Cipla v Roche – Generics Industry Rejoices! For the last two years‚ the Delhi High Court has been the battle ground for a pharmaceutical war between Roche and Cipla over Roche’s patent for the anticancer drug ‘erlotinib’‚ sold by Roche as ’Tarceva’. On 24 April 2009‚ the Division bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed Roche’s appeal against the refusal of a single judge to grant an injunction restraining Cipla from manufacturing‚ offering for sale‚ selling and exporting its generic version of ‘erlotinib’
Premium Patent application Patent Patentability
The Fantasies the Blind The Great Gatsby is a book written by F. Scott Fitzgerald based on the Jazz age and the average life that people live in that time. Some people try to claim that the events that happen in the book are loosely based on the Fitzgerald’s own life‚ but in the book everything is much more dramatized that there appears to be no relationship between the two. The story takes place in the roaring 20’s and is based on the events that happen with Nick Carraway‚ the narrator‚ Jay
Premium F. Scott Fitzgerald The Great Gatsby Jay Gatsby
August 7‚ 1999‚ a car occupied by three men‚ Donte Partlow (driver and owner of vehicle) respondent Pringle (front seat passenger)‚ and Otis Smith in the backseat‚ was stopped for speeding by a police officer. When the officer requested Partlow’s license and registration the defendant opened the glove compartment exposing a large amount of money‚ which turned out to be $763. The officer returned to his patrol car to run the license and found nothing‚ so he issued Partlow a verbal warning. Once the
Premium Police Crime Police brutality
non-occupiers and errors in the title records. The intention is not to "reward the diligent trespasser for his wrong nor to penalise the negligent and dormant owner for sleeping upon his rights..." . At common law‚ the possession of land raises a prima
Premium Law Property Property law
In tort law‚ a duty of care is a legal obligation which is imposed on an individual requiring adherence to a standard of reasonable care while performing any acts that could foreseeably harm others. It is the first element that must be established to proceed with an action in negligence. The claimant must be able to show a duty of care imposed by law which the defendant has breached. In turn‚ breaching a duty may subject an individual to liability. The duty of care may be imposed by operation of
Premium Duty of care Tort Negligence
Cap. 622 governing the convening of board meetings and the requisite notice thereof. S.571(2) stipulates that the requisite length of a meeting other than AGM is 14 days. Seen in this light‚ the notice of the Board meeting of December 31‚ 2013 prima facie failed to comply with the statutory requirement and was therefore invalid. Having said that‚ two points need to be raised. S.579(1) of Cap.622 does provide that accidental omission of service of notice shall not render a meeting invalid. That
Premium Service of process Shareholder Stock market
SANCTITY OF LIFE We all have different viewpoints when it comes to Embryonic Stem Cell Therapy. Majority of the individuals believes that it violates the sanctity of life because they consider the act of destroying a human blastocyst is equal to killing a human being. Embryos are considered humans from the moment of the union of the gametes; hence‚ it can be relayed as the weakest members of society. It is morally wrong to exploit the weak merely because some benefit can be derived from it
Premium Stem cell
condition‚ or thing of which the first person had no direct experience. When submitted as evidence‚ such statements are called hearsay evidence. Hearsay evidence is generally not accepted in court. The general rule is that all relevant evidence are prima facie admissible‚ except for hearsay and opinion. However‚ under the Evidence Act 1950‚ there are basically some exceptions to the general rule regarding to hearsay evidence. Among the exceptions are sections 32‚ 33‚ 34‚ 35‚ 38 and 73A of the said Act1
Premium Evidence law
Imagine that you are a member of an ethics committee listening to arguments for and against altering the way in which human organs are obtained for patients in need of transplants. A new policy to allow the sale of organs by consenting individuals to patients in need and to medical institutions has been proposed. Critics argue that permitting organs to be bought and sold is unethical. You have been asked to review the arguments for and against the commercialization of organ transplants and to construct
Premium Organ transplant Organ Human anatomy
Case 1: Employment Discrimination with Claudia British law‚ which means that you can defend the British courts and public bodies (including government‚ the police and local councils)‚ Human Rights Act 1998‚ your rights‚ before must be justice‚ dignity and respect for equality. The Bill of Rights‚ to protect us all – young‚ old‚ rich and poor. I hope you never need to rely on it‚ but hundreds of people every year to do it. However‚ the law is often misunderstood and misrepresented. We played straight
Premium Law United States Discrimination