Preview

Arguments Against Dualistic Interactionism In Chapter Five

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
300 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Dualistic Interactionism In Chapter Five
Dualistic Interactionism are one of the many theories that argues that two elements, which is the body and mind are separate yet have some sort of connection or interaction with each other. From what I believe, I do understand and accept the fact that we do have a physical body and that we do have a mind that is not physical, but I have a hard time justifying the concept that the mind and body are two different entities and then the body and mind can really interact with each other. I think the reason being for that is because there are so many crazy theories that are against this one and vice versa. But after reading about some of the concepts regarding dualism in Chapter 5, I can somewhat support some of the points that this theory does

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    A prime example of a dualist would be Plato; he believed that the body was gross and unthinking object that has cravings and desires and it connected to sensory illusions. But he believed that the soul was in fact a thoughtful and eternal and craves intellectual stimulation and philosophy and originated from the world of the forms. Plato thought that in time the soul would go back to its origin of the world of forms. He showed his view through an analogy of a charioteer; the charioteer is the soul controlling two horses which are the body and the mind. The horses have separate desires; the body desires sex, food, water and physical gratification but the mind wants philosophy, ideas, concepts and intellectual stimulation; the soul is the controlling force that ensures the chariot meets its destination. The major criticism with Plato’s theory is the idea that the soul is immortal and came from the world of forms; how is it possible that something can remember the life in the world of forms if it doesn’t have any senses in order for it to have remembered. Gilbert Ryle would criticise this view and agree with the statement as he believed a soul was much like ‘a ghost in a machine’ and this was a ‘categorical mistake’ and a mistake in language.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dualism and monism is a famous philosophy topic from ancient to now. The word "Dualism" means that our physical and our mental are independent. And our body and our mind cannot be the same. It is because of mind and body is two separate substances. In the contract, the "monism" means that both of the physical and mental are combined being one. And our mind and body are indivisible and are each influenced by the other. The monism and dualism individually has its strengths and weaknesses.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism Flaws

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes concludes that we are distinct from our body, and can exist without it. Seen from a modern materialist’s perspective, Descartes’ view is quite obviously wrong. However, assuming no knowledge of modern science, we should still be able to disprove his conclusion by looking for flaws in his reasoning in the text. In this essay, I will examine three relevant arguments Descartes presents in his sixth meditation and point out their flaws respectively.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Duality In Psycho

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Psycho is a 1960 horror film directed by Alfred Hitchcock starring Anthony Perkins, Janet Leigh, Vera Miles and John Gavin. The film is based on the 1959 novel of the same name by Robert Bloch. The main theme that Hitchcock tries to express to the audience is dual or split personalities. Everyone has a subconscious battle with good and evil; he shows this in many different ways using lighting, different camera techniques, mise-en-scene and silence. Also he used a string orchestra to add tension and drama as well as setting the tone for impending violence.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ap Psychology Quiz

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages

    In thinking about psychology and consciousness, the idea that the mind and the body are separate entities that interact makes a lot of sense to you. This view that you hold is most like the view of:…

    • 2654 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dualism consists of substances, which include corporeal things and thinking things. The essence of the mind is thought be the essence of the body but its extension. Human bodies and their properties are objects of sense perception. Minds and…

    • 2076 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Social Interactionism is the real trick that individuals use images to shape their own perspectives about the world. Social interactionists concentrate how individuals use images to add to their perspectives of the world and to speak with each other. William Ogburn was a humanist who bolstered typical interactionism. Images individuals inside of society to build up an association with each other and to help us to interface with each different too. "They examine up close and personal interactionists; they take a gander at how individuals work out their connections and how they bode well out of life and their place in it" Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer were both sociologists who bolstered the Functional Analysis hypothesis. This hypothesis…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay I will discuss Frank Jackson’s knowledge argument against physicalism. I will first of all outline what physicalism means and my understanding of it, followed by the different approaches to the mind-body problem such as dualism and monism. I will then look at arguments for and against Jackson’s theory before drawing to a conclusion. I will be discussing the theories outlined in Jackson’s paper Epiphenomenal Qualia and Thomas Nagel’s What it is it like to be a bat?, followed by a discussion on the ‘Philosophical Zombie’.…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early in the section of Churchland's essay entitled "Arguments Against Dualism," he poses the question, "Can the dualist tell us anything about the internal constitution of mind stuff? Of the non-material elements that make it up?" (Churchland, p.315). He goes on to reply that the dualists have made no such explanation. However, this interjection is begging the question since it involves the assumption that mind stuff consists of elements, and furthermore that such elements are comprehendible to the human mind.…

    • 299 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Dualism

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first argument I put forward to support dualism is; the brain and mind of human beings are different from each other. They both have unique properties and distinctive roles in human beings. The brain has definable characteristics that can be observed and analysed (Robinson, 2012, p.2). For example the activity of the brain when sleeping is examinable on electroencephalograms (Marieb & Hoehn, 2013, p.452). A magnetic resonance imaging reveals the location of different functions of the brain (Marieb & Hoehn, 2013, p.432¬). When dissected, the brain’s physical properties, such as size, shape and colour can be analysed (Robinson, 2012, p.2). On the other hand the mind is not discernible to science, it does not have physical properties like the brain. The mind is a mental awareness of the interactions occurring within and around the human body (Robinson, 2012, p.7). It observes and moderates our thoughts, emotions and reactions (Robinson, 2012, p.2). The mind is the human body’s mental state. It is private and only observable to other humans, by that human’s behaviour, actions and voiced output…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to dualists, a human being is both a physical body, and a non-physical mind. We can easily determine properties that are physical. Anything that takes up space can be considered a physical property. However, it is nearly impossible to determine exactly what non-physical properties are. Without knowing exactly what non-physical properties are, it is difficult to determine if both physical and non physical properties can work together. If we can not see the mind or soul in nature, can we be sure it exists? If the non-physical soul does exist, can it affect the physical body? Can a non-physical mind cause the physical body to move? For example, if I decide to go to a football game, and do so,…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sexuality and Gender

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages

    People thinking from the interactionist perspective consider the symbols and details of everyday life, what these symbols mean, and how people interact with each other.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the cogito, or mind, is invisible and takes up no space. This leaves researchers and philosophers unable to visually study anything at all. In certain terms, this weakness also ties to the strength: use of psychology to make advancements in the research of this theory. Without solid proof, the cogito is merely an idea being contemplated. However, dualism itself says that the simple idea of the cogito proves the existence of the cogito. It is quite possible that the mind-body problem is just the manipulation of words to form weak explanations to the possibility of some invisible entity directing the body to make conscious decisions. Because the cogito is a natural idea, instilled since birth, people believe in it regardless of the proof. This may also contribute to the difficulty of finding proof for its existence. Humans find it difficult to strip back the concepts they are already familiar with in order to more deeply study a concept. However, this may be exactly what is needed to solve the problem. The ultimate weakness in the dualistic mind-body problem may very well be the existence of the cogito in itself. How may something that is doing the studying, be studied? It is an endless cycle of confusion and questions that lead back to the same outcome: there is no physical evidence because physical evidence must be nonexistent. Otherwise, the presence of the cogito would immediately be disproven because it does not take up space, nor can it be seen. The evidence is in behavior, which works through the brain. One may assume the closest the human race will ever come to solving the issue of connection is through brain and mind processes that show correlation. We are aware of the fact that physical evidence cannot be found, therefore, we must be inclined to accept the idea that visual, experimental…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dualistic Interaction is where there are two basic kinds of stuff, material stuff and mental stuff. With these two different realms being both, distinct and separable. There is the mutually separate ability to distinguish between both of the two realms. Then there is also the two-way interaction in which the mind and body work together to achieve a specific task or goal. Dualistic Interaction believes in that the mind and body, and that it can work separately from each other, where as a physical determinist do work together to achieve their goal. Physical determinism being true or false agrees that the role of mental phenomena in causing physical phenomena is superfluous, meaning that the mental can make no difference to what happens in the…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Often during boring classes, that have no relation to communications, many students will find themselves daydreaming about a variety of scenarios that include the following: an upcoming date, job interview, presentation, or athletic situation. These imagined interactions often help these daydreaming students to perform better when the actual situation occurs. Imagined Interaction theory is an intrapersonal theory in which people imagine scenarios, how their actions in the scenario will affect the outcome, and which course of action will lead to the best outcome. This theory can be justified, explained, described, applied, revealed to be important, and used in a Christian context.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays