One of the most well-known and controversial studies in the realm of psychology was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo in the 1970s to study the effects of prison conformity on a sample group of college students. This study‚ known as the Stanford Prison Experiment‚ was scheduled to continue for two weeks‚ but it had to be cut short to six days due to the horrendous events that occurred during procedures. Although the majority of researchers currently agree that Zimbardo’s experiment was completely unethical
Premium Stanford prison experiment Stanford prison experiment Prison
A. Stanford Prison Experiment- In this experiment‚ students volunteered to be a part of a psychology experiment that was being conducted at Stanford College. Because of the situation around them‚ they conformed to the environment‚ even though it was only a simple experiment in a Stanford hallway. Embarrassed and yet impressed‚ the experimenters stated this‚ “The negative‚ anti-social reactions observed were not the product of an environment created by combining a collection of deviant personalities
Premium Psychology Education Teacher
Christopher Campbell 10/02/2012 Psych 320 Was the Stanford Prison Study Ethical? The test aimed to show that the inherent personality traits of prisoners and guards are the chief cause of abusive behavior in prison. Zimbardo and his selected team with funding from the US Office of Naval Research selected twenty-four predominately “healthy” white middle class males for the experiment. The subjects were selected through extensive background and psychological tests excluding those with criminal
Premium Stanford prison experiment Ethics Psychology
(n.d.). To test his theories‚ Zimbardo conducted a study‚ known as the Stanford Prison Study‚ which confirmed his theoretical development of deindividuation. Zimbardo postulates that the individual in a group is less likely to follow normal rules of behavior‚ partly because they become anonymous and the sense of responsibility fades. In addition‚ the individual’s self-awareness is relaxed. Some examples from the prison study that we can see is that the anonymity is accentuated in situations in
Premium
While the Stanford Prison experiment is considered unethical‚ what usefulness has come from the experimental outcomes? Was it right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research? Explain how the experiment and consequently the suffering has added to current research in the field of social psychology. While the Stanford Prison experiment is considered unethical‚ what usefulness has come from the
Premium Prison Recidivism Stanford prison experiment
In 1971‚ psychologist Philip Zimbardo set up a simulated prison experiment in order to show that people tend to slip into their predefined roles regardless of their own judgements and morals. Zimbardo was interested in the power of given social situation and social roles. To conduct the experiment‚ Zimbardo and his colleagues Hainey and Banks set up a fake prison facility in the basement of Stanford University. There was a small opening at the end of the hall and intercom system was placed for Zimbardo
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Philip Zimbardo
The Stanford Prison Experiment Throughout all of history‚ psychological experiments have created controversy throughout the world. A specific example of this argument would be what came from the Stanford Prison Experiment in 1971. This experiment tested whether brutality shown by prison guards was due to sadistic personalities or the environment of the prison (McLeod‚ 2008). This experiment is known for its ethical issues displayed towards the men who were involved in the study. Although this experiment
Premium Stanford prison experiment Prison Milgram experiment
The Stanford Prison Experiment Over the years there have been some controversial psychology experiments. Experiments are a way to find an answer to life’s unanswered questions and to make a difference in this world. Not every experiment ended in a wonderful way; instead it is the complete opposite. One of the most controversial experiments is the Stanford Prison Experiment. This experiment lead to a disturbing results leaving the subjects in trauma. Psychologists must stop experiments that can harm
Premium
Breanna Brantigan Stanford Prison Study In 1971‚ a group of psychologists created a remarkable experiment using a mock prison as the setting‚ with college students role-playing prisoners and guards to test the power of the social situation to determine behavior. The research‚ referred to as the Stanford Prison Experiment‚ is a classic display of situational power and how it influences someone’s morals and behavior. The experiment was supposed to last two weeks‚ however‚ the unexpected transformation
Premium
The Stanford Prison experiment drew the attention of how adapting to a situation can make a person become someone else‚ leaving behind who they previously were. Social Psychologist‚ Philip G. Zimbardo‚ highlighted the presentation of classic psychological research on situational forces on human behaviour. Zimbardo debated that the situation is the core in creating individuals to act in ways they would have not acted before. The extent to how situational forces can explain evil acts by the individuals
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Philip Zimbardo