"The dangers of groupthink case study" Essays and Research Papers

Sort By:
Satisfactory Essays
Good Essays
Better Essays
Powerful Essays
Best Essays
Page 4 of 50 - About 500 Essays
  • Good Essays

    The term groupthink originated in 1952 in Fortune magazine by the author William Whyte. The theory‚ however‚ was not researched or clearly defined until around 1972 by Irving Janis. Whyte acknowledged that groupthink was a definition in progress; Janis picked up and further developed the study many years later. Groupthink is defined as a group’s inability to make correct decisions as a result of the implied need for group cohesion. “Janis provides a series of statements that collectively are

    Premium Decision making

    • 3541 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Groupthink and polarization impacted the kids throughout the film; the class decided that they should have a name‚ and a uniform to set them apart from the rest. The students then started hanging out with only other in the class‚ and created a handshake. Group thinking caused the class to join into as one‚ they all had each others’ backs; Tim was getting bullied by a few students‚ that weren’t in the cult‚ and a few of the members in the wave came to rescue and punk the other guys. Polarization

    Premium Marriage Woman Love

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Groupthink Bad?

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Groupthink is a deterioration of mental efficiency‚ reality testing‚ and moral judgment that results from in-group pressure (Verderber‚ Verderber‚ & Sellnow‚ 2011). Groups affected by groupthink ignore alternatives and tend to take irrational actions that dehumanize other groups (Miller‚ 2010). A group is especially vulnerable to groupthink when its members are similar in background‚ when the group is insulated from outside opinions‚ and when there are no clear rules for decision making (Miller

    Premium Decision making Space Shuttle Decision theory

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prabhjot Kaur Communication Theory Final Paper ASSUMPTIONS: A high level of cohesiveness is usually present when groupthink occurs‚ and there is a great reluctance on the part of group members to stray from the group’s position. They do not want to leave‚ be forced out‚ or be ignored by other members. This “oneness” associated with cohesiveness is typically a desirable condition except when the group relies too much on solidarity that the desirable ends are not focused on. They are likely

    Premium Decision making Decision theory Flipism

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    How does the theory of groupthink apply to the 1986 Challenger disaster? Here is a brief trailer for a larger analysis of the disaster: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3K2vqVAG7iI Do you‚ or does the literature‚ think that NASA ’s organizational culture was also to blame for the 2003 Columbia disaster‚ or was the problem of groupthink alleviated in the intervening 17 years? Please use your text and online research about the administrative issues that led to this disaster. Remember to cite

    Premium Space Shuttle Columbia Space Shuttle Challenger Space Shuttle

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4) Groupthink is when individuals held back their stating views in a meeting and agreed to someone else’s position or can go along with the boss suggestion when in fact the individual disagreed with suggestions. These caused a highly cohesive teams to lose their critical evaluative capabilities. There are several symptoms of groupthink such as illusions of invulnerability‚ Belief in inherent group morality‚ self-censorship by members‚ illusions of unanimity‚ mind guarding‚ rationalizing

    Premium Psychology Morality Ethics

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Danger

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay Danger Noun[edit] danger (plural dangers) (obsolete) Ability to harm; someone’s dominion or power to harm or penalise. See In one’s danger‚ below. "You stand within his danger‚ do you not?" (Shakespeare‚ Merchant of Venice‚ 4:1:180)  [quotations ▼] (obsolete) Liability.  [quotations ▼] (obsolete) Difficulty; sparingness. (Can we find and add a quotation of Chaucer to this entry?) (obsolete) Coyness; disdainful behavior. (Can we find and add a quotation of Chaucer to this entry?)

    Premium Latin French language Romance languages

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to study.com website (2015)‚ a groupthink can simply be defined as an occurrence that gives a group of people a fault verdict or a conclusion a that a group has made that is an ineffective decision whereby it was reached just to appease the spirit of harmony among group members than allowing individuals to act independently and creatively. As alluded on‚ groupthink blocks individual creativity by ignoring alternatives allowing irrational actions to tale precedence. It happens most when

    Premium United States Iraq War 2003 invasion of Iraq

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Groupthink Research Paper

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Groupthink is when you are placed in a situation where a group of people believe that the majority vote is the best idea‚ that everyone has the same idea so not everyone speaks up‚ and a limit to the individual thought process. The consequence of this process is that not all ideas or thoughts are express. This means that right or the best option to a problem is never expressed. In a group the majority vote makes one idea get voted over another which means that some people individual ideas get covered

    Premium Thought Ethics Psychology

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How to Avoid Groupthink

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Avoiding the Groupthink Trap • Remain impartial. The leader should not take a directive role but should remain impartial. • Seek outside opinions. The leader should invite outside opinions from people who are not members of the group and who are less concerned with maintaining group cohesiveness. • Create subgroups. The leader should divide the groups into subgroups that first meet separately and then meet together to discuss their different recommendations. • Seek anonymous opinions. The

    Premium Decision making Decision theory Decision making software

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50