Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

AP DBQ han vs rome

Good Essays
617 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
AP DBQ han vs rome
Comparing and Contrasting the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty

Throughout history, many powerful empires and dynasties have ruled. Some ruled for hundreds of years, while others lasted for shorter time periods. All of these ruling powers had a great impact on their country’s development. The way they governed their people and kept in power were often very different but they often achieved the same goals. The Han Dynasty, which ruled China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 C.E and the Roman Empire, which was in power from 31B.C.E. to 476 C.E., are two examples of this. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had many similarities such as public works and a strong government system, but they also had many differences like their forms of government and how slavery existed in their society.

There are many similarities between the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty. For example, both invested greatly in public work projects such as roadways and water treatments systems. The Romans were know for their major public works projects such as aqueduct systems, roads and bridges. The structure they used for their bridges is still to this day referred to as a “Roman Arch” design. The Han Dynasty also invested greatly in public work projects. Under the Han Dynasty, the Great Wall of China was finished. The Great Wall of China is still standing today. The Romans developed a complex aqueduct system and the Han Dynasty developed a complex system of canals. This emphasis on roads and other transportation systems help to unify the vast empires and reduce travel time within them. The strong government systems used by both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty help develop the regions into world powers. Both had strong armies that helped to defend their borders and grow their respective empires. Both controlled similar amounts of land. In the second century C.E., China controlled about 1.5 million square miles of territory and Rome controlled about 1.7 million square miles of territory. The cost of the strong military however, eventually helped lead to the downfall of each empire/dynasty. Both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a strong agricultural base. This base allowed them to trade with other areas, giving them a strong economical advantage and also allowed their population to grow.

While the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had many similarities, they also had many differences. For example Rome was established as a bureaucracy. The Han Dynasty always had an Emperor. Rome often allowed local areas to run themselves with little direction from Rome. The Han Dynasty did not tolerate local authority that did not follow everything that the Emperor said. As a result, Rome tolerated many different languages and cultures under its rule. This lead to a population that had many different beliefs and customs. The Han Dynasty did not tolerate these types of differences and made its population conform to the many of the same beliefs. The Han Dynasty was more unified and highly centralized than the Roman Empire. Rome also greatly relied on slavery to make their Empire run. Rome used slaves for road building, farming and many other activities that allowed Rome to stay in power. China also had slavery but depended on its peasant class for much of the work need for it’s agriculture society.

Though these famous eras changed society in many ways, both of these ruling powers fell. The Fall of the Roman Empire lead Europe into the Dark Ages and dynastys that followed the Han Dynasty never reached the power that the Han Dynasty once held. Though the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had many similarities and differences, both changed the world.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were similar technologically. Both had extensive trade and travel networks as well as water technology. The Romans were able to expand and control their empire because of a large network of well maintained roads; originally designed for a quicker deployment of troops the road network also promoted trade because of the relative safety of travel. Similar to the Romans the Han also had an extensive travel network; however, theirs was one based on the water. The Han used rivers as transport which led to the development of a canal network because, as with the Romans, of the safety of travel. Both of these empires also used water technology to move water without manpower. In Rome aqueducts were used to take advantage of gravity and transport water from far away to farms and cities. In the Han waterwheels took advantage of flowing water to create energy which powered chain pumps that moved water to irrigation ditches.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major similarity between the administration policies of Han China and Imperial Rome was that both empires had very centralized governments. In China, the emperor had all the power. While there were smaller units of government, the emperor controlled everything within the empire. Han China’s government structure was modeled after its precursor, the Qin dynasty. The Han elaborated on the original structure, perfecting it. In Rome, the emperor was also the most powerful; however the Roman people had an illusion of power not seen in Han China. Although the emperor held the…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From 206 B.C.E. - 220 C.E., the Han dynasty, in China, accumulated many political control methods, as did Imperial Rome reigning from 31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E. However, there were more differences than similarities between the two empires/dynasties. Two main differences were China and Rome’s territorial expansion and their political philosophies (mandate of heaven and monarchy). A similarity between these two empires would be their centralized government adopting bureaucracy.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the empires lasted during the same time, they were located on completely different land areas. Rome had the Mediterranean, was hilly, with lots of rivers. Natural protections with their central location, and able to utilize their manpower resources of Italy. While Han China had rivers, plateau, deserts, mountains, was plain-fertile but needed…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China and Rome were two of the most powerful and popular empires of their time, but they fell like any other empire before them. Han China and Rome’s Empires had the same causes for their declines, but their effects are different.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Around 200 B.C.E. to 200 C.E. the empires of Rome and Han China flourished in the 1.5 million square miles. Each of their societies developed in vastly different lands. Separated from each other, Rome and China’s empires grew individually. Although separated by thousands of miles and differences of language, each society developed their own individual yet similar aspects. The societies of Ancient Rome and Han China were similar because of their patriarchal values which shaped their families and the status of their wealthy classes. Rome and China were different in their societies because of their individual uses of slavery and language.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Han Chinese were more diplomatic and wanted to avoid conflict as much as possible. There mindset was to win battles without fighting. Instead of using military and legions to defend their borders. They used walls and diplomacy to get other enemies away from attacking their borders. The romans though were a very attack mentality kind of military. They were very organized and had a lot of legions. They would use the citizens to sign up for the military. This was also a way to keep political control by making them sign up for the military. They used the legions and the military to defend their borders. A similarity though is that they both used roads and waterways for military access and trade routes. They could move the military easier from place to place. They could collect taxes and control trade. And also they could govern more effectively with use of messengers due to the…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One major and most common similarity the Han and Roman empires share is they were both very successful and dominant compared to other societies of their time. One reason these two empires were so dominant is because of their advancement in architecture. During the Han Dynasty much of the Great Wall of China was built. Although the Han Dynasty was much more advanced in architecture than other societies they could not compare to Roman architecture, no one really could. The Romans are known for many things but one of the most commonly talked about subjects when it comes to Rome is architecture. The Romans are given credit for creating cement, which leads to all their other architecture achievements, like the Arch of Titus, The Arch of Constantine, and one of the most famous Roman Buildings the Roman Colosseum. The Roman and Han dynasty were also similar in the matter of what their weapons were made of. The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both used bronze and iron for things like swords, and shields. These two powerful empires share another thing in common, roads and trades routes. Some of these trade routes were by sea, the Mediterranean and Black Seas were a huge part of Roman trading. The most useful trade route during this time was the Silk Road. Various items were traded on the Silk Road such as silk, weapons, tea, wine, horses, jewelry, and other valuables. Architecture, the use of bronze and iron, and their many…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The massively extensive classical empires of Imperial Rome (31BCE-476CE) and Han China (206BCE-220CE) were extremely influential when it came to the world around them. In essence, the two empires were virtually the same in terms of political structure and military protocols, yet greatly different in the area of religious tolerance.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a lot in common, but they also have many differences. For instance, the Roman Empire relied heavily on slave (mostly prisoners of war) labor, but the Han Dynasty relied greatly on free peasant labor. Although both the Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty had a well organized bureaucracy, the Han Dynasty had bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideology. Also the Han Dynasty did not have paved roads, where as the Roman Empire constructed many paved roads (which was because the romans discovered concrete).…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, ancient Rome and Han China both shared political views. The political structures of both were based on very well organized bureaucratic systems with strong monarchy sets of succession. These were two of the most dominant empires of Ancient Europe and Asia. They arose from small states,but with lots of discipline and military toughness, took power over small and quarreling neighbors. However Rome's military was much more powerful in all criteria.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Han Empire had a very positive outlook on the advancement of technology such as irrigation systems while the Roman Empire seemed to have a lot of opposition regarding the advancement of technology. The Roman elites viewed technology as tools for the weak. Both Empires acknowledged the change in technology in some way or another.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays