Provide an example in which you can use deductive reasoning to draw a conclusion. State the axioms or premises used to reach the conclusion. Karen knows if she misses cheerleading practice the day before a game that she will not be able to cheer at the game. Karen misses practice on Tuesday‚ the day before the game. Karen was not allowed to cheer at Wednesday’s game. Deductive Reasoning: (Premises) Fact: Karen knows if she misses cheerleading practice the day before a game she will not
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning
Deductive reasoning Deductive reasoning happens when a researcher works from the more general information to the more specific. Sometimes this is called the “top-down” approach because the researcher starts at the top with a very broad spectrum of information and they work their way down to a specific conclusion. For instance‚ a researcher might begin with a theory about his or her topic of interest. From there‚ he or she would narrow that down into more specific hypotheses that can be tested. The
Premium Logic Deductive reasoning Reasoning
Erin Callihan‚ AIUSA‚ states that "Increased national security should not equate to decreased civil liberties. All people are entitled to due process and other basic human rights and constitutional protections" (Amnesty International). Racial Profiling‚ according to Amnesty International‚ occurs when race is used by law enforcement or private security officials‚ to any degree‚ as a basis for criminal suspicion in non-suspect specific investigations. The Constitution‚ which is arguably the most important
Premium United States Race Racial profiling
9-17-13 Two forms of argument 1) Deductive= provides logically conclusive spport for the conclusion Valid-if the premises are true then the conclusion cannot be false Invalid- it fail to provide support Sound-the argument is valid and the premises are all true Unsound- an argument with true premises that lead to a false conclusion 2) Inductive-provides probable support for the conclusion Strong-premises are true conclusion is probably true cogent-premises are true argument is strong Weak-in
Premium Logic Argument
November 5‚ 2012 Deductive Arguments and Fallacies in the Presidential Debates Politics has always been one of the subjects where people use all sorts of different words and styles to convince people that their choices are the right choices. It isn’t surprising that one of the easiest places to find deductive arguments and fallacies is during one of the largest broadcasted and viewed political events‚ the Presidential Debates. In this paper I will point out a deductive argument and a fallacy from
Premium
Discussion 1 Deductive Language Construct a deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then‚ construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form. Discussion 2 Inductive Language Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then‚ explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger‚ either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. Week 1 Discussion 1 Consider an argument you have
Premium Logic Argument Inductive reasoning
Lindsey Lane October 21‚ 2012 The Importance of Deductive Reasoning Critical Thinking Kevin White It is important to understand what is known prior to making a decision because the decision could be either wrong or right. Making decisions at times can be a hard thing to do. There are many pros and cons for decision making. In argument five To Cheat or Not to Cheat Jenna has a big decision to make. She has to decide whether or not she wants to continue her class by being honest or to
Premium Decision making Logic Critical thinking
Harrison Bergeron made a valid argument against conformity. Harrison was smarter than the average person‚ so the government came up with a way to make him equal‚ they placed headphones onto his head so that they would buzz to distract him and make him think like the average person. Harrison had a problem with this as the passage says‚ “Harrison smashed his headphones and spectacles against the wall” (Vonnegut 3). Harrison smashed his headphones and spectacles in anger because he was tired of being
Premium Julius Caesar Roman Republic Nineteen Eighty-Four
Deductive versus Inductive When presenting a logical argument the process of supporting the conclusion comes from the premises provided. Therefore‚ to stand up and present his or her beliefs‚ then will need a form of logical‚ deductive‚ and inductive reasoning to establish your argument. In the approach of a valid argument‚ there are seven rules of deductive inference and they are Modus Ponens‚ Modus Tollens‚ Hypothetical Syllogism‚ Disjunctive Syllogism‚ Conjunction‚ Simplification
Premium Logic
Language | Describes something as something else. | She was a fox. | Generalisation | Broad statements inferred from specific cases | "This was poor behaviour was modelled by parents…" | Statistics and Expert Opinion | Material used to support an argument: * Facts and stats * Expert testimony * Research findings * Anecdotal effects | "The cities 1.5 million dollar debt…." | Inclusive Language | Use of personal pronouns to involve or exclude groups | "we all have a role to play…" | Vivid
Premium Logic Democracy Rights