Is Torture Acceptable? Catholic Perspective If a bomb is about to explode in New York and the police have captured the man responsible‚ are they morally allowed to torture him in order to get the diffusion codes? This is a topic of interest in the government and public right now‚ as people are debating whether or not torture is ethically right. Many people in the United States‚ especially in the military‚ claim torture can be very effective in gaining information‚ and that it can even save lives
Premium Torture Human rights United States
Hollywood has given society the impression that torture is the effective last resort for interrogators to get crucial information. There is a cliché scenario in which a bomb is ticking somewhere and the villain will not tell the interrogator how to stop it. Reluctantly the interrogator starts using brutal torture methods until he gets the confession and saves the day. The “ticking time bomb” scenario is unrealistic and it gives a false perception to society of how interrogations really work. The
Premium Torture Central Intelligence Agency Interrogation
Torture is “the act of inflicting excruciating pain‚ as punishment or revenge‚ as a means of getting a confession or information‚ or for sheer cruelty” (Dictionary.com). It is thought that torture is used to get information that may save lives. In “September 17‚ 2001 - President George W. Bush sign[ed] a secret memo authorizing the CIA to detain suspected terrorists” (“CIA Torture Report Fast Facts”). What innocent citizens don’t know‚ is that torture is sometimes used wrongly and for revenge instead
Premium Torture George W. Bush Central Intelligence Agency
This paper addresses one of the most abiding and heated controversies surrounding the topic of torture and morality. Put simply‚ this controversy concerns the issue of whether under extreme and exceptional circumstances‚ a government agency should be legally permitted to use torture as a means of punishment or extracting information. According to Oxford Dictionary‚ torture is defined as “The action of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something”
Premium Morality Human rights Torture
I do not believe in torture and consider it something barbaric and inhuman. Therefore I would say that torture is never acceptable under any circumstances‚ and regardless of what the consequences might be. Torture and civilization do not mix because the latter highly emphasizes the value of human beings as it is something intrinsic. Democracy also does not mix with torture because democratic societies believe in human rights and equality. My point is that the end does not justify the means when it
Premium Human Morality Torture
Torture can be defined as mental or physical harm to any human being. Whether to torture an enemy or any individual including the ethics of it is a very problematic topic to this day. After the attack on Paris it became even more controversial and the remaining question is whether using torture to obtain information to save lives outweighed the ethical and moral obligations. Human rights become involved‚ including the ramifications it could have. An American free society is supposed to be 100%
Premium Torture Human rights Suffering
Yunji Kim English 102 Professor Harkness 10/24/12 RE 1 Revised Does Torture Work?: Is it really one effective way? Taxi to the Dark Side (Alex Gibney 2007) accuse of what was going on behind the curtain in Abu Ghraib. Dilawar‚ the innocent taxi driver who took 3 passengers for a taxi ride‚ has been under detention with harsh torture under the purpose of getting information‚ and died. The military police Thomas Curtis‚ who was at Bagram says‚ “My memory of Dilawar was chained up with the
Premium Iraq War Interrogation Torture
Torture: Right or Wrong Jennifer Lopez April 22‚ 2013 Ustick 7 US History Lopez 1 Torture: Right or Wrong Torture means any act by which severe pain or suffering‚ whether physical or mental‚ is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession‚ punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed‚ or intimidating or coercing him or a third person‚ or
Premium Human rights Torture Abuse
the utilization of torture and its effectiveness as a means to elicit information. A main argument has been supplied that torture is ineffective in its purpose to gather information from the victim. The usefulness of torture has been questioned because prisoners might use false information to elude their torturers‚ which has occurred in previous cases of torture. It has also been supposed that torture is necessary in order to use the information to save many lives. Torture has been compared to
Premium Torture Human rights World War II
Is torture ever acceptable? According to the UN Convention Against Torture‚ any infliction of torture1 i.e. waterboarding is banned under international law and the domestic laws of most countries in the 21st century. The point of contention is whether torture under any circumstances should be entirely prohibited. This opinion piece will be centered towards the debate regarding interrogation using torture methods and argue that torture is never acceptable from the moral and utilitarian perspectives
Premium Torture