Privity of Contract LGST101 Business Law Professor George Shenoy Group Members: Ue Mu En‚ Esther Goh Yue Lin‚ Sylvia Fong Li Chu Sabina Sun Chao Ng Shi Ya 1 Content Page 1. Case Summary 2. Can Brad sue Jennifer? 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Validity of Contract Breach of Contract Brad cannot sue Jennifer Brad can sue Jennifer 3. Can Angelina sue Jennifer? 3.1 3.2 Angelina cannot sue Jennifer Angelina can sue Jennifer 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 Contract (Rights of
Premium Contract Common law Breach of contract
intended to use a food product which is entering a competitive UK market. In this case‚ it is intended to concentrate on two diverse products: 1. Low salt and fat cheddar (blocks) 2. Handy sealed multi packs each containing 5 long thin strips of cheddar The benefits and drawbacks attached to cheese consumption must be known to enable the marketers to develop a strategy: 1. Nutrition 2. Cavity Prevention 3. Cancer Prevention 4. Weight maintenance 5. Bone Strength - children‚ elderly
Premium Marketing
a) The first contract should be between the Ramirez family and Majestic Developers‚ inc‚ as they are the parties involved. (b) The consideration on the Ramirez family side is their 250-acre farm and on Majestic Developers‚ inc the consideration is three million million dollars. (c) What should be included in the contract should be; the parties‚ (2) the price‚ (3) the subject matter of the contract‚ and (4) the time of performance of the contract‚ also the contract should address the small fence
Premium Tax Depreciation Taxation
FACTS: SS/Alicante‚ belonging to Compania Transatlantica de Barcelona was transporting two locomotive boilers for the Manila Railroad Company. The equipment of the ship for discharging the heavy cargo was not strong enough to handle the boilers. Compania Transatlantica contracted the services of Atlantic gulf and Pacific Co.‚ which had the best equipment to lift the boilers out of the ship’s hold. When Alicante arrived in Manila‚ Atlantic company sent out its floating crane under the
Premium Contract
Practical Report: Period 3 Elements Name: Titus Lee Date: 12th February 2014 Partners: Louella Jarillas‚ Vevaan Nguyen‚ Alexandro Francisco‚ Alif Ahmed Aim: To examine the similarities and differences between the properties of a selection of the elements of Period 3 Hypothesis: Sodium will be the most reactive element and sulphur will be the least reactive Equipment and Method: Found on Page 28-9 in Heinemann Chemistry 1 Student Workbook Results: Element Observations Element Observations
Premium Oxygen Metal Periodic table
and received some payments. The Government subsequently stopped its subsidy scheme and the Plaintiff sued the Government for subsidies it claimed it was due. Rules There was no contract. The statement made by the Commonwealth was not offered as consideration for the plaintiff buying the wool. The Court stated that in cases such as this: ‘… it is necessary‚ … that it should be made to appear that the statement or announcement which is relied on as a promise [here the subsidy statement] was really
Premium Contract Plaintiff Defendant
Contract Law Cases The Offer Meeting of minds: Clarke v Earl of Dunraven and Mount Earl: Yacht races. Letters sent in Communication (in writing‚ speech and conduct): Carlil v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co: pay back 100 if you get influenza. Deposit 1000 The Acceptance: Strictly in response to
Premium Contract
Periodicity - Trends in Period 3 To succeed in this topic you need to:• understand the work in Factsheet 1 on Atomic Structure • understand the work in Factsheet 6 on structure of elements and compounds‚ including how bonding relates to physical properties. • be able to use the periodic table to locate the positions of elements. The Periodic Table In the periodic table‚ elements are placed in order of increasing atomic number (fig 1.) The horizontal rows of elements are called periods The vertical
Premium Periodic table
2nd of feb CASES MALLIK V BCC: Malik and Mahmud v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA [1997] UKHL 23 is a leading English contract law and UK labour law case‚ which confirmed the existence of the implied term of mutual trust and confidence in all contracts of employment. Facts: Mr Malik and Mr Mahmud both worked for the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. BCCI went insolvent due to massive fraud‚ connection with terrorists‚ money-laundering‚ extortion and a raft of other criminal
Premium Contract Breach of contract
DYJR7EAdvertisements of Bilateral Contracts Are Not Usually Offers Case Coelho Vs The Public Services Commission 1. Brief Facts/ Case Summary The applicant‚ Mr Meredith Coelho was a health inspector under the town Board Tanjung Malim and he applied for the post of Assistant Passport Officer in the Federation of Malaya Government Oversea Missions as advertised in the Malay Mail newspaper dated 1957. The terms and conditions of the selection are as stated below: * Serving Assistant passport
Premium Contract