The Tarasoff case is the case that “established a clinician’s duty to warn” (Mottarella‚ n.d.). Prosenjit Poddar‚ a student at University of California Berkeley (UCAL) was a patient of Dr. Lawrence Moore‚ a psychologist a hospital affiliated with UCAL. Poddar was seeking treatment for an emotional breakdown after being romantically rejected by Tatiana Tarasoff. In the course of therapy Poddar related to Dr. Moore his intent to kill Tarasoff that fall. Dr. Moore conferred with his superiors at
Premium Murder Crime Law
ACT NO. 2031 February 03‚ 1911 THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS LAW I. FORM AND INTERPRETATION Section 1. Form of negotiable instruments. - An instrument to be negotiable must conform to the following requirements: (a) It must be in writing and signed by the maker or drawer; (b) Must contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain in money; (c) Must be payable on demand‚ or at a fixed or determinable future time; (d) Must be payable to order or to bearer; and
Free Money Meaning of life Payment
as the people may think they are in increasing the autonomy of the states. The court case of medical marijuana under Chief Justice Rehnquist did not end what they called the “federalist revolution”‚ because there was none. This court case was a case that obviously had significance throughout the country as it has been a highly spoke about topic. I believe that the ruling in favor of the states was expected in this case which is why not much power was shifted from the central government to the states
Premium Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court of the United States United States Congress
convicted under the USA Patriot Act of 2003 for "furthering the aims of known terrorism organizations by advocating the violence of the United States government that is called for by those organizations." He was tried and convicted by the Federal District Court‚ and has challenged the constitutionality of this Act on the grounds that it violates his First Amendment right of Freedom of Speech as protected by the United States Constitution. The United States Patriot Act of 2003 makes it a crime to "further
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution United States United States Constitution
Creation of Negotiable Instruments (流动票据) I. Overview A negotiable instrument (also known as commercial paper) is a signed writing (or electronic record) that contains an unconditional promise (无条件承诺) or order to pay an exact amount‚ either on demand or at a specific future time. A negotiable instrument can function as a Substitute for cash or as an extension of credit. Check: Substitute for cash Promissory note (本票): Substitute for an extension of credit For a negotiable instrument to operate practically
Free Cheque Promissory note Money
when effectual; when presumed. - Every contract on a negotiable instrument is incomplete and revocable until delivery of the instrument for the purpose of giving effect thereto. As between immediate parties and as regards a remote party other than a holder in due course‚ the delivery‚ in order to be effectual‚ must be made either by or under the authority of the party making‚ drawing‚ accepting‚ or indorsing‚ as the case may be; and‚ in such case‚ the delivery may be shown to have been conditional
Premium Sign Joint and several liability Legal terms
Plessy V. Ferguson- Topics 1. An Eventful Ride 2. Free Colored People 3. The Separate Car Act 4. Plessy Case 5. The Verdict (Louisiana Supreme Court 6. Back to Ferguson’s Court An Eventful Ride On June 7‚ 1892‚ respected admired New Orleans merchant Homer Plessy‚ in his 30‚ hopped on a train at the Press Street depot in New Orleans‚ on the way to Covington‚ Louisiana‚ couple of hours away. Plessy had purchased a first-class ticket‚ and was resembling the people sitting the in
Premium Plessy v. Ferguson Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution Brown v. Board of Education
The Supreme Court uses various criteria for the consideration of cases. Not all cases may be chosen by the Supreme Court‚ so they must wisely choose their cases. The Court must be uniform and consistent with the cases they choose according to federal law. "Supreme Court Rule 17‚ Considerations Governing Review on Certiorari ’" (Rossum 28).These rules are obligatory to follow because the Court uses it to grant certiorari. There are four basic rules for Rule 17. First‚ the Supreme Court must
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Terry v. Ohio was a court decision made in 1968 that still affects how police conduct their operations to this day. This case gave special liberties to police officers which would otherwise be in conflict with the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states " the right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ house‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizure‚ shall not be violated‚ and no Warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause‚ supported by Oath or affirmation‚ and
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
appointees whose commission was not delivered‚ requested legal order from the Supreme Court that Madison deliver his commission. 1. The legal issue(s) There are three primary legal issues. (1) Is Madison entitled to receive his commission? (2) Can the requested legal order be granted by US courts? (3) Does the Supreme Court have the right to issue the delivery
Premium United States Thomas Jefferson United States Constitution