LIST OF CASES: 1. Davis v. Johnson‚(1978) 2 WLR 182 2. Delhi Transport Corporation v. DTC Mazdoor Cong. and Others‚ AIR 1991 SC 101 3. All India Reporter Karmachari Singh v.All India Reporter Ltd.‚ AIR 1988 SC 1325 4. Ram Manohar Lohia v.State of UP and others‚ AIR 1968‚Alld. 100 5. Ahmed Khan v. Shah bano Begum‚ (1985) SCR (3) 844 6. His Holiness Kesavnand Bharti Sripadagalvaru v. State of Kerala‚ AIR 1973 SC 1461 7. Indira Sawhney v. Union of India‚ AIR 1993 SC 477 8. Vishakha and others
Free Common law Law
|Argued December 9‚ 1952 | |Reargued December 8‚ 1953 | |Decided May 17‚ 1954 | |Full case name |Oliver Brown‚ et al. v. Board of Education of Topeka‚ et | | |al. | |Citations |347 U.S. 483 (more) | |
Premium Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court of the United States
Employment-At-Will Case Case Example A: Elaine has sued Jerry because Jerry fired her. Elaine was on the job for two months.The job offer letter that Jerry had sent her mentioned the great career opportunities at the company and stated that her annual salary would be $30‚000. The company is an employment‐at‐will employer. Elaine was given no reason for the termination. After the termination‚ Jerry hired a man named Kramer‚ who had less job experience and education than Elaine‚ for the position
Premium Employment
in her contention that nephews and nieces alone do not inherit by right of representation unless concurring with brothers or sisters of the deceased‚ as provided expressly by Art. 975. Nevertheless‚ the trial court was correct when it held that‚ in case of intestacy‚ nephews and nieces exclude all
Premium Inheritance Marriage
CASE IV 1. How would you rate President George V.Bush on the four characteristics outlined at the beginning of the case? How would you contrast his reaction to Hurricane Katrina with his reaction to the terrorist attacks of September 11‚ 2001? What do you think his handling of these two events says about his leadership? Behind Bush’s strong‚ proud appearance‚ there is a much tender‚ sensitive‚ sentimental‚ feeling person. He is probably much shyer and more private than anyone would realize from
Premium George W. Bush
to obtain regular raises and bonuses. The appellant admits that the threshold for reviewing a jury’s award is set very high‚ requiring that the verdict is so inordinately high that it must be a wholly erroneous estimate of damages. Relying on the cases of Howes v. Crosby [1984] O.J. No.3127 (C.A.) and Snushall v. Fulsang [2005] O.J. No. 4069(C.A.)‚ the appellants defined “inordinate “as too high or too low by 50%. Legal issue: Was the jury’s award for damages of $40‚000 patently excessive and
Premium Jury Law Tort
In this case study we are going to discuss the CRA case. The CRA case is mainly about the mining company breaking/dissolving the unions and making the employees sign the individual contracts. Here we will discuss and analyse how they went about pursuing the workers to leave the unions and sign the individual contracts. Before that we will briefly look into the profile of the CRA. CRA is a major Australian mining company‚ it is a large employer with about 15000 employees directly employed and another
Premium Trade union Employment Collective bargaining
Baliuag University Baliuag‚ Bulacan In partial fulfillment in the subject Tourism Sustainabilty Palanan Wilderness – Palanan‚ Isabela (Case Study Analysis) Submitted to: Ms. Michelle Mendoza Submitted by: Monica Feliza Juan Maricar Mempin Cherish Ann Veraguas Maureen Santos August 2012 Introduction Palanan is a remote 2nd class municipality in the province of Isabela‚ Philippines. According to the latest census‚ it has a population of 16‚254 people in 2‚837
Premium Indigenous peoples Philippines Indigenous peoples of the Americas
Case Name: Maryland v. King (October 2012) Facts: Maryland police arrested a man named Alonzo Jay King‚ in 2009 for first and second degree assault charges and booked into the Wicomico County‚ Maryland‚ facility‚ where booking personnel took a cheek swab (“buccal swab”) to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA collection Act. The swab was matched up to an unsolved 2003 rape case. The police had collected the 2003 DNA sample from the rape victim who underwent a sexual assault forensic exam
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Crime
Kabab-ji Restaurant Case Study How do customers judge the quality of a restaurant? 1- By friendly and pleasant staff ‚ helpful and knowledgeable people about the products and services they provide. 2- By restaurant hygienic and menu well presented 3- Freshness of the goods used by customers which served in restaurant Customer satisfaction. a. The price‚ quickness of service‚ and atmosphere of a restaurant affect restaurant customer satisfaction. In addition of that quality of both food
Free Success Failure Customer