GLENDALE CHEMICAL PRODUCTS PTY LTD v ACCC (1999) ATPR 41-672 Plaintiff: Michael Barnes Defendant/Appellant: Glendale Chemical Products Pty Ltd –Supplier of Caustic Soda which is called “DRANO” Respondent: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission Prepared By: GLENDA B. GAERLAN Presented To: PETER MCGUINNES BUSINESS LAW 1st Semester 2010 Background Facts: Michael Barnes bought a 500g of caustic soda called “DRANO” at a local store
Premium Meaning of life Law Sodium
Sprod bnf v Public Relations Oriented Security Pty Ltd[1]‚ the court of appeal was faced with complex difficulty concerning the employee’s authority either the authority of the employee is within the scope of employment or not which may resulted in vicarious liability. Material Facts The appellant‚ Mr. Sprod who was acting drunk and assaulting inside a pizza shop‚ prompted the owner of the shop to call security guards from the respondent‚ Public Relations Oriented Security Ptd Ltd. The assault
Premium Security guard Employment Acts of the Apostles
Part A (i) the fact arises on Arthur Murray(NS) Pty Ltd V FCT (1965) 114 CLR 314 is that the taxpayer sold prepaid dancing lessons with prepaid fees attributable in part to lessons to be provided in future income years. The commissioner assessed the tax payer on the basis that prepaid fees constituted income derived by the taxpayer when received. The high court concluded that amount received in respect of service to be provided in future years are not earned until the future obligations for which
Premium Tax Taxation Income tax
Evaluate and Monitor the company’s Transport Performance - inova Pharmaceuticals pty ltd. Unit: TLIL1907C/TLlL2007C Implement and Monitor Transport Logistic/Develop and Maintain Operational procedures for Transport and Logistics Enterprises- Teacher: Bob Day Prepared by: Ravisanthiran Shanmugarajah Date: 13 June 2012 To: CEO‚ inova pharmaceuticals Pty Ltd Introduction iNova Pharmaceuticals(Australia ) Pty Limited‚ develops and markets over-the-counter and prescription medicines. The product
Premium Logistics Management Transport
Belinda; Marie; Douglas Pty Ltd; Black; Brown & Co Issue 1: Does any of those parties mentioned above have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? If so‚ are they liable for a negligent misstatement for the loss of Frank and Belinda? Sub Issue 1.1: Does Marie have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? Sub Issue 1.2: Does Douglas Pty Ltd have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? Sub Issue 1.3: Does Black have a duty of care to Frank and Belinda? Sub Issue 1.4: Does Brown & Co have a duty of care to
Premium Corporation Law Common law
Bàitập 1 – Chương 1 HãyđọccácđoạntríchtrongbảnánvàxácđịnhcácnguồnluậtvàTòaánđãsửdụng Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Broderip v Salomon) Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 is a landmark1 UK company law case. The effect of the Lords ’ unanimous 2 ruling was to uphold 3firmly the doctrine4 of corporate personality‚ as set out in the Companies Act 1862‚ so that creditors of an insolvent company could not sue the company ’s shareholders
Premium Corporation
BUS 5580/5180 ORGANISATION AND MANAGEMENT Honda Motor Co. Ltd Table of Content Pages Introduction 3 Business demographics and brief history 3 Nature of the business 3 Products‚ services and target markets 3 Organizational Goals 4 Strategic goals 4 Tactical goals 4 Operational goals 4 Organization culture 4 Intrinsic aspect 4 Extrinsic aspect 5 Business Ethics and Social Responsibility
Premium Management Quality control Organizational structure
Samsung Electronics Co.‚ LTD. Matthew Werner Argosy University Online Samsung Electronics Co.‚ LTD.: Samsung Electronics Co. LTD. is a South Korean company based out of Suwon‚ South Korea. Samsung Electronics Co. LTD. is also a multinational company traded here in the U.S.A on NASDAQ daily. Although Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Is one of the many different subsidiaries and affiliated business‚ in which is united under the Samsung brand it is the flagship subsidiary of the Samsung’s Group
Premium South Korea Mobile phone Samsung Electronics
Contents I. Abstract II. Research Background and Problems Proposed III. Problems of Bicycle Industry IV. Background of BD BICYCLE CO.‚ LTD V. Organizational Structure of BD BICYCLE CO.‚ LTD VI. SWOT ANALYSIS VII. Industry Structure Analysis VIII. The Marketing Strategies IX. Conclusion X. Reference Abstract BD BICYCLE CO.‚ LTD is a private enterprise established in 1990. Although it does not have a long history or take much of the market share in the free market competition
Premium Marketing Product differentiation
Samsung Electronics Co.‚ Ltd Introduction Samsung Electronics is a flagship subsidiary of Samsung Group which focuses on electronics and information technology. Samsung Electronics holds a significant position not only in South Korea‚ but also across the world. In 2006‚ it became the world’s larger television manufacturer and the world’s largest maker of LCD panel for eight consecutive years. In 2009‚ it was the world’s largest information technology company‚ and by 2011‚ it had become the world’s
Premium Smartphone Profit margin Mobile phone