Animals have been around for more than a million years and each kind of animal is beautiful and important to contributing to the world. People question the existence of animals. Some say they were created to be companions for man and others conclude them as sacrifices for nourishment. However‚ nowhere does it state that animals were created for experimentation. Nowhere does it say it’s okay to make animals suffer for the purpose of cosmetics‚ drugs‚ or household cleaners. Experimentation on animals
Premium Science Experiment Mammal
Animal Rights- Ban Testing Ally Torres English 10 April 25‚ 2012 Mr. Bannon Animals are unique creatures placed all around the world‚ each with their own genuine‚ exotic‚ and weird personalities. Unfortunately‚ every year‚ “scientists” use them to test potentially dangerous products that most people use in our everyday lives. Although scientists claim that there is no other way to test them‚ and that their work ethics are a necessity to keep the society safe‚ they are wrong. There are many
Premium Animal testing The Animals Animal rights
When it comes to the topic of animal testing‚ most of us will readily agree that it is a debatable topic. Where this argument usually ends‚ however‚ is on the conversation if animal testing is necessary. Whereas some are convinced that using animals for testing has contributed to many lifesaving cures and treatments‚ others maintain that these animals are very different from humans and‚ therefore‚ make poor test subjects. My own view is these animals have produced many treatments‚ but not outcomes
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
Yes we need to test our drugs and surgical stuff on something so that humans do not have to suffer but the way that they are killed is inhumane and wrong. Pigs have done nothing to deserve to die and suffer for our own selfish needs. I believe it is inhumane to kill them and use them the way that we do and we should find another way to test on them. Even though we need to test on something to help us. I think there should be another way to make this happen rather than kill them and watch them
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Testing cosmetics on animals
Animal Testing Since 2002‚ over 1 million animals that the USDA collects numbers on‚ which includes dogs‚ cats‚ sheep‚ hamsters‚ guinea pigs‚ and primates‚ have been tested on. Since then‚ that number has increased to approximately 1.4 million. This excludes all rats and hamsters used in testing‚ which normally make up 90% of testing. This percentage‚ however‚ remains only as an estimate because US laws do not require scientists to record how many rats‚ birds‚ and mice are used. Cages for theses
Premium Animal rights Pain Suffering
review of your personal interests‚ experiences and knowledge. Also‚ consider the audience’s knowledge and their need to know. Although you may include personal insight‚ your speech content must primarily be based on professional‚ credible research. With your research in hand‚
Premium Rhetoric Speech Audience
million animals are killed in lab for product testing. Now a days‚ scientists are using animals for their research and testings‚ and I disagree with the use of animals. It is unfair to animals because in the end it kills them‚ it may not actually work on humans‚ and the cost of it. I am against the use of animals for product testing for a lot of reasons. I am against using animals because I think it is cruel to animals because if it a test went wrong then then it could cause a harmless animal to
Premium Science The Animals Animal
Animal abuse is defined as the human infliction of suffering or harm upon any nonhuman animal. Why does animal abuse not apply to animal testing? Animal testing has been around for about 40 years‚ ever since the 1920’s; it had a breakthrough and became well known. The number of animals being used for testing each year continues to increase. Animals’ that are being used for testing is wrong because it is inhumane. Animal testing is bad science. Time and time again animal experiments show that it
Premium Animal rights Animal testing Human
read the following excerpt in a research reported in Human Rights Watch: “In cases of very young girls – girls below [age] 12 or 13 – they [police officers and hospital staff] believe it is a case of sexual abuse. But if they are older‚ then they believe that the girl is trying to falsely frame someone. Their belief changes the way
Premium Rape Sexual intercourse Violence
In addition with no enforced laws‚ animals produce different results than humans. For instance‚ lead in w/transition “Even within the same species‚ similar disparities can be found among different sexes‚ breeds‚ age and weight ranges‚ and ethnic backgrounds” (“Results from Research…” n.pag.) The research people are doing will have an unlikely result in succeeding and or curing because they do not consider different characteristics of animals. Even with animals of the same species‚ there is no guarantee
Premium Animal testing Animal rights Human