Utilitarian Analysis The Case of the Ford Pinto The Ford Pinto first rolled off the Ford Motor Co. production lines in 1971 and stayed in production in its original state until 1978. The vehicle engineers were tasked to develop the vehicle and put it into production within 25 months‚ which was nearly half the time in which the average new vehicle is put into production. The Ford engineers were aware that rear-end impact safety tests were pretty standard at the time‚ but they were not required
Premium Ford Pinto Cost-benefit analysis Utilitarianism
SCMA Ford Motor Company Case Study Contents Executive Summary 2 Issue identification with Root Cause Analysis 3 Understanding Forecasts with the new Ford 2000 Projects 3 Ford’s current supplier base is excessive 4 Purchasing structure within the Ford organization 4 Environmental Factors 5 Alternatives 6 Keep its existing supply chain 6 Recommendation 6 Create a vertically integrated supply chain based on Dell’s model 6 Create a website for direct purchases 7 A pull system should be implemented
Premium Supply chain management Supply chain
reading this case anyone would say that the ABC Auto Parts and Auto Zone Co. didn’t entered into a proper written agreement and neither of them signed any legal contract. So‚ it’s a clear indication that there no legal contract signed by both parties. Furthermore‚ a presentation by ABC of its good at Auto Zone premises and Auto Zone places an order verbally‚ it doesn’t create a valid contract when the contract amount is more than $500. So‚ if ABC brings a lawsuit against the Auto Zone than Auto Zone as
Premium
members‚ eliminating much travel that would otherwise be required to coordinate design efforts. More significantly‚ it has allowed Ford to capitalize on the expertise that in the past were concentrated on specific development centers and in different corners of the world. I. INTRODUCTION Ford Motor Company launched its globalization program in January 1994‚ called Ford 2000‚ to centralize the development of global product categories‚ which would then be customized to meet the demands of local
Premium Ford Motor Company
The Ford Pinto Case In the late 1960’s Ford Motor Company wanted to produce a small model car to compete with small Japanese and German imports like Volkswagen‚ Datsun and Toyota (Danley). In 1969 Ford’s Board approved the plan to produce the Pinto. The CEO‚ Lee Iacocca‚ wanted a car that was low weight‚ under 2‚000 pounds‚ and low cost‚ under $2‚000. Lee “Iaccoca imposed the 2000/2000 rule‚ i.e.‚ the Pinto could weigh no more than 2000 pounds and cost no more than $2000” (Danley). The engineers
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Ford Mustang
Ford Motor Company and Toyota Case Work Ch. 3 Step 1. Structure the audit problem: In the first step‚ we consider the relevant parties involved; identify the alternatives‚ risks and uncertainties; how to evaluate them and how to structure the problem. The parties are the Ford Motor Company‚ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and lastly the Audit Committee. The problem that may arise is that Ford Motor company has PricewaterhouseCoopers audit and prepare essentially all of the company’s financials for
Premium Ford Motor Company Auditing Audit
– Business Ethics & Social Responsibility | Jan Ruder‚ Ph.D. November 11‚ 2007 2. It’s 1973 and I am the Recall Coordinator for Ford Motor Company. Field reports are coming in reporting the following: Rear-end collisions‚ Fires‚ and Fatalities. I must decide whether to recall the Pinto. (Case: Pinto Fires‚ Trevino & Nelson‚ p. 115) 3. Before the Pinto‚ Ford was immersed in an intense‚ internal struggle between “Bunky” Knudson and Lee Iacocca over the company’s product line. ● Major pressure
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Ford Mustang
Running head: FORD PINTO CASE (Newton‚ Ford‚ 2007‚ p. 1)Ford Pinto Case External social pressures play a big part in the decision reached about the Ford Motor Company. When you have highly respected individuals such as retired NASA engineer Dr. Leslie Ball say “The release to production of the Pinto was the most reprehensible decision in the history of American Engineering” (Newton‚ Ford‚ 2007‚ p. 1); there is cause for concern. There would be more
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Station wagon
The Ford Pinto was a subcompact vehicle that Ford Motor Company manufactured from 1970- 1980. The Pinto caught on with consumers‚ and sales of the vehicle were high. However‚ serious problems quickly arose regarding the design of the Pinto. The gas tank on the vehicles was placed directly behind the rear axle instead of above it‚ with only nine inches of space between the gas tank and axle. Bolts were also placed close to the gas tank‚ increasing the risk that they could puncture the tank in an accident
Premium Ford Pinto
CASE STUDY #2 FORD MOTOR COMPANY by A Ford Motor Company - Supply Chain Strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I. Executive Summary Part II. Issues Identification Part III. Alternative Options Part IV. Recommendation Part V. Implementation Part VI. Conclusion
Premium Supply chain management Ford Motor Company Supply chain