Indecisive disobedience occurs when the individuals in the experiment try to disobey in different ways‚ but they were ineffective at it. I believe that the Milgram experiment was more about indecisive disobedience‚ rather than destructive obedience. The subjects of Milgram’s experiment were consciously aware that what they were doing was wrong‚ since it brought great pain to the “learner‚” but because they were instructed by a legitimate authority to continue the experience‚ they obeyed the experimenter
Premium
ethical cost can mean a cost to an individual taking part in research. Examples of this include Milgrams study on obedience. There was a number of ethical costs within Milgrams research‚ for instance one major ethical cost within Milgrams research is that he failed to protect his participants from both physical and psychological harm. Milgram failed to do so as the participants that took part within Milgrams study experiences severe amounts of physical and psychological harm; two of which had seizures
Free Ethics Psychology Stanford prison experiment
encourage the participants to continue with the experiment. After the experiment had been done the participants were fully interrogated on what Milgram’s true intention was and followed up a year later to check on their psychological states. Milgram remarkably found that 100% of the participants administered electric shocks that were up to 300 volts. Before performing the experiment a guess was made by top psychologists that only 1% of the participants would have done this‚ and the 1% would’ve
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Social psychology
1. Introduction 1. We are social animals. 2. We are moved to love and to hate‚ drastically. 3. We almost always care what others think or what others do or say. 4. Social psychology is the study of how we think about‚ influence‚ and relate to others. 2. Attributing behavior to persons or to situations 1. Fritz Heider came up with the attribution theory which says people measure others’ behavior by either their internal disposition or the external situation that they’re in. 1. In other words
Premium Milgram experiment Social psychology Stanford prison experiment
“Is research into conformity and obedience worthwhile? Showing you have considered both points of view” Conformity is the ‘tendency for people to adapt the behaviour‚ attitudes and values of a reference group’. However‚ obedience is a type of social influence whereby somebody acts in response to a direct order from a figure with perceived authority. There is also the implication that the person receiving the order is made to respond in a way that they would not have otherwise have done without the
Premium Milgram experiment Ethics Conformity
the men obey the authority figure by doing cruel things they would not usually do. These experiments turn mentally stable men into a person willing to inflict harsh punishments on innocent people while following orders. Night by Elie Wiesel‚ The Milgram Shock Experiment‚ and the stanford prison experiment shows how obedience to an authority can cause people to stray from their conscience. In the Stanford Prison experiment the men were deindividualized from the start of the experiment. The men obeyed
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Prison
social influence (e.g.‚ Asch‚ 1952; Milgram‚ 1974; Zimbardo‚ 1971) tell us about group effects on individual behaviour? Social influence is the effect one person or a group has on the attitudes or behaviour of another. There are several different kinds of social influence. This essay the focuses on conformity - yielding publicly to group pressure‚ and sometimes yielding privately also (e.g. Asch (1951)); also on obedience – behaving as instructed‚ for example Milgram (1974). Studies of these kinds
Premium Milgram experiment Social psychology Stanford prison experiment
illustrates that he only did what he did‚ followed orders‚ because he was told to and he felt like an agent to Adolf Hitler. Milgram also posed the idea of something called moral strain. This is when you obey an order although it goes against your morals‚ you feel that what you are doing is wrong but you have no choice. An example of this is in the study of obedience carried out by Milgram. The participants objected to shocking learners by saying that they wouldn’t do it and consistently standing up to avoid
Premium Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler Adolf Eichmann
Milgram (1963) vs. Meeus and Raaijmakers (1985) (12 marks) The aim of both studies was to test obedience. Meeus and Raaijmakers were testing psychological violence‚ where Milgram was testing physical violence. The procedure was similar‚ as in both experiments the participants were paid volunteers and had to give an increasing punishment. The Dutch experiment was conducted in a natural experiment though and and Milgram’s one - in a university. The results of both studies support each other’s
Premium Experiment
culture‚ emotion‚ values and ethics in the individual decision process‚ we will examine other variables including conformity‚ group think‚ culture‚ and emotions in relation to the group decision process. We used three experiments‚ Stanford‚ Asch and Milgram to illustrate other variables that contributes to individual and group decision making. Autocratic leadership V democratic leadership Autocratic Autocratic leaders create a strict division between superiors and those
Premium Decision making Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment