culture‚ emotion‚ values and ethics in the individual decision process‚ we will examine other variables including conformity‚ group think‚ culture‚ and emotions in relation to the group decision process. We used three experiments‚ Stanford‚ Asch and Milgram to illustrate other variables that contributes to individual and group decision making. Autocratic leadership V democratic leadership Autocratic Autocratic leaders create a strict division between superiors and those
Premium Decision making Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
One of them being Milgram’s study of obedience. Milgram wanted to see whether people would still obey a legitimate authority‚ even if they knew the task they were doing was morally wrong. Milgram told the participants that they were investigating whether punishment had an effect on learning. He hired two confederates‚ one of them being the ‘experimenter’ and the other one
Premium Sociology Psychology Social psychology
Babbie‚ p. 43. 2009).” The experiment took on an exploratory design‚ which indicates the specific problem had not been clearly defined (Maxfield & Babbie‚ 2009). Zimbardo himself could only compare experiments of this nature to his high school friend‚ Milgram who conducted research on obedience to authority figures as related to the Holocaust. Exploratory research is begun to explore an issued regarding society to answer of the questions needed to conduct further studies. To this date the Stanford Prison
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment
No. 4 (Dec.‚ 1969)‚ pp. 365-380‚ Published by: American Sociological Association. Asch‚ S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Source: Psychological Monographs‚ 70. (Whole No. 416). Milgram‚ S. (1974). Obedience to authority‚ pp. 19‚ 35-49‚ 141-171. Published by Harper & Row. Fraser‚ C.‚ Burchell‚ B.‚ Hay‚ D. and Duveen‚ G (2001). Introducing social psychology‚ chapter 8. Published by Polity Press.
Premium Social psychology Conformity Psychology
Obedience In this essay I am going to write on how obedience can affect individuals on how they would normally behave and integrate in society. The meaning of Obedience is a form of social influence where an individual acts in response to a direct order from another individual‚ who is usually an authority figure. It is assumed that without such an order the person would not have acted in this way. (McLeod‚ 2007) Migram (1963) conducted a study on how obedient a person would be to an authority
Premium Stanford prison experiment Social psychology Psychology
think what was ethical in the experiment was the teachers obey the authority of the experimenter. Also‚ deception‚ the participants actually believed they were shocking a real person and were unaware the learner was a confederate of Milgram’s. Also Milgram interviews the participants to find out the effect of the experiment afterward‚ and some of them glad to be a part of the experiment and some wished they weren’t
Premium Education Teacher Psychology
! ! ! ! ! AS PSYCHOLOGY UNIT 2 (PSYA2) ! SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY: Social Influence 2014-2015 ! ! ! ! ! ! Name: …………………………………………………… Unit 2 – Social Psychology – Social Influence Alton College (Updated Sept 2013) ! THE SPECIFICATION What you need to know: ! Social Influence • Conformity (majority influence) and explanations of why people conform‚ including informational social influence and normative social influence. • Types of conformity‚ including internalisation and compliance. • Obedience
Free Social psychology Sociology Milgram experiment
issue when performing social research? Describe the importance of no harm to participants as an ethical issue. Give examples to illustrate the difficulties with this issue. Examples from the book that had difficulties with ethics include the Milgram experiment‚ the Stanford Prison experiment‚ and the syphilis experiment. These experiments were done in the name of science but had a lasting impact on the participants. In the listed examples‚ the institutions that sponsored these experiments
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
time‚ he simply did it (Wiesel 97). In the Perils of Obedience‚ the subject‚ Prozi‚ first “[refused] to take the responsibility” because the subject was in there “hollering” (Milgram 23). Immediately after the Experimenter said that he was “responsible for anything that happens to him”‚ the Prozi simply said “all right” (Milgram 23). This proves that the majority of people in a difficult situation will simply wait for somebody else to take responsibility for any wrong doings‚ or lack of action at all
Premium Person Psychology Bystander effect
ideas to... Premium * Past Paper Past Paper Questions Theme 1- The Indigenous Peoples and the Europeans 1. Read the passage below‚ and answer the questions that follow. The Taino (Arawak) and... Premium * Milgram Past Paper Milgram (1963) Past-paper Questions 1. In the Milgram study on obedience‚ the subjects were observed to show a lot of tension... Premium * Past Paper Of F3 removed from the examination hall. The Association of Chartered Certified Accountants Paper F3 (INT) ALL
Premium General Certificate of Secondary Education Paper Association of Chartered Certified Accountants