I think I would like the challenge aspect of working as a forensic scientist the most because I enjoy things that require a great deal of thought.
I think I wouldn’t enjoy working with dead bodies as a forensic scientist because I dislike dead things.
2. Do you think you suffer from the "CSI effect"? Why or why not? What problems do you think this "effect" has on the criminal justice system?
I don’t think I suffer from the “CSI effect” because I understand the limits of reality and human error.
I think the “CSI effect” causes jurors and judges to have misconceptions about the quality of the evidence presented and the actual meaning of the evidence.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
5. When a bullet is retrieved, how is it marked for identification purposes? What should be avoided?…
- 601 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
2. It is important because it is society that scientists can out together, they have what they need.…
- 287 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
3. From the survey in the toxicology lab, would you be a good candidate to work in this area of forensic science? Why or why not?…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
1. i think the toughest part about securing a crime scene or collecting evidence would have to be the people. anytime there is a crime scene going on friends, neighbors, just people who want to see what happened come to watch. the tough part about this is that you have to keep the people back. if they get in they could easily compromise evidence or just destroy it generally.…
- 142 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Why do you think forensic scientists study bloodstain patterns? What can be learned from them?…
- 391 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Aconite is a poison that comes from the aconite plant. It produces a numb or tingling feeling wherever the aconite comes into contact with. Also it causes muscle weakness, abnormal heartbeat and respiratory failure.…
- 361 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Sheldon states that “we believe it is crucial for judges and lawyers to understand the juror expectations for forensic evidence.” It has become increasingly important that judges and lawyers understand the jurors needs in order for them to get a conviction. Sheldon believes that it is more of a “Tech Effect” that has more influence for jurors rather than the CSI Effect. (Sheldon, Par. 31) Sheldon explains that, “Our criminal justice system must find ways to adapt to the increased expectations of those whom we ask to cast votes of ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’.” (Sheldon par. 38) I see this as a way for the prosecution to get what they want in a case, meaning that we must evolve in such a way to gather better understandings and find more ways to provide evidence in a case to satisfy the needs of those we ask to…
- 1163 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The areas that I covered that would be the most interesting to me would be the medical examiner, I feel that being a medical examiner can be tough at times because you can’t mess anything up… but you always are putting the end to the puzzle and it never gets boring because there is a new case…
- 347 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In order to accurately depict how the CSI Effect strongly influences our society’s view on crime and courtroom proceedings, I will be comparing different CSI episodes to those methods and theories which apply. Throughout the paper, I will be explaining how CSI has shaped peoples’ minds in believing false claims and investigation beliefs. Watching and comparing episodes of CSI to the CSI Effect will be a prime reference in explaining how the media is placing a spin on CSI television shows.…
- 1164 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
2.Do you think you suffer from the "CSI effect"? Why or why not? What problems do you think this "effect" has on the criminal justice system? I think I suffer from the CSI effect, I got into forensic science when I watched Dexter, my favorite serial killer. It always showed how interesting forensic science is and would be out on the field. He got a lot of days off, and it seemed pretty easy, but he wasn’t always right. Well at times he was right because he’s gone through those situations, but sometimes in court he’d bring the wrong evidence and that would mess up the whole thing and the guy would walk. All of that made me want to get into forensic science, because it looked basic and easy.…
- 233 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
“The CSI Effect is a recent phenomenon that can be attributed to the influence of mass media. The term started appearing in legal lexicon in 2003; roughly 3 years after the show and its spin-offs became wildly popular options for the American public” (Heinrick 59). This so called “CSI Effect”, is creating major controversy in the courtroom. There is such a large different between what the media depicts and real forensic science that jurors now believe that they are more educated than prosecutors themselves. It is becoming extremely important that attorneys, judges, and anyone else involved in a case to be aware that jurors are expecting great things in regards to forensic evidence. If the “CSI Effect” is ignored within the courtroom, there is no telling what will happen. The guilty may be let free or the innocent could be wrongfully accused of something they didn’t do. In addition to the “CSI Effect”, another similar effect that has been formed because of CSI-type shows is the “Tech Effect”. The “Tech Effect” is very similar to the “CSI Effect” and is defined as a mentality in which jurors “hold higher expectations for forensic evidence because of the actual development in forensic technology” (Cole & Dioso-Villa 1345). Both the “CSI Effect” and the “Tech Effect” affirm that reality crime shows are changing the minds of its viewers, while some forensic accomplishments have been…
- 885 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The media has a tremendous impact on the area of forensic science. The CSI effect is when juries oftentimes acquit a defendant on the basis that there was a lack of forensic evidence. Therefore, prosecutors feel the need to explain more at length why there is a lack of forensic evidence, to deemphasize the CSI effect. Although, this does not always work in their favor. There is also the idea of how juries sometimes view the forensic scientist called in on a case. They tend to liken them to the characters they see on television and connote respective feelings of admiration or vice versa. There is also a lack of interest in forensics when it does not live up to the televised expectations.…
- 769 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Author Richard Willing analyzes the positive and negative effects of shows like CSI or CSI Miami. He talks…
- 636 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1.I do think that changing technologies make it easier to determine who is responsible for a crime. If it werent for such technologies we wouldnt of been so sure as to who had comittied the crime. We can trace DNA, hair, blood, and shoeprints. We are able to see how they murdered or committed the crime step by step.…
- 160 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
2. I think the most satisfying part of the job would be bringing justice to people who are no longer with us. I find it really rewarding to put some ones killer behind bars where they belong, and let the person that has been killed to finally rest in peace. That to me is really cool, and also working with all the latest technology to help you with the job.…
- 381 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays