University of New Brunswick‚ Saint John Business Research Method BA 3129 Final exam By Eman Ib Instructor Gregory Fleet April 29‚ 2014 Chapter 4 After studying and extracting information from all the relevant work done previously‚ how does there searcher know which references‚ articles‚ and information should be given prominence in the literature survey? For this question‚ the answer is the researchers should start looking for the literature survey that straight as the information
Premium Scientific method Research
3. Describe norm referencing. norms provide the tool whereby children’s test performance can be compared with performance of reference group 4. Why does a test need to have validity? Reliability? Can you have one without the other? Test needs validity to make sure of clear directions when reading vocabulary and items that are appropriate for the objectives. Reliability to accurately determine the number of items used the length of the test‚ and the rating. No
Premium Psychometrics Normal distribution Standard deviation
reliability 11. Validity is present when: A) the test measures what it is supposed to measure B) measurement reflects truth C) measurement reflects theory correctly D) the test measures the same way each time 12. With regard to face validity‚ which of the following is true? A) face validity refers to whether or not the measure looks like it measures what it purports to measure B) many researchers go out of their way to make sure their scale does not have face validity C) face validity is the least
Premium Scientific method Science Theory
PART 3 Methodology Research Design My research approach is: (check one) _____ Descriptive. If descriptive‚ what are your variables? _____ Correlational. If correlational‚ what variable(s) will be correlated & with what other variable(s)? __X__ Quasi-Experimental / Experimental What is (are) the independent variable(s)? What is (are) the dependent variable(s)? My research design is: (describe your study design) Population and Sample
Premium Sampling Informed consent Psychometrics
reliability and validity as they relate to ethnography‚ and will discuss the importance of context to ethnographic inquiry. In the final part of the chapter‚ I shall highlight some of the ’central concerns of this topic by contrasting psychometry and ethnography‚ The chapter seeks to address the following questions: • - What do we mean by ethnography? • - What are the key principles guiding ethnographic research? • - How might one deal with threats to the reliability and validity of this type of
Premium Ethnography
scale did not offer any cue for improvement. Feedback from respondents also did not throw new light on item wordings except for suggesting minor editorial correction of replacing “is conflicting” with “conflicts” in the last three statements. Face validity of this version of SRD scale‚ therefore‚ could not be doubted. Labelled as SRD-1‚ the updated NORS version of SRD scale was taken up for enhancement in this study. Labelled as 1a‚ 1b‚ 1c‚ 1d‚ 1e‚ 1f‚ 1g‚ SRD-1 comprised the following items. (1a)
Premium Psychology Management Cognition
resources‚ each with a different predictive validity on the predictive accuracy model. When an organisation is deciding which method of selection to use they may consider the most cost effective (Beardwell and Holden‚ 2001) or rely on predictive validity. Psychometric Testing Essentially there are two kinds of tests used for selection assessment – cognitive and personality tests. Cognitive tests‚ tests of general intelligence have high predictive validity across a wide range of jobs (Hunter and
Free Psychometrics
the least suitable candidates. The validity of personality tests has to be considered when being used for selection purpose. A high face validity of tests can increase the likelihood of faking tests; yet low face validity can result in the personality tests being rejected by candidates. Practitioners have to also take into account a number of ethical issues before using personality tests in a work setting. Key Words: Personality testing; Faking; Validity; Recruitment; Ethics. Introduction
Premium Personality psychology Clinical psychology Psychology
The internal‚ external‚ and construct validity are all affected by the use of a quasi-experimental design‚ and play an important role in assessing the program outcomes. Internal validity of a program is the extent to which a causal conclusion is warranted‚ and this is “determined by the comparability of its experimental and control groups” (text 186). To address internal validity a comparison group must be created‚ which it was in the case of OSGV. The comparison
Premium Criminology Crime
(DASS): The study of Validity and Reliability Ahmet AKIN* Bayram ÇET‹N** Abstract This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). The sample of the study consisted of 590 university students‚ 121 English teachers and 136 emotionally disturbed individuals who sought treatment in various clinics and counseling centers. Factor loadings of the scale ranged from .39 to .88. Findings from discriminant validity showed that the DASS
Premium Psychometrics Factor analysis Reliability