WRITING CASENOTES Essentially‚ a casenote is a summary of a case. Christopher Enright‚[1] as outlined below‚ suggests the type of information that should be included in any case summary. You may wish to use these points as a guide to writing your own casenote: • Formal particulars‚ including: o The name and citation of the case (ie Mabo v Queensland (No.2) (1992) 175 CLR 1)‚ o Name of the court and judge(s)‚ o Name and status of each party‚ and
Premium Common law Ratio decidendi Law
For the exclusive use of X. LIU CASE: A-165 DATE: 09/00 (REV’D. 05/07) SEARS: ACCOUNTING FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS Sarah Simons picked up the 1999 Annual Report for Sears‚ Roebuck and Co.‚ which had just been delivered to her office. As an analyst for a major brokerage‚ she was responsible for providing investment advice regarding companies in the retail industry‚ including Sears. She looked over the income statement‚ noting that net income grew by 39 percent over the previous year‚
Premium Balance sheet Asset
Page 1 All ER Reprints/[1914-15] All ER Rep /Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep Breeders ’ Association and another - [1914-15] All ER Rep 900 Hickman v Kent or Romney Marsh Sheep Breeders ’ Association and another [1914-15] All ER Rep 900 Also reported [1915] 1 Ch 881; 84 LJ Ch 688; 113 LT 159; 59 Sol Jo 478 CHANCERY DIVISION ASTBURY J 4‚ 25 MARCH 1915 31 MARCH 1915 Arbitration - Submission - Article of company - Application for membership of company and acceptance Rule for all disputes
Premium Contract
The interesting events from CoBot’s standpoint are those‚ which were not expected or least expected to happen‚ from the CoBot’s past task execution data. We define these interesting events as anomalies-- deviation from the expected data. The expected value for an event can be computed from the respective log table‚ we create by analyzing the bag files. Using the expected data we identify the instances which are anomalies‚ and verbalize them comparing it with a past instance or the expected data for
Premium Management Data mining Scientific method
of her customers and understanding of the music industry. Leveraging competences‚ addressing weaknesses. Madonna has an ability to acknowledge her own competences and weaknesses. Very early in her career Madonna realised that neither her dancing nor voice were strong enough on their own‚ so she teamed up with people who could help her (for example‚ M.Jackson’s manager). Consistent implementation. Continuous renewal. Madonna’s consistent change of style and music demonstrate her awareness
Premium Physical attractiveness Success Management
Alex Sander’s Organizational Behavior Review Page 1 Alex Sander’s Organizational Behavior Review: A Brief Case Analysis Oakley Tyler Business 305-02 Professor Pratt October 9‚ 2008 Alex Sander’s Organizational Behavior Review Page 2 Alex Sander is the project manager at Landon Care Products‚ Inc. Alex is smart. Alex is self-driven. Alex is an asset to his company in that he makes intelligent decisions‚ faces challenges straight on‚ and confidently
Premium Emotion Emotional intelligence Psychology
Textron Case 1) How does Textron make money? Textron is able to make money as a result of 4 defining aspects of its business model: a. Textron is a conglomerate: by purchasing a variety of companies‚ Textron is able to share technology between its business units thus increasing its competitive advantage in these respective units. For instance‚ lessons learned in aerodynamics at Bell Helicopters can be used in the construction of aircraft at Cessna. Additionally‚ because of Textron ’s
Premium Inventory Asset FIFO and LIFO accounting
Malayan Law Journal Reports/1966/Volume 2/STEPHEN KALONG NINGKAN v TUN ABANG HAJI OPENG AND TAWI SLI - [1966] 2 MLJ 187 - 7 September 1966 8 pages [1966] 2 MLJ 187 STEPHEN KALONG NINGKAN v TUN ABANG HAJI OPENG AND TAWI SLI OCJ HARLEY AGCJ (BORNEO) KUCHING CIVIL SUIT NO K 45 OF 1966 7 September 1966 Constitutional Law -- Constitution of the State of Sarawak‚ Articles 1‚ 5‚ 6‚ 7‚ 10‚ 24 and 44 -- Whether Governor has power to dismiss Chief Minister -- Allegation that Chief Minister
Premium Constitution United States Constitution Prime minister
Court Case Project Dredd Scott v. Sandford 1857 In the Dred Scott case‚ Scott filed for a lawsuit to gain freedom for him and his family. He was once obtained a slave in a slave state‚ but his master had moved around and ended up in Illinois‚ which had been a free state in 1836. His rights that were being withheld from him were freedom. The way they pleaded their case was that he lived in a territory where slavery was illegal; therefore he can’t be enslaved again. Scott lost the case‚ Taney
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Patents Wheatley v Drillsafe Ltd. (2001) Wheatley v Drillsafe Ltd. Facts: Wheatley (W)‚ the proprietor and licensee of a European patent relating to a threaded hole cutting device‚ appealed against a decision holding that the patent was invalid on the ground of common general knowledge and accordingly should be revoked‚ and also that‚ in any event‚ there had been no infringement of the patent by Drillsafe (D) and others. Contentions: D maintained‚ inter alia‚ that its use of a semi-penetrating
Premium Patent Patent application