This would explain my high score in the affiliative style. I would say that I tend to maintain positive relationships with atleast 90-95% of those whom I work with and also those outside of work. Although the description is quite accurate in that teamwork and cooperation are important to me‚ I feel that there are times that I just need to pull away from people in order to get my work accomplished. In working in the quality assurance and testing department‚ my high score in achievement hits the mark
Premium Click Management Feedback
behalf of broad constituencies‚ as opposed for their own benefit. They tend to be persistent in a gentle way and tend to be persuasive while being respectful at the same time. I scored an 18 out of 25 on this section; around average for my other scores. This‚ to me‚ would mean I am right in the middle of these definitions‚ not too involved but involved enough to make a difference without stepping on toes; Just where I want to be. Secondly‚ an advocate is defined by the assessment to instinctively
Premium Scores A Good Thing
team gets 25 points‚ but they have to win by at least two points or the game will continue until that is achieved. If it goes to the third game or the tie breaker‚ the score will be to 15 but still having to win by two. Basketball‚ on the other hand‚ has a much higher scoring system. The two teams play for 20 minute halves‚ and can score as many points as the teams possibly can in the allotted time limit. If the teams are tied in
Premium Basketball Volleyball Difference
high score in the personality of reliable and successful indicate that both present and potential users are regarding the luxury watches as very competence. For non-users‚ unlike those present users‚ they don’t like the dimension of sophistication or ruggedness much because of the lower like score on brand personality of upper class and tough. Question 1.2Criteria/Processes: a. Category the brand personality score for each dimension as mentioned in Q 1.1. b. Calculate the sum score for each
Premium Brand Personality psychology
dissenting) you support and explain why. Refer to the rubric and scoring instructions on the next page to see how your teacher will grade your assignment. Answer: Rubric and Scoring Instructions Category 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points 5 points Score Content The letter does not fulfill the assignment. Content is not developed and ideas are confusing. The letter is so inadequate and flawed as to be unacceptable. The letter does not fulfill the assignment. Content is poorly developed and ideas are
Premium United States Understanding The Score
Group Climate Group climate consists of the overall sentiment that is displayed within a group. This includes the aspects of honesty‚ openness‚ consistency and respect according to "Teamwork" by Lefasto and Larson. When evaluating the characteristics of group climate in a team‚ the most prevalent component to examine is trust. Trust yields respect‚ acknowledgement‚ cohesiveness‚ a bridge between cultural differences and above all else‚ sensitivity to ideas being expressed so a consensus can
Premium Scores
I.E.1 What’s My Emotional Intelligence Score? Indicate your level of agreement with these ten statements using the following scale: 1 = Strongly disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neither agree or disagree 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly agree 1. I am usually aware-from moment to moment-of my feelings as they change. 2. I act before I think. 3. When I want something‚ I want it NOW! 4. I bounce back quickly from life’s setbacks. 5. I can pick up subtle social cues that indicate
Premium Emotional intelligence Intelligence quotient Emotion
ENGL 111 English Composition Statewide Online Course Library Assignment IvyTilt Activity 1 Getting Started HINT: Instead of printing out this document‚ view it online. That way you can click on the embedded links to go to the various links and tutorials. Before starting these activities‚ be sure your computer has Macromedia Flash Player and Adobe Shockwave installed. Most Ivy Tech regions have access to the main Virtual Library screens‚ but if there is a problem accessing your local library
Premium Citation Parenthetical referencing Bibliography
couple of their multiple choice quizzes to learn a little more about myself. I took the Anger Test‚ Arguing Style‚ Attention Span Test‚ and the Happiness Quiz. My score for the Anger Test was a 36. They said it was low which means I can cope well with angering situations but I could also be denying my true feelings. My Arguing Style quiz score was an 84. The description says that I argue in ways to end fights fast and to where the person and I are both satisfied. The third quiz‚ Attention Span Test‚
Premium A Great Way to Care Interpersonal communication Communication
the score. For each item‚ we marked the number of points that our score differs from expert ranking and then add up all the points. Difference between individual ranking and correct ranking gives the Individual Error Score‚ whereas difference between group ranking and correct ranking reveals Team Error Score. For our team calculated error scores are as follows: TOTAL ERROR SCORES | 1. Team Error score = 32 | A. Team Functioning (3-1) = 31 | 2. Average Individual Error Score = 48
Premium Team Member of Parliament Effectiveness