Rawls’ Difference Principle Rawls believed in the ideal of perfect equality. This meant‚ to him‚ that everyone should have equal opportunity and receive the same treatment. To Rawls‚ there was only one reason why anyone should be treated differently to any other person – to help the worst off members of society. He called this reason the difference principle‚ and in conjunction with his “Justice as Fairness” ideal it formed the basis of his claims about distributive justice. Rawls’ natural
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy Justice
Rawls’ Maximin Principle: Is It Really The Most Rational Solution? Political philosophy aims to reflect the normative and conceptual dimensions of political life. American philosopher John Rawls is widely recognized as one of the leading political philosophers of the twentieth century. His A Theory of Justice (1971) is one of the primary texts in political philosophy and proposes two principles of justice. The first‚ the liberty principle‚ defines basic liberties and the second‚ the difference
Premium A Theory of Justice John Rawls Original position
and Rousseau‚ to explain why the law is justified in its right to constrain the behaviour of individuals and organisations in society. Later in the twentieth century‚ John Rawls took a novel stance on the concept of the social contract‚ in which principles of justice were defined for an ‘ideal society’. As such‚ these principles may offer good moral reasons to comply willingly with the law. However‚ more recently there have been criticisms by feminists that the social contract does not paint a complete
Premium Political philosophy John Rawls Sociology
Which is the most appealing Nozick’s entitlement theory or Rawls theory of distributive justice? The defence of liberal ideologies emerged not long after the Second World War‚ prior to this there had been little faith in liberal values during the 1920’s and 1930’s‚ however after the war there appeared to be a renewed defence for liberal thinking ranging across a variety of ideological theories. To the present day these liberal perspectives continue to influence political thinking with regards
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
Justice Part I – Introduction John Rawls’ Theory of Justice is based on the idea of distributive justice‚ that is‚ how justice should be distributed to each individual within a society. Rawls’ theory contrasts with the theory of utilitarianism‚ because it values the welfare of each individual over the ‘greater good’‚ and does not believe that one person should sacrifice their own needs or desires in order to benefit a larger number of people. This has led Rawls to develop the idea of the ‘Original
Premium John Rawls Political philosophy
In a broad sense‚ both Rawls and Nozick agree that the legitimacy of a just society is highly dependent on the emphasis of liberty for its citizens. For Rawls‚ it is the first principal of justice‚ and though he presupposes equal liberty as a basic right for each person‚ he makes a point to prioritize its importance. Rawls outlines some basic liberties‚ including political liberties‚ equal treatment under the law‚ and the freedom to hold personal property (Rawls‚ 677). Nozick agrees with this emphasis
Premium Economic inequality Political philosophy A Theory of Justice
A contemporary philosopher‚ John Rawls (1921-2002)‚ is noted for his contributions to political and moral philosophy. In particular‚ Rawls ’ discussion about justice introduced five important concepts into discourse‚ including: the two principles of justice‚ the “original position” and “veil of ignorance‚” reflective equilibrium‚ overlapping consensus‚ and public reason. What is interesting about these five contributions is how Rawls’ speculative thought has been used by scholars across disciplinary
Premium John Rawls
the principle of fairness a sound moral principle? Reflection on John Rawls’ theory. The theory of justice as fairness was one of the most important elements of John Rawls’s philosophy‚ the one frequently discussed and significant for the twentieth-century political philosophy. To answer the question stated in the topic I would like to divide my dissertation into two major consecutive parts. First‚ I will examine what the principle of fairness implies and what are‚ in accordance to Rawls‚ the
Premium Morality Ethics John Rawls
Justice as Fairness Rawls first begins with discussing how we are lead to the original position. The original position is a hypothetical argument that considers a society where people do not decide what is right or wrong based on a higher power or emotion‚ but rather on common sense. These ideas establish justice or fairness simply based on the community’s beliefs that they create. However‚ these agreements cannot be made without the “veil of ignorance.” This means that all instances that
Premium A Theory of Justice John Rawls Original position
The difference principle is a very fair and effective way to ensure justice in society. However‚ in some cases and when taken to certain extremes‚ it does not hold up as a principle of justice. This essay will first define important terms like difference principle‚ original position and veil of ignorance. The example of Sidney Crosby will be examined to see how the difference principle holds up against some reasonable and logical arguments. Then the difference principle will be exposed to some
Premium Political philosophy Sociology John Rawls