Professor Anderson Philosophy 150 22 February‚ 2013 Teleological Argument: Existence of God The teleological argument is one made for the existence of God. William Paley’s argument is based on the idea that the universe is too complicated to have been created by accident and so must have had a creator. This creator is assumed to be God‚ who has created the universe and all the parts in it serve a certain purpose. A close consideration of this argument will show that there are several problems with it
Premium Metaphysics Existence God
ontological argument for the existence of God while restating and critically examining Aquinas’s first argument for the existence of God. After I finish with that topic I will then take on Paley and his argument and whether or not it thoroughly proves the existence of God conceived as a supremely perfect being and why or why not this is. During this topic I will bring in Dawkins’ and Hume’s criticisms of the argument also I will try to differentiate between Aquinas’ fifth cosmological argument from the
Premium Teleological argument Cosmological argument Intelligent design
had many arguments against believing in miracles; he stated that there was not enough evidence of miracles in order to outweigh our general experience. There are also insufficient witnesses; miracles must be witnesses by a good educated person. According to Hume‚ miracles only happened to uneducated and insane people. Hume never questioned if miracles occur however he did question if a miracle can prove god’s existence. Swinburne is another philosopher and he criticised Hume’s argument. Swinburne
Premium Metaphysics Atheism David Hume
Design Argument--Does God exist? I found William Paley’s design argument in The Watch and the Watch-Maker the most compelling and thought provoking because I thought he had an interesting point symbolizing the watch as the universe and the watch-maker as the universe-maker or God. Paley doesn’t give a scientific explanation‚ but instead bases his work on observation and logical thinking unlike Robin Collins’s argument in his work‚ A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God‚ which is supported
Premium God Universe Existence
One prime example is the worldview of H. J. McCloskey. Although I respect his worldview‚ and understand his reasoning behind it‚ I also disagree with it as well. McCloskey’s views are one of an Atheist. I am a Christian‚ and consider myself a theist who believes in an all-powerful God. The Existence of God In my opinion‚ I believe that McCloskey’s arguments against the existence of God is somewhat biased. By biased I’m inferring that his argument is a one-sided view that attempts to provide proof
Premium God Existence Atheism
important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”‚ cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil. Firstly to examine McCloskey’s work one must look at the language he uses. He refers directly to theist’s arguments as being “proofs”. He is clearly doing
Premium Cosmological argument God Causality
INTRODUCTION Australian Philosopher and atheist‚ H.J. McCloskey published an article titled “On Being an Atheist” in 1968. In this article he offers arguments and what he refers to as “proofs” that a theists’ beliefs in an omnipotent‚ omniscient God should be disregarded. McCloskey bases his article on the Cosmological argument‚ the Teleological argument‚ on the problem of evil and ends his writing discussing why he claims that being an atheist offers more comfort than a theist has from a belief
Premium God Atheism Deism
Christian Action and Values Teleological Ethics Our everyday lives are based on goals. When wake up in the morning until we go to sleep at night‚ we are always basing our days on the goals we have or have not yet accomplished. We center our decisions on the where those options will take us‚ the goods. A good is what we are all trying to receive when our goal is accomplished. Teleological ethics or teleology helps us shape our decisions everyday as well as achieve the goods we strive for in life
Premium Term Morality Peer group
On the Teleological Argument McCloskey claims that “to get the proof going‚ genuine indisputable examples of design and purpose are needed.” He is implicating that we as humans do not have the full understanding or knowledge of everything about creation. Again‚ based on anyone arguments‚ he nor I can prove God‚ no God‚ or why everything is here. Even he stated in his article that if people accept the examples of purpose and design we would only be entitled to believe that there is a “powerful” “designer
Premium Existence God Theology
the Teleological arguments The word teleological originates from the Greek ‘telos’ meaning end or purpose. It infers the existence of God from a particular aspect or character of the world‚ namely the presence of order‚ regularity and purpose‚ and thus‚ is most commonly known as the design argument; it postulates the idea of a designer for all that has been designed. As its name suggests‚ the teleological argument attempts to seek the ultimate end or purpose. Furthermore‚ the teleological argument
Premium