Capital Punishment is a highly controversial and emotional subject in which most people seem to have strong opinions. The debate is by no means new‚ however‚ in my opinion‚ the death penalty is cruel and inhumane. During biblical time‚ capital punishment has been an issue. In writing this paper‚ I intend to argue the topic from a utliitarian point of view using Rawls Priciple of Justice. Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that theoutcomes as
Premium Capital punishment Murder Prison
forth must not be overridden for fear of both corporeal and mental punishment. Such responsibilities tie friends together and split enemies. Moral obligations can even be taken to the extreme of ending another’s life for the common welfare of a society. In Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment‚ Raskolnikov‚ the protagonist‚ bears a moral rationale that leads him to murder Alyona Ivanovna‚ a harsh pawbroker. Through analytical
Premium Morality Ethics Murder
popular in Russia in the 1860’s- utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a philosophy defined as the idea of the moral worth of an action is determined only by the contribution to the overall utility‚ the contribution of happiness or pleasure among all people. Meaning‚ the moral worth of an action is solely determined by its outcome. Moral choices and ethical dilemmas are discussed in Russian literature during the 19th century such as Fyodor Dostoevsky’s‚ Crime and Punishment. The story follows the protagonist
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Hedonism
set of rules and use positive comments as a reward for favored behavior. Children are then also met with the consequences of not following these commands. Eventually‚ individuals learn that breaking regulations and acting wrongfully results in punishment. To most people‚ the idea of following the laws and the moral code of society is an accepted expectation in everyday life. Although personal definitions of “morality” and one’s established guide for behavior differs between individuals‚ abiding
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
Utilitarianism vs. Individualism Arguments for utilitarianism and individualism will never end. The essence of utilitarianism‚ pleasure is the chief end of life and the greatest happiness for the greatest number should be the ultimate goal of human beings‚ has always been a crucial matter of concern and controversy. It is regarded as an exploit of people’s freedom and individualism. However‚ individualism is deemed as an ignorance of teamwork. We cannot simply tell which one is superior to the
Premium Utilitarianism
The term proportional retributivism presents the idea that criminals are given punishments that are similar to what they have done. Despite that‚ the idea of retribution is a substitute for revenge and such a negative outlook shouldn’t be the rational response for a very critical situation. Deciding to kill someone who has killed someone of value to you only follows a continuous cycle of bitter frustration and violence which only negatively impacts all parties. Execution doesn’t lead to closure but
Premium Crime Capital punishment Criminal justice
ABSTRACT Utilitarianism is a normative ethical theory originally established by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that advocates brining about good consequences or happiness to all concerned. Kantianism is the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Kantianism is another famous rule of the nonconsequentialist theory. Kant’s theory contains several ethical principles. These principles are the good will‚ establishing morality by reasoning alone‚ categorical imperative‚ duty rather than inclination‚ and summary
Premium Ethics Immanuel Kant Morality
DEONTOLOGY vs UTILITARIANISM The theory of deontology is derived from the writings of German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Kant stated that a universal law should provide the basis for each act‚ and that the intention was of more importance than the result. Deontology is a duty-based ethical position‚ where one ’s actions are based on what is ethically correct‚ regardless of the consequences (Porche‚ 2004). Deontological theories hold that actions are morally right
Premium Immanuel Kant Ethics
have some key concepts which point to what the good ultimately is: egoism‚ utilitarianism‚ and deontology. Egoism values the desires of the individual the most‚ and this is most important to the individual. Utilitarianism‚ on the other hand‚ needs to be impartial in order to value each individual’s happiness equally. Deontology also conflicts with both of these other theories because it is not consequentialist like utilitarianism‚ and does not always benefit the individual or anyone else involved. The
Premium Ethics Ethical egoism Utilitarianism
Deontology Deontology steps in where utilitarianism fails‚ utilitarianism fails in the idea that there are absolutely morally forbidden actions. But‚ in reality‚ even the worst actions are not always wrong‚ given extreme circumstances. Deontology is all about duty and moral laws. For instance‚ if a person does a good act‚ and it has a good outcome‚ from a utilitarianistic view‚ this person was right. However‚ in deontological view‚ this person is only right if the decision was made or action
Premium