Preview

Are You a Utilitarian, a Kantian Deontology, or Virtuous Person? Why?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
920 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Are You a Utilitarian, a Kantian Deontology, or Virtuous Person? Why?
Being human is not always the same even the appearance and the way of thinking. Different people have different point of views. Some people are utilitarian, some are Kantian Deontologist, and some are Virtuous people. From my perspective, I am the kind of person who cannot decide which one best describes my thinking. Sometimes I could feel that I am a utilitarian, and sometime I can be all of them. Therefore, being utilitarian means that good or bad depends on the result of the action. On the one hand, being Kantian Deontologist means that good or bad is in the action, and a virtuous person means that good or bad is in the person. I can say that I am a utilitarian based on some references. I do care a lot for other people’s happiness, and I really appreciate to let the people who stay around me to be happy. For example, I had a complicated relationship with my boyfriend when I was in year 1 at my university. We really love each other, yet it was getting worse and worse after my mother knew about our relationship. She blamed me for having a boyfriend without telling her and letting her decide who can be my partner in the future. She seemed to be unhappy as well as my parents, so I decided to quit my relationship with the one whom I love the most. I decided to do that since I want my mother to be happy and my whole family. Even though there are two people in this problem who cannot get happiness still there are more than two people who can be happy. The decision of choosing family should be right. As I am a Cambodian child, I have the authority to listen to what my family say is good or bad. However, I have to follow what my families tell me to do; I still have the right to think what is good and what is bad. For this problem, I know that I am wrong since I have a boyfriend in the early age. On the other hand, I feel that I am a Kantian Deontologist. Living in the world we need to be honest and do well in society. Doing the right action is important;
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Is Areteology a Better Way of Approaching Ethics Than Deontology or Teleology?
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Is Areteology a Better Way of Approaching Ethics Than Deontology or Teleology?

    Deontology is the study of actions being formed by our duty. Kant’s theory is very much a deontological theory based around the theory of Duty. This specific theory incorporates what people are supposed to do and the correct actions to take in certain situations. These ethics teach people that some things…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Utilitarian Objection Raised By Srinivasan Analysis
    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Utilitarian Objection Raised By Srinivasan Analysis

    Another objection raised by Srinivasan will be by worrying about the world while your loved one is in need without the help of anyone will not make us happy. As the Utilitarian want everyone to think like them and care for others and their happiness. We are normal people who cannot be forced to anything that we don’t want. For instance, If the utilitarian suggest we donate to Donald Trump’s funds because that money goes to affected areas. And If I was an immigrant from the middle east or South Africa, I would not donate to Trump’s funds for many reasons. One, he only cares about the American people then why should my money goes to them when I can give it to charities back in my country in the middle east or Africa. Two, with the donation the funds can become so stronger that can create more racism and kick me out from the US. We have our own personal identity and loyalties. People will always be loyal to the people that are always there for…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper
    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth/316 Ethics Research Paper

    The utilitarian’s believe that the main thing that make an act morally right or wrong can be based on the consequences being beneficial. An ethics of virtue is based on the general idea or principle that a morally right act is the moral decision of what a virtuous person would do in any given situation. This is the key difference in utilitarianism and virtue ethics. The deontological theory says that people should stick to their obligations and duties when analyzing an ethical dilemma. They believe that a person should follow their own responsibilities to any other person as well as to society because doing what you are obligated to do is deemed morally right and ethically correct. Virtue ethics describes that the character is the moral force for the ethical behavior rather than rules of deontological and utilitarianisms. The difference between these three views is that the morality seems to depend more on the way the moral issues are approached than in the moral conclusion…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Utilitarian Ethical Theories
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparison Of Utilitarian Ethical Theories

    Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Health Canada's Argument Analysis
    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Health Canada's Argument Analysis

    I will first explicate on the theory of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophical theory which states that that which is right is what brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest maximum number of people. The act that manages to fulfill this criteria is the act that is then morally right. As a result, whenever we consider what is a morally right action to do, we have to keep in mind that the action that would make it so that the accumulated level of happiness in the majority would be higher than the accumulated number of unhappiness in a majority. As well, utilitarianism is bias-free, in that the happiness levels of your close friends and family do not take priority over the happiness levels of the neighbors next door, or of people in countries that you have never visited and will never…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week 1
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth 316 Week 1

    Virtue theory emphasizes character traits rather than the rules or consequences while deontology is described as an action that is right only if it is in accordance with a moral rule or principle. Utilitarianism puts more emphasis on the consequences and that decisions should be made based on happiness for the greatest number of people.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eth/316 Ethics And Social Responsibility Research Paper
    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth/316 Ethics And Social Responsibility Research Paper

    Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Eth 316 Week One Essay
    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eth 316 Week One Essay

    The utilitarianism theory of ethics focuses on weighing options for actions and the choice made depends on the course of action that has the best consequences for the individual. This approach gives little consideration to the morals as long as the outcome benefits one’s self, even at the expense of some individuals. Morality issues receive consideration if the action taken is a moral one. For example, a person may not personally believe in war, but a soldier will serve when called because he or she believes in serving his or her country (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2011).…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Moral Theories in Health Care
    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Moral Theories in Health Care

    The utilitarian mainly focuses on the value of the well being, which is analyzed in the terms of the pleasures, happiness welfare, preference satisfaction whereas the Kantianism believes that the morality is grounded in reason, duty rather than the sympathy, emotions. This indicates that the person have to act not only in an accordance with but for the sake of the obligation.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay
    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    First, utilitarianism allows for the good of all. Mills wrote, "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." Because morality is based on the greatest pleasure the more people who benefit from an act, the more…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism Classical Utilitarianism
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Utilitarianism Classical Utilitarianism

    Classical Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy, which was developed in 19th century England by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in, is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action, in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation, well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stem Cell Research and Deontology
    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stem Cell Research and Deontology

    The deontological theory contends that right and wrong are determined by the consequences of an action. Deontologists do not negate that consequences are significant but they believe there are more relevant aspects to the moral duty of the action. Deontology mainly focuses on Immanuel Kant and W.D. Ross. Kant based his view on moral principles that define between right and wrong. He also views deontology as an act on any maxim if and only if you can will it into a universal law. Kant introduces that there are rules to determine situations and he also shares that we should never treat people as means to ends. In this way, rational beings should always treat each other as ends in themselves, never as only means. Kant believed that humans have intrinsic worth and we should act to respect the mortality for us and others. He also believed that when humans recognize their worth, they cannot see themselves being used as entities to an end. Kant also shows the importance of not actually doing the right thing, but doing things for the sense of duty for getting moral worth in return. W.D. Ross developed the prima facia obligations. These obligations are obligations that override other obligations. According to Ross, there are seven types of obligations: 1. Duties of fidelity, 2. Duties of reparation, 3. Duties of gratitude, 4. Duties of justice, 5. Duties of beneficence, 6. Duties of…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Paper
    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethics Paper

    Utilitarian usually answers the question “What one ought to do in a situation.” A utilitarian may answer this question with the statement that individual should do whatever is the greater good for everyone involved. Utilitarian often involves accessing the consequences of one’s actions and what will resolve in the best interest of all involved.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The True Nature of Man
    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The True Nature of Man

    As with any controversy, it is crucial to address the opinions of the opposing side in order to probe their potentially correct reasoning. Those who have the ability to generalize and place all of humanity under one category believe that all men are born either innately virtuous or corrupt. Proponents of whole human decency use the argument that one simply cannot be birthed as a “bad” person, and that each and every individual is intended to do good in this world. For instance, philosopher John Locke contended that all people are written off as just and moral. In a metaphorically unparalleled universe, there lived a man named Thomas Hobbes who couldn’t disagree more. His spoiled views of man compelled him to believe that humans simply acted by their exact fraudulent nature if left to fend for themselves. Both these men, however, attempted to view our grayish world with black and white lines. At opposite poles, these two perspectives fail to identify the exactitude of humans’ true nature—which is nothing more than they are human.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism And Kant's Moral Theory
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utilitarianism And Kant's Moral Theory

    Both utilitarianism and moral theory share the idea what ought to be done. Their differences is how they are perceived. Utilitarianism is perceived moral from the consequences of the action, or the outcome. Kant’s moral theory is perceived moral from the motive behind the action, or the why. As shown, both theories share likes and…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics