Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Court and Year Full High Court 2007 District Court of Queensland 2010 New South Wales Court of Appeal 2011 Relevant Facts Home purchased at $250000 with mortgage payment of $200000 Ms Clayton unable to keep up with payments After substantial period of default‚ banks sells sold property at auction for $150000. After deduction of sale‚ Bank seeks payment of the guarantor Ms Clayton claim guarantee not enforceable on her because of misunderstanding Ms Clayton alleges
Premium Law Real estate Jury
The conviction of a Royal Marine for murdering an injured Afghan insurgent should not "besmirch" the organisation‚ Prime Minister David Cameron has said. Speaking to marines at Downing Street‚ Mr Cameron said the "appalling" case in no way represented the spirit and proud history of the Royal Marines. The sergeant‚ identified only as Marine A‚ was convicted over the shooting of the unknown man in 2011 on Friday.The conviction of a Royal Marine for murdering an injured Afghan insurgent should
Premium Royal Marines Marine United States Marine Corps
Page 1 1 of 3 DOCUMENTS M.A. MORTENSON COMPANY‚ INC.‚ Petitioner‚ v. TIMBERLINE SOFTWARE CORPORATION and SOFTWORKS DATA SYSTEMS‚ INC.‚ Respondents. No. 67796--4 SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON 140 Wn.2d 568; 998 P.2d 305; 2000 Wash. LEXIS 287; CCH Prod. Liab. Rep. P15‚893; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (Callaghan) 357 October 26‚ 1999‚ Oral Argument Date May 4‚ 2000‚ Filed PRIOR HISTORY: [***1] Appeal from Superior Court‚ King County. 95--2--31991--2. Honorable Phillip Hubbard‚ Judge. DISPOSITION: Court
Premium United States Appeal Supreme Court of the United States
agent that she ought to follow up on the legitimate instruction of the principal. Ian should not cheated Sarah. She must followed Sarah instruction to sold artwork. To obey the principal’s instructions- Section 164‚ Contracts Act 1950 . In Bostock v Jardine‚ the agent was liable when he bought more than he was directed to buy. Ian must showing accounts and return of undue profit. It is the duty of an agent that she ought to keep up the records appropriately and submit it to the principal on her
Premium Fiduciary Agency law Agency
In the Greynolds v. Kurman case‚ I agree with the court’s decision. “There was sufficient evidence to support a finding of lack of informed consent” (Pozgar & Santucci‚ 2015‚ p. 339). When I read the case it seemed like the physicians did not put any effort in explaining the complete picture‚ including the Greynolds options‚ and letting them decide what they wanted. By law‚ “when there is doubt as to a patient’s capacity to consent‚ the consent of the legal guardian or next of kin should be obtained”
Premium Patient Health care Health care provider
The case Miller v. California (1973) was determined by the Supreme Court‚ which redefined the meaning of obscenity. The word obscene is hard to define and could be seen as “You will know it when you see it.” The Miller case determined if something was obscene‚ the average person‚ applying the standards must find the entire work‚ as obscene‚ the work depicts offensive sexual conduct defined by state law‚ and that the work as a whole lacks literary‚ artistic‚ political‚ or scientific value. Marvin
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Homer objected to being required to study for a law degree. The normal retirement age in the PNLD was 65‚ and it would have taken Mr Homer at least
Premium Violence Nuclear power Electricity generation
A Royal Salute to the Commonwealth In the article “A Royal Salute to the Commonwealth” Peter Oborne responds the critique and gives an image of how an important and influential role the Commonwealth will play in the future. Furthermore‚ he expresses his support and tries to force the reader to take a stand. Peter Oborne takes his starting commentary on Duke William and Duchess Kate’s first visit to Canada. Oborne followed them on their royal holiday when they visited Canada’s National War Memorial
Premium World War II Paragraph British Empire
v. Cruikshank (1876). This case took place during the Reconstruction period of the south in Grand Parish‚ Louisiana. During this time there were many changes being made in the state and local government positions. In 1873 the governor of Louisiana appointed a new Judge
Premium United States Constitution United States United States Bill of Rights
of Right to Counsel In the 16th and 17th century‚ the law did not allow or provide for the use of attorneys in any court case‚ except for treason cases. It wasn’t until the 18th century in which the defendants were allowed to have an attorney. The constitution allowed for the use of attorneys‚ but most defendants represented themselves‚ while
Premium United States Constitution Law United States