Preview

19th Century, Native American Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
694 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
19th Century, Native American Policy
“During the second half of the 19TH century, the United States Government took all appropriate actions to maintain peace with Native American tribes. Furthermore the United States was justified in its aggressive measures used to seize land from unruly Native American tribes during the era.” There little validity in this statement. During this time period American troops were interloping on Native American territory, starting violence, and forcing them out of their homes. The hostility of American Soldiers toward these people led to several tragedies, such as the Sand Creek Massacre, The Battle of Little Bighorn, and The Battle at Wounded Knee. It can be observed that the United States was clearly not, in any way, shape, or form, attempting to maintain peace. Insensitivities on behalf of the United States led to several tragedies, the Sand Creek Massacre being a major event. On November 29, 1864, General John Chivington ordered troops to attack Chief Black Kettle and his people, after the chief and his people did everything in their power to keep peace between the opposing sides. To top it all off, most of the warriors in this tribe were off hunting buffalo, and the tribe was left undefended. Between seventy and eighty Natives were killed. The fighting didn’t end there. Several years later, on December 29, 1890, a great disaster occurred at nearby Wounded Knee Creek, South Dakota. James W. Forsyth and his men massacred the people of Chief Spotted Elk. Around 300 casualties were suffered. The Natives, however, hadn’t always suffered such devastating losses. Between the Sand Creek Massacre and Wounded Knee, at the Battle of Little Bighorn, Colonel George Custer was one of the leaders of the American soldiers who attacked Crazy Horse, Sitting Bull, and their people. On June 25-26, 1876, American Soldiers fought the Lakota, Cheyenne, and Arapaho tribes, suffering a severe loss. Although it may seem as though the Native Americans were ruthless savages, this proves

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crook lead a part of the army to attack the Indians.Sitting Bull had a vision of the army coming to attach the tribe then he warned the village to stay aware of the attack. June 17 Crook stopped thinking the Indians weren't going to attack then the Indians rode up on them then Crook and part of the army got blasted. On June 21 Custer meet up with at stone river with Cornell Gibson.There were 6,000 Indians and 1,800 were warriors.Then Custer order 110 men to go one side to scare them off but then they all get killed.All the men got killed…….…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Of the twelve troops of the Seventh Cavalry, Custer led five that hot Sunday into eternity and infamy at the battle of the Little Big Horn, and of his part of the regiment only one living thing escaped the deadly skill of the Sioux warriors. Bleeding from many arrow wounds, weak, thirsty and tired, there came straggling into the lines some days after the fight Keogh's splendid horse "Comanche". Who can ever even imagine the scene as the soldiers thronged around the gallant…

    • 5236 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1980 Dbq

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages

    "In examining the question how the disturbances on the frontiers are to be quieted, two modes present themselves, by which the object might perhaps be effected; the first of which is by raising an army, and (destroying the resisting] tribes entirely, or 2ndly by forming treaties of peace with them, in which their rights and limits should be explicitly defined, and the treaties observed on the part of the United States with the most rigid justice, by punishing the whites, who should violate the same. In considering the first mode, an inquiry would arise, whether, under the existing circumstances of affairs, the United States have a clear right, consistently with the principles of justice and the laws of nature, to proceed to the destruction or expulsion of the savages.... The Indians being the prior occupants, possess the right of the soil. It cannot be taken from them unless by their free consent, or by the right of conquest in case of a. just war. To dispossess them on any other principle, would be a gross violation of the fundamental laws of nature, and of that distributive justice which is the glory of a nation. But if it should be decided, on an abstract view of the situation, to remove by force the ... Indians from the territory they occupy, the finances of the United States would not at present…

    • 3003 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dances With Wolves

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The original novel centered around the Comanche of the Southern Plains. However, due to the fact that the film production company secured filming access to a herd of buffalo in South Dakota, a change of tribes occurred. The most significant historical error involves the winter campaign launched by the United States Army in search of Dances With Wolves and Ten Bears' band. The year is supposed to be 1864. No United States Army winter campaigns were launched against any Native Americans until November of 1868. The massacre that took place that month was led by Lt. Col. George A. Custer's 7th Cavalry against Chief Black Kettle's people of the Cheyenne Nation. It occurred at Washita Creek on Thanksgiving Day. The necessity to work more in harmony with our environment is a constant theme of our age, and it is interesting to see how a historical film can also accommodate modern concerns. “Loyalty and Betrayal”: Dunbar is honored by being given a commission early in the plot to take up a post of his own choosing, because of his loyalty to the Union army. We see the deep sense of loyalty within the Dakota people. Dunbar decides to leave the camp at the end of the film because of his feelings towards the Dakota and gives himself up to the…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dexter, Christian A. Review of Killing Custer: The Battle of Little Bighorn and the Fate of the Plains Indians. By James Welch and Paul Stekler. New York: W.W Norton Company, 1994.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A battle that had a remarkable impact to the Indians was the battle of Little Big Horn. This battle was between Seventh Cavalry and sitting Bull’s band of hostile Sioux. The name for this battle originates because it occurred on the little Big Horn river. The reason for this battle was because during that time period there was a lot of racism against the Indian and the Cavalry wanted to kill them all. There are many points of view that tell and explain what happened in the battle one which was U.S Major Reno. There is also Lakota Chief Red horse who was an eye witness of everything that occurred. Between U.S Major Reno and Lakota Chief Red Horse they both had similarities and differences in the claims that they make as they tell the war from their points of view.…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I did not want this and a group of my people fought against the General George Custer who was sent to force us to move to reservations. When we beat him at Rosebud Creek we attacked him again at Bull Run I said “Today is a good day to die.” I led a charge against Custer’s troops along with Sitting Bull and Gall. We destroyed Custer’s force. After that The White father sent Colonel Nelson to force my men to move to reservation. After being chased for many months we finally surrendered. When I moved to the reservation I was arrested by some soldiers when I resisted a soldier stabbed me in the stomach and I died later that night. The date was September 5, 1877. I was only twenty-seven years…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Custer's Last Stand

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A treaty had given the Sioux exclusive rights to the Black Hills, but when gold was later discovered in the area, white miners flocked to the territory. Despite the treaty, the U.S. government ordered the Indians away from the invading settlers and back to their reservations. Custer's job was to force the Indians back to their reservations. Some of the Indians refused to leave their sacred land, and other hunters were camped in remote places and never knew of the order. The U.S. Army prepared for battle anyway. Custer planned to attack the Indian camp from three sides. Chief Sitting Bull was ready for them. The first two groups, led by Captain Benteen and Major Reno, were immediately forced to retreat to one side of the river, where they continued to fight as best they could , Custer was not as lucky. Custer's troops charged the Indians from the north. Quickly encircled by their enemy, Custer and 265 of his soldiers were killed in less than an hour. The Indians retreated two days later when the troops Custer had been ordered to wait for arrived.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Indians were surrounded by the heavily armed United States troops on December 29th. “Surrounded by heavily armed troops, It’s unlikely that Big Foot’s Band would have started the Fight” (Wounded Knee, History.com). This shows that the United States had some preparedness for something that sounded like a battle or massacre to occur even before it actually happened because of all of the heavy weaponry they were carrying. “ Some historians believed that the 7th cavalry were deliberately taking revenge for the regiment’s defeat at Little Bighorn in 1876”(“Wounded Knee”, History.com Staff) . The United States had an advantage already and really from the beginning which is one of the reasons they started this. When a shot was fired, it really didn’t matter which side had fired it because the United States was ready for it which is why around 300 Indians including children were shot and killed. (Massacre At Wounded Knee, 1890, Eyewitness…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Government: On behalf of the Native American tribes, this letter is being written to address the issue of the Transcontinental Railroad. I am Chief Red Horse of the Lakota tribe and I would like to bring up that the railroad will affect the way of life of all of the Natives. This is the reason why we will not be putting up with the railroads going through our land. It is completely unfair for you to take over our land and push us off of it. This land is ours.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philadelphia has had a long standing immigration of Irish citizens. The highest immigration of Irish into Philadelphia however was during the 19th century. The central cause of this spike in immigration was due to the failed potato crop in Ireland, which later became known as the Great Famine. Over a million Irish people died of starvation, while nearly another two million emigrated. A large portion of this plight landed in America, primarily to the Eastern coast cities, because copious amounts of them were extremely poor. The Library of Congress explicates that the Irish “In the 1840s…comprised nearly half of all immigrants to this nation” (Immigration). The majority of these Irish immigrants followed the Catholic religion, while previous…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the United States had good reasons for kicking the Indians off their land like mining and housing for the extreme population growth, the United States wasn't justified in its treatment of the Native Americans during the period of Western Expansion.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The natives lay on the cold, damp earth, taking in their final breaths, before their hearts ceased beating, and came their demise. The Wounded Knee Massacre was one of the biggest and most violent confrontations between the Native Americans and the American people and government. It claimed as many as 300 or more of the 350 Indian lives in Wounded Knee Creek, South Dakota, and half of those killed were women and children. It was the final major clash between the Native Americans and the U.S. military, and it finally proved that white men are the “true savages” of humankind. Yes, the Native Americans’ resistance was justified. White Americans brought many atrocities upon the Native American people. The white men gave them unfulfilled promises, purloined their lands and decimated their people.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the government could not levy punishment, it was up to the elites, militias and the army to do so in the name of “civilized order.” Government authorities went so far as to hang and/or decapitated criminals, leaving their bodies in public as an example of the consequences of crime [2]. Some of the most bloody conflicts in America was George Washington's campaign against the Indians. Washington had a wishy-washy attitude when it came to what he was going to do and how he was going to attempt reconciliation between the Indians and the colonists. On one side of the token he approached the situation with a mind set of equality, rights for the Indians and fairness, on the other side of the token he used “punishment and offensive operations” to advance the westward migration [State of the Union p515]. However, when diplomatic efforts failed, Washington had no problem asserting his control via violent conquest. The highest death count of American soldiers occurred during November of 1789 when both General Harmar and General St lair were defeated by Little Turtle. Expansion with Honor, a concept that Washington wanted to displace the Indians “with honor” was finally enacted when General Wayne defeated Little Turtle at Fallen Timbers [Lecture wk 6]. Although Washingtons goal was to “gradually integrate the natives” because was…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    apwh

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both the North America and Latin America had problems with indigenous people. In both regions indigenous people were either killed or forced to move to marginal lands that were not needed. By the 1870’s colonists had pacified the most productive lands in Mexico and were forcing Amerindians to either convert to Euro-American society or to flee. At the battle at Wounded Knee creek, the tensions between indigenous people and Americans were most evident. Both the United States and Mexico had problems with indigenous people because of their need for more land, which was occupied, by those indigenous people.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays