Angry Men is a dramatic portrayal of what happens in a jury room after a murder trial in which the defendant is a young minority man who has allegedly killed his father with a switchblade knife. Eleven of the jurors are ready to declare a guilty verdict in the first five minutes‚ but one juror performs the Central Negative role in the group in order to save them from groupthink and also save the defendant from execution. Through this movie we would try to understand how individual behaviours work
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
‘guilty’ vote. By juror 3 allowing his emotional baggage to enter the jury room with him it is clear that from the beginning of the play‚ his personal experience with his son were physiologically too powerful for him to be able to make the right verdict for the defendant. Like the 3rd juror‚ juror 4‚ a stock broker who presents his points in a logical
Free Jury Not proven Verdict
Like any piece of fiction‚ whether it be a short story‚ play‚ or possibly a novel‚ all are written with a specific purpose in mind. Usually‚ authors of fictional writing take entertainment into consideration when mapping out the subliminal purpose they intend to display for their audience. Reginald Rose‚ the author of Twelve Angry Men‚ could have written this play for multiple reasons. However‚ as a reader‚ it is critical to conclude that it was written for at least two solid purposes instead of
Premium Jury Not proven Murder
dilemma long before hearing the facts of the case. Given his past experiences‚ he would feel more inclined to vote guilty as to punish and make an example of this boy so that other kids would think twice. In this case if the jury decided on a guilty verdict‚ the defendant would be put to death. People might make rash decisions based on emotional ties to certain subjects. For some it might be a moral dilemma‚ like Juror #8‚ or past experience with a similar situation‚ like Juror #3. Juror #3 even mentions
Premium Emotion Verdict Boy
1. What differences in values and beliefs could you see demonstrated in this film and how did this influence the decisions which were made? Give at least three examples I saw values and beliefs from one extreme to the other. Example 1 – It was automatically assumed‚ by juror 10‚ that because the defendant lived in the ‘slums’ he was violent and guilty. His personal beliefs affected his vote instead of the facts and evidence. He seem to value social status and beliefs more than the truth. Example
Free Jury Not proven Verdict
Juror #1: Non-confrontational‚ Juror #1 serves as the foreman of the jury. He is serious about his authoritative role‚ and wants to be as fair as possible. Juror #2: He is the most timid of the group. Just how timid? Well‚ this will give you an idea: For the 1957 adaptation of 12 Angry Men‚ director Sidney Lumet cast John Fielder as Juror #2. (Fielder is best known as the voice of “Piglet” from Disney’s Winnie the Pooh cartoons). Juror #2 is easily persuaded by the opinions of others‚ and cannot
Premium Jury Verdict Not proven
To what extent is reasonable doubt an effective safeguard in the jury system? In the play‚ Twelve Angry Men Reginald Rose depicts ‘reasonable doubt’ as an extremely effective defence in the jury system which leads to saving the accused from being sentenced. In the play the jurors are asked to determine whether the seventeen year old boy is ‘guilty’ of fatally stabbing his father beyond ‘reasonable doubt’ or not. Only Juror 8 plays a pivotal part in acquainting the other eleven jurors about ‘reasonable
Premium Jury Jury trial Verdict
as it uses its techniques to raise the play’s key ideas on prejudice in the court of jury‚ educate viewers on the triumph of justice‚ and emphasising the theme of conviction of the story. Prejudice is seen as one crucial issue in constituting a verdict for the jury‚ as two of the jurors are biased against the suspect of the murder. Language and characterisation of the jurors is crucial techniques in which Reginald uses to convey the bitterness of one of the jurors‚ Juror #10. In the play‚ he states
Free Jury Not proven Justice
“In reaching the verdict‚ the jurors reconsider both their understanding of the case and their understanding of themselves.” Discuss Twelve Angry Men‚ written by Reginald Rose in 1957‚ portrays the intense discussion between 12 jurors in the American jury about a 16 year old boy‚ who is accused of killing his own father‚ and charged with “premeditated homicide”‚ the most serious charge in court. It explores the flaws of human nature‚ and the impacts of misinterpretations of the case can have on
Premium Logic Jury Not proven
12 ANGRY MEN OVERVIEW 12 Angry Men is an American drama film written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet in 1957. Movie tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they on purpose the guilt or discharge of the defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt. 12 Angry Men explores many techniques of agreement building‚ and the difficulties encountered in the process‚ among a group of men whose range of personalities adds intensity and conflict. No names are used in the film:
Premium Jury Verdict