Preview

Athenian and Spartan Government

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
298 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Athenian and Spartan Government
In Ancient Greece there were four forms of government that were practiced Monarchy's, Aristocracy, Oligarchy and Direct Democracy. In Ancient Athens they had a direct democracy which allowed the citizens to participate in political decision making. In Ancient Sparta they had an oligarchy form of government in which the state was ruled by a small group of citizens who also controlled the military.
<br>
<br>The political system of ancient Athens was a democracy, which involved all of its citizens by giving them daily access to civic affairs and political power. Both decision-making and decision-enforcing were the duty of every free adult male citizen, and not just of those elected by them or by their leaders. The free adult male citizens of Athens were directly involved not only in government matters but also in matters of justice, as there was no separation of powers in ancient Athens.
<br>
<br>Unlike the Athenian government the Spartans didn't use tyranny or any form Athenian democracy. Sparta did not like the way tyranny worked so they produced a different form of government. The Spartans formed a very complex government mixing democracy and oligarchy, and this form of government was a model for other poleis. The government was made up of three parts ruling class, the council of elders, the Ephorate, and the Assembly.
<br>
<br>For this specific time period the oligarchy government used in Sparta was better for the Ancient Greeks than the democratic government in Athens. The government in Athens worried more about the citizens of its city-state then its own well-being. The Spartan oligarchy may not have given its citizens a lot of freedom but it was successful in gaining attention and respect from the other Greeks and their rival

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Greek Civilization Dbq

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Part of Pericles’ plan for Athens was to increase the number of public officials with paid salaries and use direct democracy. Pericles plan for democracy was also for the poor to not be discriminated for social rankings. He also wanted the citizens to serve his country at any position on the social scale but you have to be a defined citizen. Pericles once stated “…power is in the hands not of a minority but of the whole people”. Athens went through a period of time of power struggles between the rich and poor. Today there are many countries that use democracy as a form of government.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the ages of 800 and 401 BCE, Athens and Sparta were very different in many ways, but in a couple of ways, they were somewhat similar. They both had wealthy aristocrats who controlled their government and who made decisions on what was “best” for their poleis and its people, and both used a political legislative system. While the Spartans had the elder council, called “Gerousia”, the Ephors and the general assembly, the Athenians had the legislative branch, called “Boule”, and the popular assembly. Whereas the Spartan’s general assembly could make laws and the Gerousia and the Ephors could veto them, the Athenians “Boule” could suggest laws, but the popular assembly was responsible for passing legislation into law or vetoing it. Both the Spartan’s general assembly and the Athenian’s popular assembly were made up of free male citizens in their respective city states.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of the major characteristics of Sparta that made it so unique was it 's government. Although oddly structured, it 's main goal was to achieve stability. This is one goal that many Greek city-states strived for but could never reach. Sparta had a dual monarchy with two kings. Underneath these kings was the council of elders, which consisted of twenty-eight nobles over the age of sixty, which was the retiring age of a Spartan soldier. These retired soldiers discussed law, foreign policy, and served as a supreme court in Sparta. Lower on the political ladder was an assembly made up of every noble male soldier in Sparta. This assembly was the closest thing to democracy in ancient Sparta. It had the right to democratically approve or veto the decisions of the council of elders. The major body of power in Spartan government however was known as the "ephorate". The ephorate was made up of five Spartan males who had veto power over all other governmental branches, control of the military, the educational system, and the infant selection system. Surprisingly enough, they even had the power to remove a king. These five men were kept in check by a Spartan code that limited them to a maximum term of one year and made them personally responsible for any of their actions while in power. Any member of the ephorate could potentially be put on trial after serving his term. All in all, the Spartan government was established…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China Dbq Essay

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Athens had a bit of a different form of government called a democracy. The citizens of Athens decided who would rule their country. “No man is kept out of public…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sparta vs Athens Dbq

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When it came to government the Spartan government was a very tough government it was an oligarchy and relied on farming and war. The Athenians government was an easier government being a democracy and relying on trading and focusing on arts and culture. In Sparta the government was an oligarchy an extremely tough government that was focused all around war. The Spartan government decisions were made by the kings and the elders. The Athenian government was a strong democracy run by the people. The philosopher Plato tried to reform the government and he wanted the government to get stronger for the people and was. In Doc. 5 it states how the more poor people there are that means the poor have more say in the government and this is what Plato strived for. In each document it shows the characteristics of each government in doc. 1 it explains how the elders and kings make the decisions and that is how it is an oligarchy. In Doc. 5 it explained how the people rule the government by how which class there in but it shows how the people have a say in the government unlike when a king and a select group of people run it.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Ancient Greece was spread out into the individual city-states, it forced them to each have their own forms of government. Their governments ranged from military rule to dictatorship to democracies. In Athens under the rule of Pericles, their government was a democracy. Any man over the age of 18, who wanted to, could be involved and got paid for being part of the government like people do today. This influenced our government because although we do nat participate directly in day to day government functions, we participate indirectly. Athens also had a jury, who in trials made the final decisions, like we do today. You also had the magistrates, who went out ald enforced the laws like we have police officers do today. Ancient Greeks have…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta's Decline

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After a long endeavor, Sparta arose victorious. Having crushed its rival Athens, Sparta took hegemonic control over most of the other Greek city-states. Rather than rule as an empire, Sparta chose to “exercise considerable influence over the domestic and foreign decisions of these independent states” (Hooker). The other city-states hated this as Sparta tended to uproot a lot of what the other cities had worked so diligently to build. In the case of Athens, Sparta “pulled down the democratic government and established an oligarchy” (Hooker). Not only were they sulking in the shame of their defeat, but they were subjected to what they would have considered a backwards and insulting form of government. Richard Hooker, in his article “The Spartan Hegemony,” says that this oligarchy ruled “with an iron fist, often ordering summary executions of political opponents,” and the local Athenians ended up dubbing them “the thirty tyrants.” This is the most extreme example of their broad mistreatment, but their hegemonic influence caused many of the other city-states to greatly resent them. Inarguably, Sparta’s controversial foreign policy decisions cost them many key allies and made them many…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The kind of government that Ancient Greece had was democracy, wherein everyone is given a chance to be heard and “the administration is in the hands of the many and not the few” (Reilly 91). This gave its citizens to have a say on the events and decisions that occur in the city. It is also a form of government where “aristocrats [were] stripped of all their powers except for certain judicial functions” (Bowra 93). Anyone was capable of being part of the government regardless of their job or their state and each part of Ancient Greece had their representatives to ensure that each part able to contribute and lead. This had a significant part to its rise to power because this form of government was able to develop a trust among its people and it was used as a means of being able to communicate effectively among the people of Ancient Greece.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens and Sparta in the ancient Greece world are both revered by many modern civilizations as being foundry influences on modern democracy. The two city states, however, were polar opposites in how they viewed democracy and ran their government. Sparta was known for its military prowess and power, while Athens has always been famed for its progress in the arts and sciences. While both being developmentally different and butting heads sometimes, they both were integral voices on how similar democratic societies ran their governments up until today. The defining differences between the two is that Athens was a heavily class based Democracy, compared to Sparta which was more definable as being an Oligarchy.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How Did Sparta Change

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While this system helped Sparta become the military powerhouse it was in ancient times, it did not help them create an environment in which a complex political system could grow. The Spartans decided to opt for a political system that was stable and a system that protected the people of Sparta. By using oligarchy as their form of government, the Spartans let the powerful few rule which stagnated the role of the everyday citizen in politics. Now those few powerful people controlled every aspect of life in Sparta. Even though Sparta did not have a government that thrived on the participation of its peoples, Sparta did have one unique characteristic that the other city-states did not have. Spartan women had a status of power and respect that was not seen in the ancient world. Spartan women were given almost the same rights as their male counter parts. The women were taught to read and wright, they were allowed to participate in sports, and Spartan women even had the ability to own land in society. Even though they had all these rights, Athenians still participated more in government. This is shown by the way Athens ran its government. An example of this is…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    n order to to participate in public life and make decisions affecting the community in Sparta it meant that you had to be a warrior. Sparta was a Oligarchy witch means "rule of the few". In Athens in order to participate in public life and make decisions you had to be native born, male and free. In Athens your political standing depended on you wealth. The men with the highest wealth could seek the highest political offices. The next step down the ladder were men with slightly less wealth referred to as the horse men. The horse men could serve in lesser political offices and join the army. The middle class could only be elected to low level political offices. The poor and the landless could vote but not hold office or be in the army however they could row the ships. Sparta had far fewer…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like Mesopotamia, Athens might be well known for their system of law and order. Athens saw the beginning of democracy and government like we know it today. In Athens, government now included citizens, not just representatives like in previous systems. For one of the first times in history, regular citizens could play key roles in how their community and government was…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ancient Athens was not truly democratic. First off, democracy is a system of government in which power is invested in the people who rule either directly or through freely elected represenative. An example of democracy; You have two treats, the dogs can pick only one treat to eat. I will let them both pick, and not only one. Democracy is equal. Ancient Athens wasn’t.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Greece is normally associated with the origin of democracy. Basically, Greek government evolved from single rule to small group rule to rule by the people. Because each city-state in ancient Greece possessed its own government, some of these types existed other than democracy, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy. This essay will compare and contrast the ancient governments, namely monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy in Ancient Greek city states.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greek Polis

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The development of the Greek polis--whether a military oligarchy in Sparta or democracy in Athens--allowed citizens to participate in political issues. This concept of the "rule by the people," mainly in Athens, gave the citizens a sense of freedom and harmony. Greeks applied the label "polis" to all of the states, regardless of their political distinctions, because each was a koinonia, a community.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays