Salazar‚ Kristine Kim B. 4-DLM 1. Arturo Tolentino vs Secretary of Finance FACTS: Tolentino et al is questioning the constitutionality of RA 7716 otherwise known as the Expanded Value Added Tax (EVAT) Law. Tolentino averred that this revenue bill did not exclusively originate from the House of Representatives as required by Section 24‚ Article 6 of the Constitution. Even though RA 7716 originated as HB 11197 and that it passed the 3 readings in the HoR‚ the same did not complete the 3 readings
Premium Tax Value added tax Indirect tax
CASE DIGEST CASE #1: Kuroda v. Jalandoni 83 Phil 171 • FACTS: - Shigenori Kuroda‚ former Lieutenant-General of the Japanese Imperial Forces of the Philippines‚ was charged before a Military Commission in violation of the laws and customs of war. The Petitioner seeks to establish the illegality of Executive Order No. 68 of the President of the Philippines; to enjoin and prohibit two US prosecutors from participating in the prosecution of the petitioner’s case; and to permanently
Premium Law Human rights United States Constitution
(1) G.R. No. 169144 IN RE: IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION TO APPROVE THE WILL OF RUPERTA PALAGANAS WITH PRAYER FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR‚ MANUEL MIGUEL PALAGANAS and BENJAMIN GREGORIO PALAGANAS‚ petitioners‚ vs. ERNESTO PALAGANAS‚ respondent. January 26‚ 2011 ABAD‚ J.: FACTS: Ruperta C. Palaganas (Ruperta)‚ a Filipino who became a naturalized United States (U.S.) citizen in 2001‚ died single and childless. In the last will and testament she executed in California‚ she designated
Premium Estate Inheritance Legal terms
GUANZON‚ Aldrin James L. PA 122 REGALA‚ Marc Daniel d. J. Hilda G. Diokno Lademora‚ Carl C. vs. CSC‚ Feb‚ 05‚ 2007 Facts: On February 3‚ 2006 petitioner‚ the duly elected Mayor of San Francisco‚ Agusan Del Sur‚ filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the invalidation of the approval of the temporary appointment of Daligdig with the CSC-CARAGA‚ where the case contains the following relevant portions: a) On July 5‚ 2005 Mayor Lademora appointed‚ Gil A. Daligdig as Municipal
Premium Municipality Mexico City Local government
G.R. No. L-42091 November 2‚ 1935 GONZALO CHUA GUAN‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ vs. SAMAHANG MAGSASAKA‚ INC.‚ and SIMPLICIO OCAMPO‚ ADRIANO G. SOTTO‚ and EMILIO VERGARA‚ as president‚ secretary and treasurer respectively of the same‚ defendants-appellees. Facts: 1. Gonzalo Toco‚ the owner of the 5‚894 shares of capital stock mortgaged these shares to Chua Chiu to guarantee the payment of debt of 20‚000. -These shares were represented by 9 certificates; having a par value of P5 per share
Premium Mortgage Debt Stock
1. Ladera v. Hodges G.R. No. 8027-R‚ September 23‚ 1952‚ Vol. 48‚ No. 12‚ Official Gazette 5374Reyes‚J.B.L.‚ J. FACTS: Paz G. Ladera entered into a contract with C.N. Hodges. Hodges promised to sell a lot with an area of 278square meters to Ladera‚ subject to certain terms and conditions. The agreement called for a downpayment of P 800.00 and monthly installments of P 5.00 each with interest of 1% per month‚ until P2‚085 is paid in full. Incase of failure of the purchaser to make any monthly
Premium Real property Property Personal property
♥ ILOVEYOU ♥ Oria Vs McMicking Source: www.lawphil.net Art. 1387. All contracts by virtue of which the debtor alienates property by gratuitous title are presumed to have been entered into in fraud of creditors‚ when the donor did not reserve sufficient property to pay all debts contracted before the donation. FACTS Gutierrez Hermanos filed an action for recovery of a sum of money against Oria Hermanos & Co. and herein plaintiff filed an action for recovery also for the same defendant
Premium Contract Supreme Court of the United States Plaintiff
Cyruz P. Tuppal 2011-0134 Case Title: STARLITE VS NLRC G.R. No.: G.R. No. 78491 Date: March 16‚ 1989 Petitioner: Starlite Plastic Industrial Corporation Respondent: National Labor Relations Commission and Edgar Gomez Ponente: J. Cortes Facts: Private respondent GOMEZ was employed as a factory worker by STARLITE sometime in March 1981. On 22 June 1984‚ STARLITE dismissed him on the ground that he was caught attempting to steal one ballast costing P80.00. STARLITE reported
Premium Employment 1984 Prima facie
Dy Keh Beng -vs- International Labor and Maritime Union of the Philippines‚ et al. GR No. L-32245‚ 25 May 1979 FACTS A charge for ULP was filed against Dy Keh beng for discriminatory acts within the meaning of RA 875‚ Section 4(a.1) and 4(a.2) by dismissing Carlos N. Solano and Ricardo Tudla for their union activities. A case was filed in court and Dy Keh Beng contended that he did not know Tudla and that Solano was not his employee because the latter came to the establishment only when there
Premium Existence The Establishment Ontology
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC G.R. No. L-12342 August 3‚ 1918 A.A. ADDISON‚ plaintiff-appellant‚ Vs. MARCIANA FELIX and BALBINO TIOCO‚ defendants-appellees. FACTS: By a public instrument dated June 11‚ 1914 plaintiff Addison sold to the defendant Marciana Felix and husband Balbino Tioco‚ 4 parcels of land. Defendants paid‚ at the time of the execution of the deed‚ the sum of P3‚000.00 on account of the purchase price‚ and bound herself to pay the remainder in installments
Premium Legal terms Property law Contract