Issues and Decisions. One page send to me via e-mail as an attachement 1. Describe the common legal issue raised in the court case assigned. 2. Describe the legal basis for the court arriving at seemingly different outcomes. 3. Justify the differing outcomes as the correct outcome in the case on the basis of stare decisis (legal precedents). Goldberg V. Kelly court case is about the termination of welfare benefits to recipient without adequate notice. In 1970‚ the recipients claimed that
Premium Law United States Supreme Court of the United States
Differences between Federal and State Courts There are often good reasons to choose federal court over state court‚ or state court over federal court. Here are some of the considerations that lawyers and clients weigh when deciding one court over the other. The list is not all inclusive. Existence of Jurisdiction. Whether there is jurisdiction in either or both of the courts. Federal jurisdiction requires either a federal question and sometime a minimum dollar amount at issue or that there by
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Small Claims Courts Small Claims courts are a crucial aspect of the Canadian Legal system that could even be relevant to you one day. Small Claims courts are were created to try and give the average Joe a cheap‚ simple way to settle any type of arguments involving property or finances‚ without necessarily having to know a whole lot about law. You do not need to know many legal terms and the case usually consists of you telling your story for the judge to make a decision. It is a court that was
Premium Lawyer Dispute resolution Judge
John Marshall strengthened the power of the federal government by expanding the power of the federal judiciary. Becoming Supreme Court Justice in 1801‚ John Marshall defined the judicial branch as a power in the US government for the first time. Before this point in time the judicial branch was weak and served little purpose. The Supreme Court had little power to check and balance the legislative and executive branches as intended. Marshall’s rulings on controversial cases like Marbury v. Madison
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
Jefferson. He served until 1835 and was the forth Supreme Court Justice. His only legal schooling was six weeks attending lectures at the College of William and Mary‚ however when he took the bench in 1801‚ he changed the Judicial Branch as we know it. In fact‚ he made the branch the most powerful section of the government at that time. His most significant early case was the famous Marbury v. Madison in 1803‚ which established the right of the court to declare the actions of local‚ state or federal
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
CheckPoint: Court System Structure I The state court system and the federal court system have similar codes of conduct‚ but they do have their differences. The state court system hears way more cases than the federal courts‚ and get more personally involved due to the issues being right in their own backyard. The state of California has 58 superior courts (trial courts) which reside in each of the 58 counties. It is here where any‚ and all‚ issues pertaining to civil and criminal cases‚ as well
Premium United States Appellate court Court
Texas vs. Johnson A very controversial court case in American history was Texas vs. Johnson (1984). In 1984‚ a man named Gregory Lee Johnson followed a group of anti Reagan protesters to oppose the American exploitation of third world countries. This act of rebellion resulted in the burning of the American flag. Out of a total of approximately one hundred demonstrators who were involved in this ordeal‚ Johnson was solely charged with a crime. Johnson was arrested under Texas law‚ which made
Premium United States Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Structure of the English Court System Courts of First Instance Courts of first instance are where matters are first heard and where the FACTS of the case are determined‚ for criminal courts‚ these can either be Magistrates courts or Crown courts. All cases (even murder) are first heard in a magistrate’s court‚ and if the cases are too serious then they are transferred up to higher court (Crown Court) this is mostly indictable offenses. Magistrate courts decide whether the defendant is guilty
Premium Appeal Court Crime
Facts: Terry Hutchison was a self-employed lawyer until two years ago when he retired. He had a cash basis business for tax purposes and paid self-employment taxes on all of his income. Five years ago‚ Terry represented ABC corporation in an antitrust lawsuit against XYZ corporation and won the lawsuit. At that time‚ Terry and ABC could not agree on the
Premium United States Appeal Supreme Court of the United States
Judge Nunley held the court cases at the Robert T. Matsui Federal Courthouse‚ located at 501 I street in Sacramento‚ California. I attended the courthouse on April 6‚ 2017‚ from 1:45pm to 2:45pm in courtroom: No. 2 on the 15th floor. I attended two waivers of indictment‚ arraignment and change of plea cases. The cases involved the U.S. versus Hakob Sergoyan and the U.S. versus Stanislav Sarber. They both where tried for the same crime‚ and ended up presenting themselves to the Judge at the same time
Premium Crime Law Criminal law