed near as the Soviet Union tried to force the west out. In 1961 the Berlin Wall had been built to prevent a mass exodus from East to West Germany, this was humiliating for the Soviets. Yet Khrushchev still wished to remove the western presence totally. Stalin was forced to resort to trapping people in East Berlin to stop them from escaping, not the best propaganda image for communism. The Soviet leadership was clearly intent on protecting Soviet interests at this juncture and viewed the west with increasing suspicion. It was a catalyst to conflict between the west and communist states and therefore a possible cause of the Cuban missile crisis. Khrushchev may have placed missiles in Cuba to use them as a bargaining tool with the US in hope that discussions would lead to the West staying out of Berlin, in exchange for the removal of the missiles in Cuba.…

    • 3288 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    HU4640 Project Part1

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kavalski, E. (2015). Encounters with World Affairs An Introduction to International Relations. (Online-Ausg. ed.). Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the war draws to a close and the USSR closes in on Berlin, the clash between Communism and capitalism becomes an unavoidable event. With an Allied victory, communist USSR would be a major player in determining the fate of postwar Europe. With differing societal beliefs between the capitalist west and communist USSR, the redrawing of Europe, particularly the division between West and East Berlin, left serious repercussions that played a definite impact on the Cold War.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cold War Dbq

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the late 1940’s, the United States and Soviet Union had become locked in a Cold War. For about forty-three years, although no war between the superpowers of the United States and the Soviet Union was ever officially declared, the leaders of the democratic West and the Communist East faced off against each other. The war was a dreadful time for both sides, keeping all citizens on edge. Many major events in global history including the rise of the Berlin Wall and the Cuban Missile Crisis were related to the Cold War.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Galante, P. (1965). The Berlin Wall. London: Arthur Baker Ltd.; 1St Edition edition (1965).…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Berlin Wall Fell

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Have you ever wondered what all happened in Berlin during the Cold war? Well in my paper I am going to explain all about Berlin and what happened there. The first thing I wanna cover is the sides and what they believed in. There were two sides to Berlin the West and the East. The East was controlled by the USSR and was a Communist state.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part of the reason that Berlin caused trouble was because it was divided in between western communist Germany, and eastern Germany. Some of the people in the western communist part wanted out of there and just simple crossed the boarder to eastern Germany. Naturally, the western part built a huge dividing wall between them to keep it's people locked inside. Eastern Germany didn't like that at all and they wanted the people to come over from the western side. So they tried to help them get over or around the wall. This created more problems in the beginning of the Cold War.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within this period however, marks the closest instances of the Cold War almost becoming a hot one. The authors cover all the major historiographical themes from an intelligence perspective – the Berlin Blockade, the Berlin Uprising, and the construction of the Berlin Wall. From their unique perspective as leading intelligence operatives, Murphy and Kondrashev tell the complete story of the Berlin Tunnel. Despite it’s limited scope, the book offers new material and extensive documentation. Making use of previously classified Soviet and American intelligence archives for the first time, Battleground Berlin is able to paint a clearer picture of what was really occurring at the time. In addition, existing analysis is drawn upon and strength and weaknesses of each interpretation analyzed, often comparatively, to offer readers multiple perspectives and provide a more general understanding of…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The one of theory in International Relations is the Neorealism as Waltz mentioned in his book “Theory of International Politics” (1979). Waltz became the first and most resolute reformer of political realism theory who has called in question a number of its postulates "from within" of the realism. His works and work of his supporters such as Robert Gilpin, John…

    • 2629 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Given the decreased amount of conflict in today’s world, there is still violence from those who oppose the liberal democratic “world community.” One may ask, how would a Classical Realist explain the “irrationality” behind these aggressors?? Unlike Liberalism, Classical Realism recognizes the need for theory to be in touch with concrete…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Carr, Morgenthau, Reinhold Niebuhr and George Kennan consider that international relations should be realistic, as opposed to the realistic ones, although, a few years later, R. Ashley discards realism because it is undermined by „international antinomies” and because it is far from being a „harmonious tradition”. M.J. Smith, Roger Speagle and K. Goldmann favour the same conclusion, claiming that this collection of ideas which are labelled „realism” is so vagne and incoerent that is wrong to believe in the very existence of Realism and of converging points of view.…

    • 5081 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The realist approach to international relations has its roots in the state 's pursuit of power and the outright importance of the state above all else. Realism states that international relations should not be studied as how things should be but as how they are. We can distinguish between the 'economic person ', the 'religious person ', the 'moral person ', the 'political person ' etc. In order to understand politics, we must study only the 'political person ' for example we should study the political actions of a statesman as a synonym of a state. The theory of political realism is based on the idea of a rational actor. We should compare the real events to this ideal, normative picture. Realism begins with the principle that states must act to preserve their security by amassing instruments of violence. Necessity prevails as the dominant concept in realist theory. The necessity of preserving immediate security and survival while overlooking the search for international harmony, the necessity of identifying the unavoidable constrictions on political choice, and the necessity of not pushing the boundaries of political change. Today 's notion of realism developed as a reaction to the idealism of liberalists after the First World War. Idealism puts forward morality, international law and international organization as opposed to power as the basis of international relations. Be it with its ancient philosophical inheritance, its critical analysis of utopian ideology or its influence on diplomacy, realism has secured an important part in the international relations of today. It might be thought that realism, being such an old and recognized theory is fairly easy to define, but looking at examples of representative definitions of realism by political theorists and scholars proves that there is a relative amount of diversity in the definition of realism.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays