Title: Theories of Justice Compare and contrast each of the three theories of justice Provide illustrative examples of each theory Write a conclusion identifying your preferred theory of justice along with your rationale for choosing the theory Retribution (Deserts Theory) This theory states that people should be punished only if they have done something to deserve it‚ and only to the extent to which it is deserved. This theory is only concerned with the past‚ which means it supports
Premium Punishment Criminal justice Justice
Rawls Theory of Justice A contemporary philosopher‚ John Rawls (1921-2002)‚ is noted for his contributions to political and moral philosophy. In particular‚ Rawls ’ discussion about justice introduced five important concepts into discourse‚ including: the two principles of justice‚ the “original position” and “veil of ignorance”. Rawls most famous work is‚ A Theory of Justice (1971) gives an introduction to this body of thought and he emphasises the importance justice has on governing and organising
Premium John Rawls
people of all social‚ financial and ethnic levels forms the basis of who I am professionally and personally. In this course‚ we learned about ethical theories and theories of justice as it relates to moral rights and social justice. These theories have exerted influence on my leadership style as a middle school principal. Theory of social justice is important to me as a leader. As a leader‚ I am cognizant and refuse to be oblivious to the fact equity in resources and opportunities is not an option
Premium
The concept of restorative justice centers on a mutual understanding between the offender and community in regards to the offender’s previous criminal acts. This theory focuses on repairing harm the offender inflicted on the community in a non-retributive manner. With the assistance of the community‚ victims and the cooperation of the offender‚ this theory points the ability to repair the criminal in a non-traditional means. The traditional mindset being of the community or society seeing an offender
Premium Criminology Criminal justice Restorative justice
In Plato’s Republic he defines justice as “doing one’s own work and not meddling with what is not one’s own” (Plato 139‚ 433b). This definition begs the question what is one’s own work? Plato states that one’s own work is the work that one’s nature is best suited for‚ as each person is born with a different nature (Plato 101‚ 370b). To come to this definition Plato compares justice within the human soul to justice within a city. If Plato can find justice within the city and prove that the individual
Premium Plato Philosophy Virtue
to reduce recidivism. Earlier the role of a federal court system was to bring together the administration and judges (Cohen and Spitzer‚ 1996). The role of a judicial official is to administer procedural justice that helps a defendant to accept accountability. The Procedural Justice Theory suggests that a person will see rulings as legitimate‚ and adopt the court’s value and goals (Wales et al.‚ 2010). O’Scannlain (2010) states the role of the federal judge is to apply the Constitution of the
Premium Law United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Ideas of social justice are both changeable and contestable. These ideas differ between individuals and societies. The term social justice is ambiguous but can briefly be summed up as - social justice involves having the capabilities to voice feelings and opinions but also for these to be heard. To do so‚ there has to be an active participation within society in order to shape it. In short‚ social justice focuses on the individual and their values and beliefs. Social harm refers to the harm
Premium Sociology Justice Political philosophy
Imperative which is the central philosophy of his theory of morality‚ and an understandable approach to this moral law. It is divided into three formulations. The first formulation of Kant’s Categorical Imperative states that one should “always act in such a way that the maxim of your action can be willed as a universal law of humanity”; an act is either right or wrong based on its ability to be universalized. This belief is part of the “universal law theory” and states that to determine if an action is
Premium Discrimination Immanuel Kant Morality
Hayek and Rawls take different paths along their journey to reach what they believe the proper form of distributive justice would be. They both follow liberal ideology‚ focusing more on the individual. Hayek follows a line of thinking based on liberty‚ utility‚ and a “economic order based on the market‚” and with that with that economic order comes capitalism as the most viable option for the society (Hayek‚ LLL p.68). Hayek believes that this society will offer the best opportunities for access
Premium John Rawls Liberalism Political philosophy
the reader: a) an understanding of the different definitions that reparative justice can adopt; and b) the functioning of the reparatory regime in the International Criminal Court (ICC) as established in the legal instruments which is based on. Reparative justice: theoretical definitions In order to create a wider scope of what reparations are or should be like and their ultimate finality‚ different reparative justice perspectives are exposed . These viewpoints comprehend various authors stemming
Premium Law Crime Criminal law