Modernity is defined as the state or quality of being modern and the theories of development have emerged as a result of this concept. Sociology and Modernity developed hand in hand and were based on similar foundations. Rational forms of thought and organisation; a belief in the ability and right of humans to shape and control their own lives; faith that technology and science could fix human problems and reliance upon manufacturing industries to improve living standards are some of the concepts
Premium Sociology Development
Chapter I RAWLS THEORY OF JUSTICE 1.1) Introduction John Rawls‚ a modern and one of the most influential philosophers‚ who held the James Bryant Conant University Professorship at Harvard University and Fulbright Fellowship at Christ Church‚ Oxford‚ published several books and many articles. He wrote a series of highly influential articles in the 1950s and ’60s that helped refocus on morals and political philosophy on substantive problems. He is widely regarded as one of the most important political
Premium Political philosophy John Rawls A Theory of Justice
John Rawls bases his Theory of Justice on the intuitive conviction that justice as fairness is the first virtue of social institutions. He argues that in order to ensure fair distributions of advantages in society‚ a workable set of principles are required in order to determine how institutions ought to distribute rights and duties and to establish a clear way to address competing claims to social advantages. The second principle that Rawls develops stipulates that economic and social inequalities
Premium John Rawls A Theory of Justice Original position
Distributive Justice Part I – Introduction John Rawls’ Theory of Justice is based on the idea of distributive justice‚ that is‚ how justice should be distributed to each individual within a society. Rawls’ theory contrasts with the theory of utilitarianism‚ because it values the welfare of each individual over the ‘greater good’‚ and does not believe that one person should sacrifice their own needs or desires in order to benefit a larger number of people. This has led Rawls to develop the idea
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy
3.3. Robert Nozick on John Rawls. The publication of A Theory of Justice of Rawls is extensively acknowledged as an essential contribution to the notion of justice. However‚ his work raises many questions. One of the major responses to the book came from Robert Nozick in his book‚ Anarchy‚ State‚ and Utopia. Nozick offers a libertarian response to Rawls. Libertarian notion of politics implies that there is a recognition of natural human rights and if these rights are deprived would be an immoral
Premium Political philosophy Justice John Rawls
What is Distributive Justice? Distributive justice is generally referred to as fairness regarding the pattern of distribution among individuals. In order for distributive justice to be met‚ it is necessary for goods to be distributed fairly or justly. Goods are anything that holds value to any person(s); if something does not have any value then it is not a good. Value is the main requirement for something to be considered a good; therefore‚ not only physical goods hold value. Thus‚ such things
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy Justice
The conventional accounts of Justice normally begin by stating a fundamental rule of Aristotle – Justice is to treat equals equally and unequals unequally‚ and that unequal treatment should be in proportion to the inequality. In everyday life though‚ justice is seen as an attribute of law‚ while all laws are not necessarily just. Many great socio- political movements of the world have focused from time to time on unjust laws eg Apartheid laws in South Africa and Caste laws in India. Impartiality
Premium John Rawls Justice Political philosophy
The concept of justice has been the focus of normative political theory over the past 50 years‚ and John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice (1971) is widely seen as the most important attempt during that period to articulate a set of institutions and distributional outcomes that rational individuals would see as legitimate. Rawls’ seminal work has spawned a veritable critical industry since its publication (Miller‚ 1999). His elaboration of his project and restatement of his theory of “justice as fairness”
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy
In A Theory of Justice‚ John Rawls argues for the theory of “justice as fairness‚” a theory that is grounded in the hypothetical contract of the original position. Ronald Dworkin argues against the practicality and applicability of a doubly hypothetical agreement‚ - “a hypothetical question about hypothetical reactions” - which occurs in original position (D’Agostino). Here‚ I will explore Rawls’s arguments and assess the legitimacy of Rawls’s assumptions and claims. I will also discuss the arguments
Premium Political philosophy Ethics John Rawls
Conceptions of justice can be broken down into two separate classifications. Firstly‚ there is the idealistic conception of justice and secondly the realistic conception of justice. The idealistic side of conceptions focuses on an expectation of fairness and a desire for a universal level of fairness whereas‚ the realistic conception focuses on the acceptance of chance and fate and the reality of risk and consequence. John Rawls ‘A theory of justice’ falls under the idealistic conception of justice. He described
Premium Political philosophy Justice John Rawls