Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Abolition of the White Australia Policy

Better Essays
1175 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abolition of the White Australia Policy
The 'White Australia' policy describes Australia's approach to immigration from federation until the latter part of the 20th century, which favoured applicants from certain countries.
The abolition of the policy took place over a period of 25 years.
Following the election of a coalition of the Liberal and Country parties in 1949, Immigration Minister Harold Holt allowed 800 non-European refugees to remain in Australia and Japanese war brides to enter Australia.
Over subsequent years Australian governments gradually dismantled the policy with the final vestiges being removed in 1973 by the new Labor government.
The history
The origins of the 'White Australia' policy can be traced to the 1850s. White miners' resentment towards industrious Chinese diggers culminated in violence on the Buckland River in Victoria, and at Lambing Flat (now Young) in New South Wales. The governments of these two colonies introduced restrictions on Chinese immigration.
Later, it was the turn of hard-working indentured labourers from the South Sea Islands of the Pacific (known as 'Kanakas') in northern Queensland. Factory workers in the south became vehemently opposed to all forms of immigration which might threaten their jobs; particularly by non-white people who they thought would accept a lower standard of living and work for lower wages.
Some influential Queenslanders felt that the colony would be excluded from the forthcoming Federation if the 'Kanaka' trade did not cease. Leading NSW and Victorian politicians warned there would be no place for 'Asiatics' or 'coloureds' in the Australia of the future.
In 1901, the new federal government passed an Act ending the employment of Pacific Islanders. The Immigration Restriction Act 1901 received royal assent on 23 December 1901. It was described as an Act 'to place certain restrictions on immigration and to provide for the removal from the Commonwealth of prohibited immigrants'.
The Act prohibited from immigration those considered to be insane, anyone likely to become a charge upon the public or upon any public or charitable institution. It also included any person suffering from an infectious or contagious disease 'of a loathsome or dangerous character'.
The Act also prohibited prostitutes, criminals and anyone under a contract or agreement to perform manual labour within Australia (with some limited exceptions).
Other restrictions included a dictation test which was used to exclude certain applicants by requiring them to pass a written test. Often tests were conducted in a language the applicant was not familiar with and had been nominated by an immigration officer.
With these severe measures the implementation of the 'White Australia' policy was warmly applauded in most sections of the community.
In 1919 the Prime Minister, William Morris Hughes, hailed it as 'the greatest thing we have achieved'.
Second World War
After the outbreak of hostilities with Japan, Prime Minister John Curtin reinforced the philosophy of the 'White Australia' policy, saying 'This country shall remain forever the home of the descendants of those people who came here in peace in order to establish in the South Seas an outpost of the British race'.
During World War II, many non-white refugees entered Australia. Most left voluntarily at the end of the war, but many had married Australians and wanted to stay. Arthur Calwell, the first immigration minister, sought to deport them, arousing much protest.
Minister Holt's decision in 1949 to allow 800 non-European refugees to stay, and Japanese war brides to be admitted, was the first step towards a non-discriminatory immigration policy.
The next major step
The next major step was in 1957 when non-Europeans with 15 years residence in Australia were allowed to become Australian citizens.
The revised Migration Act 1958 introduced a simpler system of entry permits and abolished the controversial dictation test.
The revised Act avoided references to questions of race. Indeed, it was in this context that the Minister for Immigration, Sir Alexander Downer, stated that 'distinguished and highly qualified Asians' might immigrate.
After a review of the non-European policy in March 1966, Immigration Minister Hubert Opperman announced applications for migration would be accepted from well-qualified people on the basis of their suitability as settlers, their ability to integrate readily and their possession of qualifications positively useful to Australia.
At the same time, the government decided a number of 'temporary resident' non-Europeans, who were not required to leave Australia, could become permanent residents and citizens after five years (the same as for Europeans).
The government also eased restrictions on immigration of non-Europeans. The criterion of 'distinguished and highly qualified' was replaced by the criterion of 'well qualified' non-Europeans, and the number of non-Europeans allowed to immigrate would be 'somewhat greater than previously'.
A watershed
The March 1966 announcement was the watershed in abolishing the 'White Australia' policy, and non-European migration began to increase. Yearly non-European settler arrivals rose from 746 in 1966 to 2,696 in 1971, while yearly part-European settler arrivals rose from 1498 to 6054.
In 1973 the Whitlam Labor government took three further steps in the gradual process to remove race as a factor in Australia's immigration policies.
These were to:
• legislate that all migrants, of whatever origin, be eligible to obtain citizenship after three years of permanent residence
• issue policy instructions to overseas posts to totally disregard race as a factor in the selection of migrants
• ratify all international agreements relating to immigration and race.
Because the Whitlam government reduced the overall immigration intake the reform steps that it took had very little impact on the number of migrants from non-European countries.
An increase in the number and percentage of migrants from non-European countries did not take place until after the Fraser government came into office in 1975.
Continuing the trend
In 1978 the government commissioned a comprehensive review of immigration in Australia. Far-reaching new policies and programs were adopted as a framework for Australia's population development.
They included three-year rolling programs to replace the annual immigration targets of the past, a renewed commitment to apply immigration policy without racial discrimination, a more consistent and structured approach to migrant selection and an emphasis on attracting people who would represent a positive gain to Australia.
The present
Australia's current Migration Program allows people from any country to apply to migrate to Australia, regardless of their ethnicity, culture, religion or language, provided that they meet the criteria set out in law.

At March 2010 the estimated population for Australia was 22.27 million people. At 30 June 2009 around one quarter of the estimated resident population comprised of people born overseas. At the 2006 Census 45 per cent of Australian residents were either born overseas or have at least one parent born overseas.
Australians identify with some 250 ancestries and practise a range of religions. In addition to Indigenous languages, around 200 other languages are spoken in Australia. After English, the most common languages spoken are Italian, Greek, Cantonese, Arabic and Mandarin.
The government views Australia's cultural diversity as a source of both social and economic wealth.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This law has bought many cultures all around the world together, forming a country which embraces all cultures. Also him abolishing what was left of the Immigration Restriction Act 1901, also known as the Whit Australian Policy, showed the world Australia’s strong beliefs of multiculturalism. The is policy has bought in multiculturalism, which bought in things such as…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As said by Professor Jacubowicz, the idea behind the push for the expanded immigration program at the end of WWII, the idea was to bring in British migrants and Europeans who were most likely to assimilate into Australian society. Asians and Jews were believed not to be able to assimilate, hence their migration continued to be severely restricted.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conclusion of World War II brought about major change to Australia’s migration patterns, as well as contributing to the abolition of the “White Australia Policy” and the gradual decrease in the country’s discriminatory views against non-white immigrants. It additionally set in place a series of motions that would radically change Australia’s immigration population, together with its’ views on migration movements on a global scale. Historical sources reveal the changes to subsequent Australian governmental…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gough Whitlam Case Study

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The abolition of the White Australia Policy opened the way for a new immigration policy and improved relationships with Australian’s Asian neighbours…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The White Australia Policy describes Australia's previous approach to immigration which favoured applicants from certain countries.…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ESSAY ON WHY THERE WAS CONFLICT BETWEEN WHITE AND BLACK AUSTRALIANS IN THE NINTEENTH CENTURY…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    (Bridge C, 2014) William Hughes felt that the White Australia Policy of 1901 was threatened by the equality of different races. His successful lobbying prevented nations such as Japan from privately joining the League of Nations. Mr Hughes’ final request was for ownership of former German New Guinea. The Prime Minister believed the portion of land to be Australia’s ‘strategic front door,’ protecting us from attack and so securing our great nation’s safety.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For much of Australia’s history until Federation, British immigrants had composed a significant proportion of the population. Australia experienced an influx in Chinese immigration during the 1850s gold rushes and many people wanted to maintain a strong British heritage in Australia. British Australians were afraid that any available jobs would be taken by Asian immigrants, as they were prepared to work for less pay than British Australians. Queensland allowed the immigration of indentured labourers from the South Pacific islands to work in the cane fields. This created a fear among “white” Australians of racial conflict occurring in Australia, with the recent American civil war fresh in peoples minds. A fear of exotic disease and illness being introduced was common in British Australians, despite the number of diseases they had introduced when settling…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, many people believed a Federated Australia would help to make a "White Australia Policy" possible, by toughening immigration laws. Some colonies were opposed to this policy as they used foreign labour, which was often much cheaper than local labour. An example of this is Queensland, which employed Kanakas. Under the new constitution, not only the Kanakas, but also the much-feared Chinese, who came to Australia during the gold rush, would not be allowed into Australia. Thus Federation would eliminate unwanted foreigners, providing more employment for Australians.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The mistreatment of indigenous people started when the European’s took over Australia, and escalated over time. They were considered to be second class citizens. By the time of federation, in 1901, aboriginal people were not included in the constitution or the census and were excluded from society which was known as protectionism. The white Australians believed that they were helping the Aborigines by using the protection policies. But in reality these policies isolated them from their families, traditional land and removed them from their natural heritage and culture. The Aborigines were taught to live like the white Australians so the could assimilate into the white society and were often trained to be slaves for White People. Charles Perkins was an aborigine who like many was taken from his family and land. He was however treated well compared to what most Indigenous…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia After Ww2

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After WW2, Australia felt that the population was too small to defend itself in case of another event. It also felt that Australia needed an economic boost and an increase in the population was the way to do so. In a speech to parliament in 1944, Immigration Minister Arthur Calwell expresses the need for migrants; “…Only by filling this land can we establish a title to hold it” (House of Representatives, Debates, 1944, vol. HR177, p.935). The Chifley Labor government’s aim in the late 1940s was to attract British migrants to Australia with free passage or “assisted migration”. So the government used advertisements to go after the British in the 1950’s by using positive images such as “sunshine and smiles” to attract more citizens. The idea of owning your own home and living in a laid-back, liberal community appealed to some and so the government assisted the migrants in coming to Australia by providing them with accommodation, work and support. Yet the propaganda of “sunshine, salesmen and subsidies...” did not attract the numbers of British migrants needed to achieve the goals set, and so the Australian government broadened its migration policy to other areas of Europe.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia’s attitude towards the rights and freedoms of Aboriginals has changed drastically from 1920 to the present. It is evident that Australia has made a greater effort throughout the years, to bridge the gap between the rights and of Aboriginals and the rest of Australia. This has been improved by the implementation of different policies such as the Protection policy, Assimilation, Integration, Self Determination and Reconciliation.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Elysium Social Inequality

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Saul, B 2003,”From White Australia to Woomera: The story of Australian Immigration”, Journal Of Refugee Studies, 16, 4, pp. 449-450, SocINDEX with Full Text, EBSCOhost, viewed 9 April 2014…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 'Pacific Solution' made it common practice to take asylum seekers to the outskirts of Australia, such as Christmas Island. Boat arrivals were either taken to Christmas Island, Indonesia, Manus Island or Nauru. This change of law made it much easier for Australia to bypass Australian law and discourage other illegal…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    like America, into New South Wales country towns and protesting in sections where Aboriginal people were rejected; such as being “often refused service in shops, made to stand aside while others were served, confined to their own section in cinemas, banned from clubs and pubs, and excluded from public swimming pools”5.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays