Preview

Abraham Lincoln: Abolitionist?

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
903 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abraham Lincoln: Abolitionist?
Abraham Lincoln is considered a hero for freeing slaves with his Emancipation

Proclamation, yet if you were to take a long, hard look at Honest Abe, you would find that his

reputation is quite skewed in relation to his true character. Considered the ultimate Abolitionist

and a defender of enslaved blacks, Lincoln didn’t hold truly strong anti-slavery beliefs, and can

actually be considered a racist and bigot by today’s standards. To judge Lincoln by today’s

standards may be a bit unfair though, due to the society he was a part of and the time period he

lived in, and the feats he accomplished during his presidency were nothing short of revolutionary

Abraham Lincoln is viewed today, by many, as a defender of blacks and an abolitionist.

This notion is actually false. Although Lincoln believed slavery was morally wrong, “Those who

deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves; and, under a just God, can not long retain

it” (Basler 376), he wasn’t actually anti-slavery, and believed that he was to do whatever was

best for the unification of the Union. “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union,

and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave

I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would so it... what I about slavery...

I do because I believe that it helps to save the Union.” (Basler 388) Lincoln was also a racist and

felt that blacks did not deserve equal rights as whites. He believed, as did many whites at this

time, that his rave was the superior. “I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the rave ti

wgucg u belong having the superior position. I have never said anything to the contrary.”

(www.lewrockwell.com/orig/young8.html) Lincoln even went as far as stating that all blacks

should move from America and that the nation should be ethnically cleansed. “Send them to

Liberia, to their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    1982 DBQ

    • 479 Words
    • 1 Page

    with one goal in mind, get the slaves free through having them join in rebellion. There mission…

    • 479 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    -re- establish racial hierarchy by limiting slaves to low-paying jobs and taking away voting rights…

    • 4578 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ch.14 Apush Outline

    • 3408 Words
    • 14 Pages

    * It would have guaranteed the permanent existence of slavery in the slave states and satisfy Southern demands on issues such as fugitive slaves and slavery in DC.…

    • 3408 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I now view Lincoln’s presidency similar to the way John Adams viewed the Gag Rule, which forbade slavery topics. It was based solely on the right to freedom of speech (First Amendment). As mentioned in class today, just because Adams repealed the Gag Rule did not mean that he was not racist. As for Lincoln, just because he participated in the freeing of slaves, does not mean that he wasn’t a racist. It could be possible that he wanted an all-white nation, but his plan to make the country all white just backfired and ended up with a country full of free blacks and upset white…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    And believed whites and blacks should live separately however, that is no reason to kill. All he wanted was for his people to have the same rights that whites did.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tom Stoowe Research Paper

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From Lincoln’s himself perspective to say he doesn’t allow they keep slaves. But to the whole country, the congress will allow they keep slave system. The lucky thing is Lincoln win the war and destroy the slave system.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass were heroic because they both dedicated their lives to helping people get their freedom and liberty. Lincoln believed that every person should be able to have liberty, but not every man had it. After Lincoln’s death, people truly realized how much Lincoln really wanted liberty for the slaves. At his funeral, Dr. Phineas Gurley said, “...though the friends of Liberty die, Liberty itself is immortal.” (SB p.68).Lincoln worked for liberty for the slaves even after hr died with the help of supporters. Even today we admire Lincoln because he wanted to make every man equal. Although Lincoln and Douglass were very different, they both wanted to make the slaves lives better. Douglass was a former slave that…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Spirit work ch 16

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages

    No because Lincoln states that he has no prejudice against the Southern people. He also states that doubtless there are individuals in the North and South who would not hold slaves under any circumstances, and others who would gladly introduce slavery anew, if it were out of existence. Since the South supported slavery, some southerners may have opposed some of his opposition since he sides with giving slaves their freedom at one point.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Favorite President

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page

    his country he also wanted to abolish slavery at the same time. Lincoln believed that to save…

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln is known as "The Great Emancipator" who freed the slaves. Yet in the early part of his career and even in the early stages of his presidency, Lincoln had no objection to slavery where it already existed, namely, in the Southern states. As a savvy politician, he always wanted to maintain the union, and he would use any device to keep the country together. However, his views on slavery evolved during his presidency, and the personal opposition towards slavery that he claimed he always had began to show through in his policy. As Lincoln noted in 1864, "I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel" (Lorence 306). Despite such strongly worded beliefs, Lincoln policies towards slavery often shifted for the sake of political expedience. For example, he pledged that states would be compensated for their loss of property as a result of emancipation to keep the border states from seceding. Still, by 1862 Lincoln had become firm in his convictions that slavery must be abolished. He even pressed for a constitutional amendment to ensure freedom to all the slaves. Lincoln espoused strong anti-slavery views, but he often put what he viewed as the good of the country ahead of the cause. Despite many detours along the way, he proved himself to be "The Great Emancipator." As a self-made politician from humble origins, Lincoln struggled in his early political life to define his identity. He described his childhood as "The short and simple annals of the poor. That's my life, and that's all you or any one else can make of it" (Oates 4). Lincoln felt extremely embarrassed about his background and worked his entire life to overcome the limitations he faced. He made himself a "literate and professional man who commanded the respect of his colleagues" (Oates 4). It is difficult to assess Lincoln's early views on slavery and race because they were constantly changing in an effort to achieve such…

    • 2258 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    GREAT EMANCIPATOR?

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although many people even today still consider President Lincoln the great emancipator, many scholars feel as if Radical Republicans were the main reason for the decisions Lincoln made about slavery during his presidency. In fact, two of the most important acts of Lincoln’s presidency were pushed through Congress by Radical Republicans. A scholar named Henry A Rhodes from the University of XXX feels that Lincoln was definitely rather reluctant to side with the Radicals rather than pushing with them. He says “Lincoln was somewhat of a moderate in comparison to the Radicals. He sided with them when it suited his purposes in his strategy for emancipation for the American Negro.” Rhodes says “This is evident from his endorsements of the two Confiscation Acts and the bill which prohibited slavery in the District of Columbia that were pushed through Congress by the Radical Republicans” (Rhodes, XX.) He feels the Confiscation Acts were substantial to the war and that Lincoln receives the credit when really the Radical Republicans should get it. He says “This act gave Lincoln the authority to use Negroes as soldiers in the fighting of the Civil War. As noted earlier, Lincoln was only in favor of using blacks as soldiers to help replace the shortage of Union soldiers and because he felt that this policy would shorten the War”(Rhodes, XX.) Rhodes feels that Lincoln is receiving credit that really should be received by the Radical Republicans.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emancipation Proclomation

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He said it was an act of war. Since it freed slaves, it allowed them to serve as…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    History records Abraham Lincoln as the Great Emancipator, yet ardent abolitionists of his day such as William Lloyd Garrison viewed him with deep suspicion. That the 16th president eventually achieved the abolitionists' most cherished dream, says biographer Allen Guelzo, happened through a curious combination of political maneuvering, personal conviction, and commitment to constitutional principle.…

    • 5760 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    His actions were taken too little too late, and his words were racist and degrading. As said before, leadership is defined by action, and the lack there of is the reason his title of “Man Who Freed The Slaves” should be revoked. Lincoln undoubtedly held the country together during hard times, but great leadership of a country doesn’t make you the leader of a movement founded by brave and powerful people working to do all they can in the hopes of freeing their brothers and sisters of black skin from slavery. Lincoln, because of all of these reasons, was not an abolitionist…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    liberty and equal opportunity. And he did so in an era of evolutionism, slavery was still…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays