While the United States has grown as a country throughout the years‚ along with it‚ the idea of discrimination has become less and less tolerable to the typical American. From our very well known reputation of freedom‚ to the abolishment of slavery and segregation‚ to fighting for gay marriage and women’s equality‚ overall the American mind has broadened and put in an effort to accept the endless amounts and types of people that this world has to offer. Even then‚ with every new generation of employees
Premium Religion Employment Body modification
A.C. No. 5955 September 8‚ 2009 JOHN CHRISTEN S. HEGNA‚ Complainant‚ vs. ATTY. GOERING G.C. PADERANGA‚ Respondent. PETITIONER’S (COMPLAINANT) CLAIM: RESPONDENT’S CLAIM: ISSUE/S: is Atty. Paderanga guilty of engaging in dishonest and deceitful conduct? RULING: A.C. No. 5955 September 8‚ 2009 JOHN CHRISTEN S. HEGNA‚ Complainant‚ vs. ATTY. GOERING G.C. PADERANGA‚ Respondent. D E C I S I O N DEL CASTILLO‚ J.: Before this Court is a letter-complaint1 dated
Premium Defendant Prima facie Plaintiff
client was advised of the reporting requirements- ‘harm to self and other’. National Privacy Principle September 2001 http://www.privacy.gov.au/law/act/npp http://www.privacy.gov.au/materials/types/download/8774/6582 Schedule 3‚ 2e&f IV) Prima facie personal values- client autonomy vs. non maleficience and fidelity. V) Discuss case with other senior practitioners VI) Discuss case with industry body VII) Obtain legal advice. ACTION PLAN 1) Advise client that you have a requirement by
Premium Ethics Sexual intercourse HIV
insubordination. 4. Research the case. How did the court rule? Why did they rule in this manner? The wrongful termination claim‚ that claim fails to make out a prima facie case in that Canady failed to establish the fourth prong (i.e. that there are facts that permit an inference of discrimination). Alternatively‚ even if Canady made out a prima facie case‚ he failed to present sufficient evidence of
Premium Racism Logic Prima facie
grounds‚ i) That it had a prima facie case ii) That the “balance of convenience” was in its favour iii) That it would suffer “irreparable injury”‚ if CIPLA was not injuncted A prima facie case is a case where there are sufficient evidences to support (but not necessarily force) an outcome‚ provided the evidences are not challenged. There the prima facie evidence is the patent that Roche acquired in Indian in 2007 for Erlotinib (Tarceva). The irony is that the prima facie evidence is the main point
Premium Prima facie Legal burden of proof Judgment
INDEPENDENT AND CORRUPT PRACTICES COMMISION (ICPC) The Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) is the apex body saddled by law with the responsibility to fight corruption and other related offences in Nigeria. It was set up and empowered by the Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Act 2000.ICPC was inaugurated on the 29th of September 2000 with a Chairman and 12 Members. Section 3(14) of the Act ensures the independence of the Commission as not being
Premium Olusegun Obasanjo Nigeria Prima facie
Over the 3 week duration of the course I learned many theories that tried to provide answerers on the search for good and evil. Kant’s theory on deontology‚ Freud’s theory on psycho egoism and self deception Theory of Ethical conventionalism‚ Theory on human and nature centered ethics‚ Ethical pluralism and many more. If I had to choose any of the theories that I learned in class it would be the theory of ethical conventionalism‚ and Kant’s theory on deontology. I would choose ethical conventionalism
Premium Deontological ethics Immanuel Kant Ethics
Case law review: Section 10- Things said or done by conspirator in reference to common design Subject: Law of Evidence Submitted To: Dr. K. Vidyullatha Reddy Submitted By: Mohammed Omer Farooq 3rd Year‚ 5th Semester Roll No: 2011-46 National Academy for Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) University of Law‚ Hyderabad Table of Contents Table of Cases Arul Raja v. State of T.N 9 Balmokond v. Emperor 3 Barindra Kumar Ghose v. Emperor
Premium Prima facie Jury Common law
reported the matter to the police on 19 July 1984‚ after grievance meetings failed to resolve the controversy. A criminal complaint was filed against GOMEZ‚ but the investigating fiscal dismissed the same saying that STARLITE failed to establish a prima facie case against GOMEZ. On 13 August 1983‚ private respondent GOMEZ filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against STARLITE. After the parties submitted their respective position papers‚ the Labor Arbiter rendered his decision on 15 January 1985 dismissing
Premium Employment 1984 Prima facie
(in a criminal trial) or preponderance of the evidence (in Civil Matters) that a crime has been committed and that the accused did in fact commit said crime. (Ingram pg.47) Burden of going forward: is the prosecution’s obligation to introduce prima facie evidence that will move toward meeting the burden of proof. (Ingram pg.47) Burden of persuasion: simply means the burden of convincing the fact finder of the collective truth of evidence presented by prosecution or defense. (Ingram pg.48)
Premium Jury Legal burden of proof Trial