Ocean Carriers Case Ocean Carriers uses a 9% discount rate. 1. Do you expect daily spot rate to increase or decrease next year? Daily spot rates are expected to decrease next year because 63 new vessels are scheduled for delivery over the next year and imports of ore and coal would most likely remain stagnant over the next two years. Imports of iron ore and coal and the number of vessels available are two big factors of spot rates. 2. What factors drive average daily hire rates?
Premium International trade Net present value Cargo ship
REPORT ON CAPESIZE PURCHASE FOR OCEAN CARRIERS Introduction The purpose of this report is to evaluate whether Ocean Carriers Inc. should immediately commission a new capesize carrier that would cost $39 million‚ and would be completed two years hence‚ in order to finalize a lease of the ship for a three-year period with a potential charterer in very good faith. The contrasting tax regulations between the two countries where the company locates its office‚ and the different cost-benefit circumstances
Premium Net present value
Case Study 1 – Ocean Carriers 1. The Capital Budgeting Decision Should Ms. Linn purchase the Capesize vessel? Assume that Ocean Carriers is a U.S. firm and is subject to 35% taxation. (Please see excel sheets) From our analysis it appears that Ms. Linn should not buy the Capesize vessel. The Net Present Value on the Ocean Carrier is not a positive number‚ a clear indicator that buying the vessels is not a good idea. The tax rate of 35% makes a lot of difference in determining this NPV
Premium Net present value
(a) Statement of Problem. Ocean Carriers is evaluating a proposed three year lease of a ship. Currently‚ no ships in Ocean Carrier’s fleet meet the requirements of the customer. Since the new ship requires an investment of $39 million‚ Mary Linn‚ the Vice President of Finance for Ocean Carriers‚ needs to evaluate the proposal’s NPV and determine whether or not to accept the proposal by considering expected cash flows‚ tax implications‚ and future market conditions. (b) Statement
Premium Supply and demand
Porter’s 5 forces analysis Potential entrants (threat) Samsung as mobile company is not even frightened of new entrants‚ because the capital needed to invest in this kind of industry is extremely high‚ which means that no too many investors try to gain a market share in mobile environment. BIBLIOGRAPHY \l 2058 This kind of threat is very low‚ with a high invest in R&D for the creation and innovation of unique products that exceed the consumer’s expectations and brand loyalty of their mobile
Premium Mobile phone Smartphone Motorola
Samsung Tactical objectives: Samsung is guided by a singular vision: to lead the digital convergence movement. We believe that through technology innovation today‚ we will find the solutions we need to address the challenges of tomorrow. From technology comes opportunity—for businesses to grow‚ for citizens in emerging markets to prosper by tapping into the digital economy‚ and for people to invent new possibilities. It’s our aim to develop innovative technologies and efficient processes that
Premium Dog
superiority of Samsung over its competitors exceeded 51 per cent! The cost advantages related to raw materials may be explained by better negotiated agreements with suppliers (perhaps due to the larger volumes of purchases – comp. Fig. 5) and possibly less shipping and distribution costs that stem from the fact that Samsung’s fab facilities are geographically collocated (while competitors’ facilities are spread world-wide). In terms of labour productivity only Chinese SMIC outperformed Samsung‚ but that
Premium Cost Costs China
Final Report Consumer Decision Making Process‚ Perception and Reference Group in Purchasing Samsung Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 Prepared for Prof. Val. Ortega by: Kam Kai Heng (12717040) Satrio Adi Bintoro (12525545) 13 September 2012
Premium Decision making Decision theory Apple Inc.
Class Discussion of Samsung and Theme Park Industry Case Reading: Case: Samsung Case. Key activities of the class: 1. Group presentations of the industry analysis (3 minutes per group; use the worksheet) 2. Class discussion of the Case: Key issue: As the chairperson of the Samsung Group‚ would you approve the master plan proposed? (Please refer to Case Summary on Web). 3. Video: Samsung Everland Fall 2000 MGTO321 (L1 & L2) -- Dr. JT Li 1 Outline of Class Discussion: Samsung Case 1. Global Context:
Premium Management Samsung Group Strategic management
context organizations need to dig novel approaches to retain the most effective manpower. Looking carefully into many organizations-Retention strategies are very competitive‚ Companies try to provide their best to retain the employees of their competitors. In this conceptual paper the author has attempted to bring out employee retention approaches‚ strategies for knowledge workforce‚ for achieving competitive advantage. Need to address Employee Retention: Organizations have to bear massive costs
Premium Talent management Employment Costs