Preview

Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
799 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau's Social Contract
In the Social Contract, Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s key viewpoint is that all men are born free, but end up being in chains everywhere in the course of their lives (Rousseau and Cole 2 ). Rousseau argues that modern political states repress the basic freedoms which men possess as their birthright. These political states then lead men into the civil society in which the civil freedoms of men are not secure. Most importantly, Rousseau points out that the legitimacy of political authority can only be a product of social that all citizens agree upon motivated by the need for mutual preservation. Throughout the book, Rousseau makes key distinctions that make the basis of the discussions in this essay.
a. Social contract refers to the view that the
…show more content…
Rousseau explains the philosophical underpinnings of the social contract as well as its suitable form. The suitable form is the ‘sovereign’ which according to Rousseau is the collective description the people who mutually agree to enter into a civil society. The individuals may have different needs and opinions, but the sovereign, as a product of the social contract, expresses the common will and good for the entire …show more content…
According to Rousseau, the civil society is what represses people’s freedom who argues that people’s freedoms are better secured in the state of nature. This point of view sharply contrasts with that of Hobbes who sees the state of nature as one of constant battles. Hobbes sees a civil society as the most ideal way of ensuring that collective freedoms are preserved.
According to Rousseau people have more freedoms and live peacefully in the state of natural law. However, other philosophers such as Hobbes and Locke disagree with this view and see the civil society as more ideal. Rousseau is highly a libertarian because the advocates for a high degree of freedom and individual judgment which he sees as being present in the state of natural law.
c. Rousseau made a distinction of natural liberty, civil liberty, and moral liberty. This is basically his classification of various categories of freedom. Natural liberty is the most basic and thrives in the state of nature, in natural liberty, man has unlimited freedom and right to anything he/she desires and is capable of attaining. Civil liberty is gained upon entry into a civil society through a social contract. Men give up the natural liberty which is less secure in exchange for civil liberty which is secured collectively. Rousseau, however, believes that the loss of natural liberty is a fundamental loss

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ideas would be key to transforming loyal English colonists, first into revolutionaries and then into founders of a new nation.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    00-Sep-2016 Asma Ahmed Bham Shaping Modernity - Essay Assignment “In what way does Burke’s speeches before Parliament reflect some of the ideas articulated by Rousseau in The Social Contract?” The social contract is about people exchanging their political freedom for protection from their ruling body. Going back to initial idea of the social contract by Thomas Hobbs, who talks about the relationship between the ruler and those they rule, says that there is an exchange between these two parties- freedoms for protection.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Locke and Rousseau both believed in a form of direct democracy, including freedom, equality, and independence. One of Locke’s important philosophies was that people are born with a blank slate, the “Tabula Rasa”, so everyone deserves political respect from birth, but with bad actions such privileges can go away. Rousseau pushed for a social contract to govern society, which took away rights but promised safety. Also, they both valued the human mind much more than past rulers, hence why they set up many ways for citizens to express their own ideas in their government. By including their philosophies in the Enlightenment age it helped push more countries in Europe to become a direct…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau developed a definition for the state of nature by using his knowledge of humans and animals, which he gathered from observations and experiences. He did not base his ideas of the state of nature on religious beliefs. Rather, he worked backwards; he used what he knew about contemporary man to guess how man was in the beginning (i.e. in the state of nature). Locke begins to explore the state of nature on the premise that the savage man had natural rights in the state of nature. Both philosophers followed the same train of thought: the state of nature, the development of property, the need for the social contract, the civil society that was created, and the governments that formed in those societies. They differ in that Rousseau believed that people left the state of nature when they discovered the benefits of relying on each other for resources. The idea of property caused labor to become necessary; this created a need for a social contract, which formed civil society. Since civil society formed on communal values, it should come before the individual. The individual does not sustain the social contract, the group of individuals does. In…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SGPP300A Exam 1 Notes

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Monarchy: single person is sovereign, vested with complete authority -- executive, legislative, and judicial powers…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Rousseau, the General Will presents itself as a way to recover a natural freedom that men lost throughout History. By giving up remaining liberties for civil liberties granted by the general will, society becomes coordinated and unified : “What generalizes the will is less the number of voices than the common interest that unites them” (Book I-2). For Rousseau's view of a will guiding the people to occur, individual will must be subordinated and filtered through the general will. In such a perfect society, harmony reigns as individuals accept that their liberty and equality grounds on their subordination to the will of all. In this optic, one cannot disagree with the collective will because by its definition it is always fair and based…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rousseau Analysis

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In ancient times all men lived in a state of nature until hardships and the necessity to form a civil society between one another became eminent. Jean Jacques Rousseau’s “The Social Contract,” analyses the steps and reasoning behind this transition. In Rousseau’s work he focuses on several key terms in order to define this transition clearly, they include: state of nature, social contract, civil society, general will, and the sovereign.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When one thinks about the major historical documents that have shaped a country or a religion throughout history such as The United States Constitution or The Ten Commandments, an impersonal image of (In this case) words on paper or words on a stone tablet pops into mind. The reader rarely takes the time to analyze the rigorous process behind the creation of the laws and rules that encompass their everyday lives, be it in the United States or in any other country in the world. The creation and execution of laws are two individual processes that ultimately come together as they are being indoctrinated into a singular society, country or state. In Rousseau’s The Social Contract, he contrasts both aspects of law-making and law-executing, more…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His most important idea of his civil society is that ''as owners they are trustees for the common wealth. Their rights are respected/by their fellow citizens and are maintained by the united strength of the community [.. .]" (71). In this quote Rousseau is stating that private property allows the owners to be…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau, J.J. The Social Contract and the First and Second Discourses, ed. Susan Dunn (Yale University Press (Yale University Press, 2002)…

    • 2528 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Next point in the Social Contract is the part where Rousseau talks about dependence and how human people are dependent animals who depend on nature and on other humans for their needs. Dependence on nature is not a problem since nature provides air to breathe, water to drink, the wherewithal for food and shelter without that we don’t survive. Dependence on other humans is different because it threatens our freedom because we are in control of somebody else…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Social Contract made some revolutionary points, that continue to be applicable to the world today. It impacted the American Government system by creating the idea of an agreement by society to abide by the rules of authority without force, and in return be rewarded with protection. To conclude, Rousseau’s ideas are wise and beneficial to the community because they create order without violent…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without a belief that political efficacy is strong, and each citizen making a personal input into society, it is the belief of both Rousseau and myself that “the State is not far from its fall.” Faith and activity in the political system has been replaced with financial activity. Rousseau states that, “In a country that is truly free, the citizens do everything with their own arms and nothing by means of money; so far from paying to be exempted from their duties, they would even pay for the privilege of fulfilling them themselves.” If people so desire to make their input to society purely financial, perhaps they should be punished financially for not being politically active.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rousseau Contract Theory

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s The Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right (1762) is an analysis of the contractual relationships which may be necessary for legitimate government, and is an explanation of how these relationships may combine principles of justice and utility. Rousseau argues that civil society is based on a contractual arrangement of rights and duties which applies equally to all people, whereby natural liberty is exchanged for civil liberty, and whereby natural rights are exchanged for legal rights. The terms of the contract provide assurance that civil laws promote the public good rather than the private good of particular individuals or groups. If the contract is breached by a government which usurps the sovereignty of its people, then the people are no longer obligated to submit to that government and consequently regain their natural liberty.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Like Hobbes and Locke, Rousseau believed in the social contract theory. This theory states that there exists an arrangement among the governed to submit to a common authority. As a result, the governed surrender them to a sovereign authority. This theory is an attempt to answer the question, “What justifies the existence of the state?” Hobbes, Rousseau, and Locke were avid proponents of the social contract because they felt that the existence of the state was necessary for the flourishing of mankind. Locke is famously known for his emphasis on individual liberty and personal autonomy.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays