injunction.4 Respondent alleged that it is the owner of the tradename "IN-N-OUT" and trademarks "IN-N-OUT‚" "IN-N-OUT Burger & Arrow Design" and "IN-N-OUT Burger Logo‚" which are used in its business since 1948 up to the present. These tradename and trademarks were registered in the United States as well as in other parts of the world.5 On June 2‚ 1997‚ respondent applied with the IPO for the registration of its trademark "IN-N-OUT Burger & Arrow Design" and servicemark "IN-N-OUT." In the course of its
Free Trademark Intellectual property
[pic] Assignment on Intellectual Property Comparison Between Developed And Developing Country. Submitted to Fahmida Hasan Department of Business Administration Submitted by: |Razuan Ahmed 2010-2-10-071 Section : 1 Course No : BUS 361 Course Name: Legal Environment Of Business Transmittal
Premium Intellectual property Copyright Trademark
The Legality of Intellectual Property Rights under Islamic Law Silvia Beltrametti Intellectual property rights are not regulated by Islamic law and jurisprudence per se. The issue is whether the principles of Islamic law can be constructed in a way to provide support for such protection. This paper assesses the extent to which Islamic law and its sophisticated tools have an impact on the protection of intellectual property. First it presents Sharī’a’s main sources; the Qur’an‚ the Sunna‚ Ijma
Premium Property Copyright Intellectual property
Intellectual Property (IP) is legal rights that result from intellectual activity in the industrial‚ scientific‚ literary‚ and artistic fields. The four major components of intellectual property include; patent‚ copyright‚ industrial design‚ and trademark. A patent is a government grant giving the right to eliminate others from making‚ using or selling an invention. A Canadian patent is protection within Canada for 20 years from the date of filing of the patent application. The patent application
Premium Intellectual property Copyright Trademark
society considers fair and reasonable are in a conflict with the commercial interests of the rights holders‚ who are secured by legal protection. Ethical standards are in conflict with the legal. As a result‚ the loyal attitude of our society to the infringement of intellectual property rights makes its protection weaker. Indeed‚ the legal content of the intellectual property is very different from the traditional category of private property. In comparison‚ buying any object and getting a private property
Premium Law Copyright Trademark
opportunity to profit from his work. Commonly intellectual property is protected by the use of copyrights‚ trademarks‚ servicemarks‚ patents‚ industrial designs and trade secrets. A “copyright is a form of protection provided to the authors of “original works or authorship” including literary‚ dramatic‚ musical‚ artistic‚ and certain other intellectual works both published and unpublished”. A “trademark is a word‚ name‚ symbol or device which is used in trade with goods to indicate the source of the goods
Premium Copyright Intellectual property Trademark
enforcement costs of IP rights through enhanced enforcement measures. The second suspicion was that the enforcement provisions would not simply apply to counterfeited and pirated goods in commerce. Many believed that ACTA would also target to “willful infringements without motivation for financial gain to such an extent as to prejudicially affect the copyright owner.”[3] The final draft confirmed that these beliefs were true. ACTA was designed to target counterfeit and pirated goods‚ enforce digital IP rights
Premium Copyright Trademark Intellectual property
According to Devine (2011)‚ Intellectual Property are of four kinds -- copyrights‚ patents‚ trade secrets‚ and trademarks. The same source mentioned that copyright is a form in intellectual property that protects the original authors of both published and unpublished creations. Copyrights have to do with someone writing or making something and have the rights to the article to call it theres. Patents are kind of the same thing the only difference is you came up with the idea and are now trying to
Premium Copyright Trademark Intellectual property
presented in the above case is whether the sale of copying equipment to the general public violates any of the rights granted under the Copyright Act. The outcome was that the sale of VTR ’s to the general public did not constitute contributory infringement of respondents ’ copyrights. According to the information presented within the decision‚ it was explained that since intellectual property such as copyrights‚ is statutory in
Premium Copyright Property Intellectual property
Federation of Coffee Growers in Colombia‚ with different representative layers from the grassroots up to the national level‚ can be an example to Vietnam. Vietnam is well known in the world in terms of coffee quality‚ but does not have a national trademark for coffee. Vietnam should consider a label similar to Colombia’s “100 per cent Colombian coffee” label. Although Vietnam’s government is encouraging the transition from Robusta to Arabica varieties to improve added value‚ some businesses are afraid
Premium Marketing Value added Coffee