Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

An Analysis of Freedom of Expression on the Campus

Good Essays
525 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Analysis of Freedom of Expression on the Campus
“Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” In Derek Bok’s article, “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus”, Bok writes about what has been a long-lasting controversial issue in the United States: freedom of speech and expression. The author claims that though the acts are “insensitive and unwise,” they are permitted, and lawfully so. Acts of expression are committed on a day-to-day basis and in a broad aspect of environments; some are offensive while others are not. Who decides what is offensive and what is appropriate? This is one of the dilemmas that the Supreme Court has had to consider, since what might offend one person might in turn be acceptable to another.
The act of hanging a confederate flag at Harvard was one such controversy. Bok does not support the act, but rather supports the fact that it is a legal act. He gives credit to both sides of the argument. He claims that freedom of expression is important and every citizen of United States has that right. However he adds, “It is important to distinguish between the appropriateness of such communications and their status under the First Amendment” (66).
Bok believes that it is a hard decision to decide what should and should not be censored. He states that “one reason why the power of censorship is so dangerous is that it is extremely difficult to decide when a particular communication is offensive enough to warrant exclusion or to weigh the degree of offensiveness against the potential value of the communication” (67). Working through positive channels, like having forums and welcoming open dialog amongst divergent groups may have a longer lasting effect. While disagreements may persist, Bok hopes that opposing groups could have at least a basic respect for the other.
If people are going to express themselves then they should be aware of the possible effects it is going to have on the people around them. Free speech may be protected by the First Amendment but it does not make it right to be disrespectful to others. This country is a combination of diverse cultures, ethnicities, and traditions and limiting a right that is granted to us by the constitution would go against what this country was built on: freedom.
I feel that Bok has a great argument, but the fact of the matter is not all will agree. Like Bok said why should Harvard have less free speech than a public University (67). Bok feels that the way to get offensive gestures to stop is to ignore them completely so that you do not feed the fuel of those who put these displays out in public. Instead of prohibiting certain types of speech, education and communication might work better in bringing about awareness about those things that are deemed offensive to some. Trying to find a common ground in which to talk safely and openly about insensitive speech, may help different communities come together and learn to accept and understand one another.

Work Cited
Bok Derek, “Freedom of Expression on Campus”, Critical Thinking Reading and Writing 7th, A Brief Guide to Argument, edition, Barnet, Bendau

Cited: Bok Derek, “Freedom of Expression on Campus”, Critical Thinking Reading and Writing 7th, A Brief Guide to Argument, edition, Barnet, Bendau

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tinker vs. Des Moine

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1969, Des Moines Iowa school districts, it was fine to wear the iron cross to support Nazis but it was not okay to wear arm bands to support stopping the Vietnam War. (“Tinker V. Des Moines” 3) When students wore the arm bands they were asked to go home and suspended from school. This set up the case for Tinker v. Des Moines independent school district, a case that would determine the right of free speech for students. This case can be better understood by studying the Des Moines independent schools, students and their policies, examining the decision of the court and, reflecting on how it has influenced society today.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Des Moines court case was written by Justice Abe Fortas. Its contents contribute to the ideas of those who believe certain kinds of speech should not be prohibited within an educational setting. In this majority opinion statement, Justice Abe Fortas reveals that there is an “absence of a specific showing of constitutionally valid reasons to regulate [students’] speech” (Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District by Justice Abe Fortas par. 9). Because of this absence of reason, students should be allowed to express their opinions and views on topics of their choice. Justice Abe Fortas justifies his statement by referencing another court case that says “school officials cannot suppress ‘expressions of feelings with which they do not wish to contend’ Burnside v. Byars, supra, at 749” (par. 9).…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But according to court rulings, “public expression is speech and I cannot think of a single Supreme Court case that has ever deemed public expression to be harassment” (Erwin). Many Supreme Court rulings never explore speech for its harassment, but more of how it should protect the people’s constitutional rights of the first amendment. In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, students wore armbands as a way of expressing their opinion on the Vietnam war. Those who didn’t remove the armbands would ultimately be set in suspension from the school. The court ruled that “in our system, undifferentiated fear or apprehension of disturbance is not enough to overcome the right to freedom of expression” (Saunders).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article talked about how the students of UC Berkeley were protesting against a speech being given at their school, and how the sponsors of this group were forced to pay $15,000 in security fees. Then on top of that fee the school paid an additional $600,000 to create cemented barriers and have armed forces on campus during the meeting. Personally I feel these precautions were unnecessary however due to the way students were reacting it had to be done. Another subject brought up in the article was the fact that 44 percent of students said that the First Amendment does not protect "hate speech", 51 percent said that they would be in favor of students speaking out against a speaker "known for making offensive and hurtful statements" and 19 percent of students said the use of violence against controversial speakers is acceptable. This information frustrates me because freedom of speech is black and white, personal opinions shouldn’t interfere with our rights.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He goes on to discuss the fact that the display of these flags triggered a lot of controversy on the university campus, over the freedom of speech. He recalled that some of the students expressed that school administration should not allow the symbols because they are offensive to others. He asserts that some of the students felt the flag was the representation of oppressive and deeply unpleasant time in American history. He also mentions the students who felt that the symbols represented free speech and should be allowed.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states that only if a person’s speech has substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others it may be censored. Most people take that how it is supposed to be taken. If you actually read the law, it is easy to see that many things…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Roger Rosenblatt endured in countries of constrained inhabitants, “the secret publication of books, the pirated music, the tricky subversive lines of poetry read at vast gatherings of tens of thousands. And the below the surface comedy” (503) will continuously arise no matter the discouragement present. In a country founded on its freedoms, the retraction of any of those privileges will be met with extreme adversity. Moreover, “since free is the way people's minds were made to be” (Rosenblatt 502) the restriction of verbal expression will only cause riots and outrage. Currently, various universities and colleges have faced the backlash of unjust speech limitations on their campuses. One student attending a college in Arizona prepares to sue the school for, “her school’s so-called “speech zone,” arguing the policy “severely limited” her right to free speech and due process” (Harkness). Reactions to a decrease in the liberty to speak freely induces immediate retaliation and hardship, in addition, to being entirely unnecessary. To keep the peace and stability, the United States must keep the freedom of speech as it was intended to be used, freely.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Citizens United Case

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Wu, T. (2010). The Future of Free Speech. Chronicle of Higher Education, 57 (13), B4-B5.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In higher education, public universities/colleges in the United States of America must respect students’ civil rights. These rights are stated under the United States Constitution, one entitlement is the First Amendment. The First Amendment protects the freedom of speech. Every student in an institution has the right to the freedom of speech. One free speech topic is the freedom in student press/ publication. Freedom in student press/publication is a speech is protected under the First Amendment. The student has the right to his or her own opinion. When these rights are violated, the student can file suit against the college and/or university.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As American citizens, according to the 1st Amendment in the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States, we have the right to freedom of speech. However, in certain vicinities, such as public schools, that freedom is limited. Teachers for example, cannot discuss their own political or religious views with students. In addition, neither the teacher nor the student is allowed to profane. These types of restrictions are justified by saying there is a certain time and place for those subjects and school is not the proper place. School is for fundamental education and obtaining a broad view of the world without students being compelled into believing or acting based on the views of the teachers.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the debate over censorship of hate speech on college campuses, the opponents conclude that colleges should censor hate speech on campus because minorities have the civil right to equal enjoyment of education, free of harassment. On the other side of the debate, the supporters conclude that we should not censor hate speech on campus because students have a right to academic freedom. In this essay I will conclude that colleges should not censor hate speech.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom of speech is a beautiful idea. As a matter of fact, the first amendment itself is perhaps the greatest amendment in the Bill of Rights. As something that we take for granted most of the time, we never truly realize how much of a blessing it is to speak your mind and have decent conversations with each other. However, if you want it to rain, you have to deal with the mud and there are many examples of people spitting out stupid ideas or thoughts that should be kept to themselves.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Naturally, many negative connotations come along with the term “free-speech zone.” The wording alone automatically insinuates that free speech should not be allowed everywhere, which is hardly the true intention of the idea. Sometimes the right of free speech is taken advantage of; such as in certain rallies and protests, where disruptive noise, violence, and destruction often occurs. Universities hold a responsibility to their students of providing a reasonably safe and undisruptive environment to learn and excel in. Universities are not creating “free-speech zones” to limit free speech, but rather to maintain a secure atmosphere that is conducive to concentration and higher learning.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ways in which we express ourselves will not always sync with the opinions, views and beliefs of others. Diversity is part of what makes us, as a people unique and special. Expression, in whatever form, is how we let the world know how we feel, share our opinions and air our views. The fact that it may be offensive to a few should not mean that the enjoyment of the right to freedom of expression should hindered in such a way that the opinions, views and belief of the people should smothered and…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays