Appointed Judges “Objective: Examine the potential impact on judicial independence that results from the election of judges versus the appointment of judges.” While researching Texas appointed judges‚ I discovered that since 1845 when Texas become a state‚ judges were appointed until 1876 when judges were elected “by the people in the partisan elections” according to the website http://www.judicialselection.us/judicial_selection/index.cfm?state=tx. In addition‚ Texas has been electing their judges and
Premium United States President of the United States United States Constitution
determine the outcome of a life by trial in law; said person is the judge of the court system. A judge safeguards the law and holds the power of a god. Judges have left their mark throughout history by writing it themselves. The Salem Witch Trials are one of the nation’s most notorious cases of mass hysteria. Upwards of 150 people were accused and sent to trial. A judge would hear these trials and then choose life or death for these men and women. Only an effective judge should be placed in such a position
Premium Crime Law Prison
Judges do make law — it’s their job By Erwin Chemerinsky and Catherine Fisk Misleading and silly slogans about what judges do are dominating the debate about Supreme Court nominee John Roberts. President Bush and Republican politicians constantly repeat‚ as a mantra‚ that Roberts is a desirable choice because he won’t "legislate from the bench" and will merely "apply the law‚ not make it." But every lawyer knows that judges make law — it’s their job. In fact‚ law students learn in the first semester
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
When should a judge recuse himself or herself from a case? A judge should recuse himself or herself from a case when he or she may be biased towards a certain party. For example if a party might be a company in whom the judge has invested heavily‚ if its a friend or family member or the judge may feel that‚ for personal reasons where she or he may not be able to act impartially in case. What kinds of court cases are heard by federal courts? Name at least three
Premium Jury Supreme Court of the United States Court
the British Constitution. If judges were to make law then they would be contradicting this doctrine. The legislative supremacy disqualifies the courts power to review the validity of legislation‚ refer to British Railway Board v Pickin . The objective of judges is to not make law but simply declare what the law had always been. Acts of Parliament are the highest form of authority and the courts hands are tied by it. But through the doctrine of precedent‚ the judicial function of declaring and applying
Premium Common law Law Appeal
Federal v. State Courts The United States is at the forefront of modern democracy. Its unique three branched system allows the government to operate under a quasi-idealistic form of checks and balances. As outlined by the U.S. Constitution‚ the judicial branch of government serves as the interpreter of the law and is “one of the most sophisticated judicial systems in the world.”1 This complexity is a product of balance and structure in the form of a judicial hierarchy‚ with the Supreme Court at
Premium United States United States Constitution Law
The Role of the Judge Judges play many roles. They interpret the law‚ assess the evidence presented‚ and control how hearings and trials unfold in their courtrooms. Most important of all‚ judges are impartial decision-makers in the pursuit of justice. We have what is known as an adversarial system of justice - legal cases are contests between opposing sides‚ which ensures that evidence and legal arguments will be fully and forcefully presented. The judge‚ however‚ remains above the fray‚ providing
Free Jury Judge Law
such thing as judge-made law‚ for the judges do not make the law‚ though they frequently have to apply existing law to circumstances as to which it has not previously been authoritatively laid down that such law is applicable.” Generally‚ the position judges adopted is to interpret the law instead of concerning with the justice of their decisions. In modern tie‚ there is still existence of powerful ideology that denies any creative role to judges. The popular view of the judges is not to give
Free Common law Precedent Stare decisis
JAMAICA runs to make CCJ final court of appeal! Rate: 1Flag ------------------------------------------------- Top of Form Click "Submit Abuse" if you feel this post is inappropriate. Explain why below if you wish. Cancel Bottom of Form Should the Caribbean Court of Justice become the final court of appeal for Jamaica? The ongoing lobby for the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) to become the final court of appeal for Jamaica has become a conflict of great interest to many Jamaicans and members of
Premium Caribbean Community Jamaica Appeal
Volume 13‚ Issue 1. January 1‚ 2002 - January 14‚ 2002. How to Judge Globalism Amartya Sen [http://people.cis.ksu.edu/~ab/Miscellany/globalism.html] Globalization is often seen as global Westernization. On this point‚ there is substantial agreement among many proponents and opponents. Those who take an upbeat view of globalization see it as a marvelous contribution of Western civilization to the world. There is a nicely stylized history in which the great developments happened in Europe:
Premium Globalization Western culture