AP Language and Composition Prompts (1981 to 2012) YEAR Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 1981 The Rattler”- analyze effect on reader – consider organization‚ point of view‚ language‚ detail. George Bernard Shaw letter – describe writer’s attitude toward mother & her cremation – diction and detail Thomas Szasz – argue for or against his position on the struggle for definition. Use readings‚ study‚ or experience. 1982 A reading on happiness – summarize his reasons for his opinion and explain why
Premium Rhetoric Rhetorical device Rhetorical techniques
Activity-Based Costing ABC Company produces two products: Product A and Product B. Recently appointed management decided to change from a unit-based‚ traditional costing system to an activity-based costing system. The following data have been gathered‚ to assess the effect of the change: Product type Quantity Prime Costs Machine Hours Material Moves Setups Product A 60‚000 €150‚000 3‚500 6‚800 800 Product B 15‚000 € 30‚000 2‚750 1‚200 450 Expenditures (€) €180‚000 €120‚000
Premium Cost Costs Cost accounting
Historical Development of Marginal Costing Marginal cost is the change in the total cost that arises when the quantity produced has an increment by unit. That is‚ it is the cost of producing one more unit of a good. In general terms‚ marginal cost at each level of production includes any additional costs required to produce the next unit. The concept of marginal utility grew out of attempts by economists to explain the determination of price. The term “marginal utility”‚ credited to the Austrian
Premium Costs Variable cost Marginal cost
TRADITIONAL ARBSORPTION COSTING STATEMENT DETAILS COST PER SYSTEM Systems Mist cooling Water mist OAR $1500/hrs Variable cost $ 1 450‚00 $ 1 254‚00 Fixed Overhead cost $ 4 500‚00 $ 5 400‚00 Total unit cost $ 5 950‚00 $ 6 654‚00 Traditional Absorption
Premium Costs Cost Cost accounting
Article 32 TARGET COSTING FOR NEW-PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PRODUCTLEVEL TARGET COSTING Robin Cooper and Regine Slagmulder Editors’ Note: This article is an updated synthesis of in-depth explorations contained in Target Costing and Value Engineering‚ by Robin Cooper and Regine Slagmulder (Portland‚ Oregon: Productivity Press‚ 1997). Part two of the series discusses product-level target costing; part three‚ to be featured in an upcoming issue‚ will address component-level target costing. tomers. Consequently
Premium Cost Costs Cost accounting
advantages of an Activity Based Costing System: The first and most important advantage is the accuracy in the process of costing with regards to the product line‚ the end-users of the product‚ the stock-keeping units employed by the management and the channel and category which streamline the flow of the product from the producer to the end user. This system better assists in the process of understanding the concept of overheadcosts i.e. the allocation of common business resources as they are used
Premium Costs Cost Marginal cost
Standard Costing 4 Disadvantage of Standard Cost 4 Advantage and benefits of Standard Costing 5 & 6 The relevance of standard in Brittan and rest of the world 6 Overhead 7 Conclusion 8 Reference and Bibliography 9 Introduction This report is based on the relevance of standard costing in Modern Britain‚ the report will include so fact and evidence that standard costing is
Premium Cost accounting Costs Management accounting
Kaizen Costing A Report Kaizen Costing The ultimate objective of manufacturing industries today is to increase productivity through system simplification‚ organizational potential and incremental improvements by using modern techniques like Kaizen. Most of the manufacturing industries are currently encountering a necessity to respond to rapidly changing customer needs‚ desires and tastes. For industries‚ to remain competitive and retain market share in this global market‚ continuous improvement
Premium Manufacturing Kaizen Cost
purpose of this report is to present and analyse a new costing system proposed by Mr. Jan Lorson for the valve department of the company‚ and compare it to the existing system‚ in order to judge whether to go forward with its implementation. The analysis uses a number of examples to highlight the significant differences in costs between the two systems‚ and the impact that these variances have on the business. It is concluded that the new system does provide a definite improvement over the existing
Premium Cost Costs
Product costing assignment 1. (a) Split into fixed costs and variable costs‚ which are both allocated based on machine hours‚ but using separate rates. Also‚ make a distinction between the costs that are more directly related to the machines (e.g.‚ depreciation‚ electricity) and those that have been allocated to the machines from other cost centers. (b) Split total machine-related costs into three types: costs related to setup‚ production‚ and maintenance of the machines. For each type of
Premium Cost Costs Variable cost